Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking for an alienating experience as a bilingual Chinese-speaking family? Attend a YY open house. I've done that twice, six years apart, and wound up leaving early both times. I left thinking, wow, the principal and vp aren't even allowing for the fact that a bilingual Chinese-speaking family might be in this room.
Can you explain more about why these meetings felt alienating to you? Did you feel hostility toward bilingual Chinese-speaking families, or did you feel that the program was aimed at beginning speakers rather than bilingual speakers?
They won't have confidence unless there is, at a minimum, a principal or HOS who is fluent in Chinese.
This isn't an irrational concern; not long ago DCPS put a principal in charge of a dual-immersion Spanish-English elementary and the parents went crazy. That principal was replaced shortly thereafter.
But what exactly was it about the meeting that felt "alienating"? That is a very strong word to use, so I'm wondering what made the meeting feel that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking for an alienating experience as a bilingual Chinese-speaking family? Attend a YY open house. I've done that twice, six years apart, and wound up leaving early both times. I left thinking, wow, the principal and vp aren't even allowing for the fact that a bilingual Chinese-speaking family might be in this room.
Can you explain more about why these meetings felt alienating to you? Did you feel hostility toward bilingual Chinese-speaking families, or did you feel that the program was aimed at beginning speakers rather than bilingual speakers?
They won't have confidence unless there is, at a minimum, a principal or HOS who is fluent in Chinese.
This isn't an irrational concern; not long ago DCPS put a principal in charge of a dual-immersion Spanish-English elementary and the parents went crazy. That principal was replaced shortly thereafter.
Anonymous wrote:Looking for an alienating experience as a bilingual Chinese-speaking family? Attend a YY open house. I've done that twice, six years apart, and wound up leaving early both times. I left thinking, wow, the principal and vp aren't even allowing for the fact that a bilingual Chinese-speaking family might be in this room.
Can you explain more about why these meetings felt alienating to you? Did you feel hostility toward bilingual Chinese-speaking families, or did you feel that the program was aimed at beginning speakers rather than bilingual speakers?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
There are some (one in my house) but their parents rarely put in for the YY lottery.
Sure, YY parents (at least 98% of whom aren't fluent in any dialect of Chinese) who stay with the program are happy. But many have real concerns about the way DCI is shaping up. They should be concerned. There's only so much you can do with MS partial language immersion without any native speakers. There isn't a single one at DCI on a Chinese track. Also, there is effectively no academic tracking in science, social studies or English in a school with a high needs mostly Latino population.
Chinese speaking parents don't put their kids in the YY lottery, because it's a school designed to teach beginning Chinese to children who don't already speak it. I don't see what the appeal of such a school would be to parents of kids who speak the language fluently, and, given the demographics of DC, even if every Chinese speaking 3 year old entered the DC lottery, the class would still be largely kids who didn't speak any Chinese at entry.
2 way immersion is a great model. But it's just one model for immersion, and not one that DC has the demographics to support, at least given the current charter school law. So, criticizing Yu Ying for not being 2 way immersion, is absurd, and criticizing DC's Chinese parents for not choosing a 1 way immersion school, is equally absurd.
What's absurd is how droves of YY parents elect to believe what YY tells them, that their kids' spoken Chinese is good (along with their math and English without supplementing extensively at home). They seem desperate to believe that the kids are on track to score high on IBD exams. Sorry, nope.
I looked up "IBD exams", and came up with exams for irritable bowel disease, and for the institute of brewing and distilling.
Are you possibly referring to IB exams? I'm skeptical that you're an expert on them, if you don't know the name.
IBD = IB D(iploma) tests
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
There are some (one in my house) but their parents rarely put in for the YY lottery.
Sure, YY parents (at least 98% of whom aren't fluent in any dialect of Chinese) who stay with the program are happy. But many have real concerns about the way DCI is shaping up. They should be concerned. There's only so much you can do with MS partial language immersion without any native speakers. There isn't a single one at DCI on a Chinese track. Also, there is effectively no academic tracking in science, social studies or English in a school with a high needs mostly Latino population.
Chinese speaking parents don't put their kids in the YY lottery, because it's a school designed to teach beginning Chinese to children who don't already speak it. I don't see what the appeal of such a school would be to parents of kids who speak the language fluently, and, given the demographics of DC, even if every Chinese speaking 3 year old entered the DC lottery, the class would still be largely kids who didn't speak any Chinese at entry.
2 way immersion is a great model. But it's just one model for immersion, and not one that DC has the demographics to support, at least given the current charter school law. So, criticizing Yu Ying for not being 2 way immersion, is absurd, and criticizing DC's Chinese parents for not choosing a 1 way immersion school, is equally absurd.
What's absurd is how droves of YY parents elect to believe what YY tells them, that their kids' spoken Chinese is good (along with their math and English without supplementing extensively at home). They seem desperate to believe that the kids are on track to score high on IBD exams. Sorry, nope.
I looked up "IBD exams", and came up with exams for irritable bowel disease, and for the institute of brewing and distilling.
Are you possibly referring to IB exams? I'm skeptical that you're an expert on them, if you don't know the name.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
NP, from the Brent district. Brent now has a % of kids of Chinese of descent in PreS3-2nd grade to rival Thomson & YY.
What those who argue that the dearth of Chinese-speaking kids at YY is all due to "the demographics of DC" don't get is this is only half the story.
Looking for an alienating experience as a bilingual Chinese-speaking family? Attend a YY open house. I've done that twice, six years apart, and wound up leaving early both times. I left thinking, wow, the principal and vp aren't even allowing for the fact that a bilingual Chinese-speaking family might be in this room.
Can you explain what they did or said that gave you that assumption?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
There are some (one in my house) but their parents rarely put in for the YY lottery.
Sure, YY parents (at least 98% of whom aren't fluent in any dialect of Chinese) who stay with the program are happy. But many have real concerns about the way DCI is shaping up. They should be concerned. There's only so much you can do with MS partial language immersion without any native speakers. There isn't a single one at DCI on a Chinese track. Also, there is effectively no academic tracking in science, social studies or English in a school with a high needs mostly Latino population.
Chinese speaking parents don't put their kids in the YY lottery, because it's a school designed to teach beginning Chinese to children who don't already speak it. I don't see what the appeal of such a school would be to parents of kids who speak the language fluently, and, given the demographics of DC, even if every Chinese speaking 3 year old entered the DC lottery, the class would still be largely kids who didn't speak any Chinese at entry.
2 way immersion is a great model. But it's just one model for immersion, and not one that DC has the demographics to support, at least given the current charter school law. So, criticizing Yu Ying for not being 2 way immersion, is absurd, and criticizing DC's Chinese parents for not choosing a 1 way immersion school, is equally absurd.
What's absurd is how droves of YY parents elect to believe what YY tells them, that their kids' spoken Chinese is good (along with their math and English without supplementing extensively at home). They seem desperate to believe that the kids are on track to score high on IBD exams. Sorry, nope.
Looking for an alienating experience as a bilingual Chinese-speaking family? Attend a YY open house. I've done that twice, six years apart, and wound up leaving early both times. I left thinking, wow, the principal and vp aren't even allowing for the fact that a bilingual Chinese-speaking family might be in this room.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
NP, from the Brent district. Brent now has a % of kids of Chinese of descent in PreS3-2nd grade to rival Thomson & YY.
What those who argue that the dearth of Chinese-speaking kids at YY is all due to "the demographics of DC" don't get is this is only half the story.
Looking for an alienating experience as a bilingual Chinese-speaking family? Attend a YY open house. I've done that twice, six years apart, and wound up leaving early both times. I left thinking, wow, the principal and vp aren't even allowing for the fact that a bilingual Chinese-speaking family might be in this room.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
There are some (one in my house) but their parents rarely put in for the YY lottery.
Sure, YY parents (at least 98% of whom aren't fluent in any dialect of Chinese) who stay with the program are happy. But many have real concerns about the way DCI is shaping up. They should be concerned. There's only so much you can do with MS partial language immersion without any native speakers. There isn't a single one at DCI on a Chinese track. Also, there is effectively no academic tracking in science, social studies or English in a school with a high needs mostly Latino population.
Chinese speaking parents don't put their kids in the YY lottery, because it's a school designed to teach beginning Chinese to children who don't already speak it. I don't see what the appeal of such a school would be to parents of kids who speak the language fluently, and, given the demographics of DC, even if every Chinese speaking 3 year old entered the DC lottery, the class would still be largely kids who didn't speak any Chinese at entry.
2 way immersion is a great model. But it's just one model for immersion, and not one that DC has the demographics to support, at least given the current charter school law. So, criticizing Yu Ying for not being 2 way immersion, is absurd, and criticizing DC's Chinese parents for not choosing a 1 way immersion school, is equally absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, but the Spanish immersion charters still attract a good many native speaking students, and strive to meet their particular academic needs. The Mundo Verde student body is thought to be at least one quarter native speakers. YY has never had more than 1 or 2 kids per grade who are truly native speakers (equally at home with Chinese and English, or speaking more Chinese than English), literally a handful of more than 500 students.
But that's due to the demographics of DC. How many Chinese speaking 3 year olds are there in DC?
There are some (one in my house) but their parents rarely put in for the YY lottery.
Sure, YY parents (at least 98% of whom aren't fluent in any dialect of Chinese) who stay with the program are happy. But many have real concerns about the way DCI is shaping up. They should be concerned. There's only so much you can do with MS partial language immersion without any native speakers. There isn't a single one at DCI on a Chinese track. Also, there is effectively no academic tracking in science, social studies or English in a school with a high needs mostly Latino population.