Anonymous wrote:LOL what a joke. How many non-URMs are Yale and Harvard or Yale and Stanford cross-admits a year? Probably fewer than 100.
Anonymous wrote:At my daughter’s progressive private school, there are six ED applications to Brown and zero to Harvard and Stanford (Yale has one). No one is particularly interested in being part of the military industrial complex.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Safety" compared to all other ivies besides Cornell, not places like WashU or GU or Emory of course.
So, having a higher admissions rate makes it is a "safety" relative to six other colleges... and not the other 3,000?
That is not a definition of a safety I have ever heard. It's not a sensible statement. By that logic, Yale is a "safety" for Stanford applicants. Please stop trolling.
Safety is not the best word but what people mean here is that students choose other places if they get the chance. Desirability is not dependent just on admissions rate. At GDS most students jump at the chance of attending another ivy other than Brown and Cornell if they have the option. Tis is def true. And yes, Yale is a safety to Harvard/Stanford in the sense that most people would jump at the chance of attending one of the latter over the former. This is not controversial.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:At my daughter’s progressive private school, there are six ED applications to Brown and zero to Harvard and Stanford (Yale has one). No one is particularly interested in being part of the military industrial complex.
code for mediocre private.
Anonymous wrote:At my daughter’s progressive private school, there are six ED applications to Brown and zero to Harvard and Stanford (Yale has one). No one is particularly interested in being part of the military industrial complex.
Anonymous wrote:
Safety is not the best word but what people mean here is that students choose other places if they get the chance. Desirability is not dependent just on admissions rate. At GDS most students jump at the chance of attending another ivy other than Brown and Cornell if they have the option. Tis is def true. And yes, Yale is a safety to Harvard/Stanford in the sense that most people would jump at the chance of attending one of the latter over the former. This is not controversial.
Anonymous wrote: And yes, Yale is a safety to Harvard/Stanford in the sense that most people would jump at the chance of attending one of the latter over the former.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Safety" compared to all other ivies besides Cornell, not places like WashU or GU or Emory of course.
So, having a higher admissions rate makes it is a "safety" relative to six other colleges... and not the other 3,000?
That is not a definition of a safety I have ever heard. It's not a sensible statement. By that logic, Yale is a "safety" for Stanford applicants. Please stop trolling.
Anonymous wrote:"Safety" compared to all other ivies besides Cornell, not places like WashU or GU or Emory of course.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about what these lists actually prove.
The ridiculous idea that Brown is a "safety" for GDS students when the vast majority go to lower ranked (but still excellent) schools.
18 to WashU gets at your point perfectly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm confused about what these lists actually prove.
The ridiculous idea that Brown is a "safety" for GDS students when the vast majority go to lower ranked (but still excellent) schools.