Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How should the teachers union address the state-mandated Good Friday and Easter Monday issue?
Go out as a UNION and request to the state that they remove one or both of these days as state mandated so the BOE of each district can handle the 180 days better, the kids get a full week of Spring Break without another day off in the beginning or the end (depending on when they have Spring Break) for either Good Friday or Easter Monday. As a matter of fact, why not just make Spring break after 3rd quarter and then you don't even need a Q3 planning half or full day. Teachers get a whole week to grade and report before 4th quarter. Because really neither are a holiday that kids need to be out of school for and Easter is on a Sunday so there is no need to have any days around it off. I say this as a Catholic. I much rather Jewish families fasting for Yom Kippur be off from school than my kids on Easter Monday doing nothing.
Anonymous wrote:How should the teachers union address the state-mandated Good Friday and Easter Monday issue?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How should the teachers union address the state-mandated Good Friday and Easter Monday issue?
Ask the BOE to request a waiver to include Good Friday and Easter Monday as optional snow days so that the regularly scheduled days June 12-14 can be used as full days and not snow days. This reduces the risk that kids will get less than 180 days of school in the event of snow days and still keeps to the mandated opening and closing dates.
Other schools have asked to use President's Day as an optional snow day and have been given waivers to that effect.
That's not what I consider to be the state-mandated Good Friday and Easter Monday issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How should the teachers union address the state-mandated Good Friday and Easter Monday issue?
Ask the BOE to request a waiver to include Good Friday and Easter Monday as optional snow days so that the regularly scheduled days June 12-14 can be used as full days and not snow days. This reduces the risk that kids will get less than 180 days of school in the event of snow days and still keeps to the mandated opening and closing dates.
Other schools have asked to use President's Day as an optional snow day and have been given waivers to that effect.
Anonymous wrote:How should the teachers union address the state-mandated Good Friday and Easter Monday issue?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS is already proposing a schedule option with no professional days during the school year. So I don't understand why you keep saying that the professional days are the problem.
Also, are you seriously proposing putting professional days during Christmas and New Year's? Is that when your office holds training sessions?
No, professional days can be the week before school starts. However, others are also saying that the teachers need days for grading, for cleaning their rooms, and for additional non-student activities that are non-training days. Teachers can take a day during the week between Christmas and New Year's (not on the actual days) or Spring Break if they need additional non-student days for such activities.
Teachers may or may not need days for such things, but they are already not in two of the four proposed calendar options. So they're not relevant to the discussion. If they're already not in the calendar options, you can't solve the calendar problems by removing them.
Two of the proposed calendars have no professional days. The other three have two (which can also be used as make-up days if needed). State law requires the school to be closed the week between Christmas and New Years, so you can't put them in there.
It's really frustrating that non teachers can't appreciate that planning and grading require current knowledge of your class. Sorry, I can't grade your kid's final exams over your Christmas break, because she hasn't take it yet. Can't grade the research papers that are not yet written... can't develop lesson plans to addess individual student needs that haven't surfaced yet. Teaching requires regular reflection and response. Planning days at intervals are much more beneficial for your children.
Anonymous wrote:
I will readily admit that I have no idea how professional days are used. It makes more sense for the school board to use sensible language like what you just used in order to communicate in a clear, rational way. The emotionally overwrought language they use about this issue is such a turnoff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS is already proposing a schedule option with no professional days during the school year. So I don't understand why you keep saying that the professional days are the problem.
Also, are you seriously proposing putting professional days during Christmas and New Year's? Is that when your office holds training sessions?
No, professional days can be the week before school starts. However, others are also saying that the teachers need days for grading, for cleaning their rooms, and for additional non-student activities that are non-training days. Teachers can take a day during the week between Christmas and New Year's (not on the actual days) or Spring Break if they need additional non-student days for such activities.
Teachers may or may not need days for such things, but they are already not in two of the four proposed calendar options. So they're not relevant to the discussion. If they're already not in the calendar options, you can't solve the calendar problems by removing them.
Two of the proposed calendars have no professional days. The other three have two (which can also be used as make-up days if needed). State law requires the school to be closed the week between Christmas and New Years, so you can't put them in there.
I will readily admit that I have no idea how professional days are used. It makes more sense for the school board to use sensible language like what you just used in order to communicate in a clear, rational way. The emotionally overwrought language they use about this issue is such a turnoff.
It's really frustrating that non teachers can't appreciate that planning and grading require current knowledge of your class. Sorry, I can't grade your kid's final exams over your Christmas break, because she hasn't take it yet. Can't grade the research papers that are not yet written... can't develop lesson plans to addess individual student needs that haven't surfaced yet. Teaching requires regular reflection and response. Planning days at intervals are much more beneficial for your children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS is already proposing a schedule option with no professional days during the school year. So I don't understand why you keep saying that the professional days are the problem.
Also, are you seriously proposing putting professional days during Christmas and New Year's? Is that when your office holds training sessions?
No, professional days can be the week before school starts. However, others are also saying that the teachers need days for grading, for cleaning their rooms, and for additional non-student activities that are non-training days. Teachers can take a day during the week between Christmas and New Year's (not on the actual days) or Spring Break if they need additional non-student days for such activities.
Teachers may or may not need days for such things, but they are already not in two of the four proposed calendar options. So they're not relevant to the discussion. If they're already not in the calendar options, you can't solve the calendar problems by removing them.
Two of the proposed calendars have no professional days. The other three have two (which can also be used as make-up days if needed). State law requires the school to be closed the week between Christmas and New Years, so you can't put them in there.
I will readily admit that I have no idea how professional days are used. It makes more sense for the school board to use sensible language like what you just used in order to communicate in a clear, rational way. The emotionally overwrought language they use about this issue is such a turnoff.
It's really frustrating that non teachers can't appreciate that planning and grading require current knowledge of your class. Sorry, I can't grade your kid's final exams over your Christmas break, because she hasn't take it yet. Can't grade the research papers that are not yet written... can't develop lesson plans to addess individual student needs that haven't surfaced yet. Teaching requires regular reflection and response. Planning days at intervals are much more beneficial for your children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS is already proposing a schedule option with no professional days during the school year. So I don't understand why you keep saying that the professional days are the problem.
Also, are you seriously proposing putting professional days during Christmas and New Year's? Is that when your office holds training sessions?
No, professional days can be the week before school starts. However, others are also saying that the teachers need days for grading, for cleaning their rooms, and for additional non-student activities that are non-training days. Teachers can take a day during the week between Christmas and New Year's (not on the actual days) or Spring Break if they need additional non-student days for such activities.
Teachers may or may not need days for such things, but they are already not in two of the four proposed calendar options. So they're not relevant to the discussion. If they're already not in the calendar options, you can't solve the calendar problems by removing them.
Two of the proposed calendars have no professional days. The other three have two (which can also be used as make-up days if needed). State law requires the school to be closed the week between Christmas and New Years, so you can't put them in there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm fine with school starting after Labor Day. The day everyone should petition the state to change is Easter Monday. That is not a holiday. No one goes to church that day or celebrates. That day could easily be reallocated elsewhere. Also, they could push back the end date in June a few days too.
You don't know much about local history. Easter Monday is a traditional African American day at the National Zoo and has been for many years (I just checked, this started in 1891). It's packed. This was started in the days when African Americans were not welcome at traditional Easter celebrations including Easter at the White House. It's still a big annual event for many black families from the metro region. It's often been called the Black Easter.
https://www.theroot.com/for-dc-easter-monday-at-the-national-zoo-is-an-african-1790859364
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:MCPS is already proposing a schedule option with no professional days during the school year. So I don't understand why you keep saying that the professional days are the problem.
Also, are you seriously proposing putting professional days during Christmas and New Year's? Is that when your office holds training sessions?
No, professional days can be the week before school starts. However, others are also saying that the teachers need days for grading, for cleaning their rooms, and for additional non-student activities that are non-training days. Teachers can take a day during the week between Christmas and New Year's (not on the actual days) or Spring Break if they need additional non-student days for such activities.
Teachers may or may not need days for such things, but they are already not in two of the four proposed calendar options. So they're not relevant to the discussion. If they're already not in the calendar options, you can't solve the calendar problems by removing them.