Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With a ridiculous number of names to choose from, Stuart won the most points. Change proponents are now arguing that a vote for Peace Valley (or Triggered Snowflake, or Braden Aust) is a vote for Barbara Rose Johns, but that is not necessarily the case.
I think a vote for Triggered Snowflake is a vote for JEB Stuart.
Are some of those names the names of high school students? Never heard of them.
I don't recognize all the names, either. Some are students or former students (Andy Anderson, for example).
Andy Anderson was a black Stuart graduate who died in Afghanistan while serving the United States.
Triggered Snowflakes are white residents of the Stuart district who want to keep honoring a Confederate general because it makes them think they'll still get to run the PTSA and Boosters clubs for years to come.
Anonymous wrote:Triggered Snowflakes are white residents of the Stuart district who want to keep honoring a Confederate general because it makes them think they'll still get to run the PTSA and Boosters clubs for years to come.
No Hon. "Triggered Snowflakes" are those who think they are damaged by the name of a school. They are the "changers". They are the ones who want to spend almost a million dollars to change the name of the school because they think it harms them. They are the ones who put political correctness above common sense.
Triggered Snowflakes are white residents of the Stuart district who want to keep honoring a Confederate general because it makes them think they'll still get to run the PTSA and Boosters clubs for years to come.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:With a ridiculous number of names to choose from, Stuart won the most points. Change proponents are now arguing that a vote for Peace Valley (or Triggered Snowflake, or Braden Aust) is a vote for Barbara Rose Johns, but that is not necessarily the case.
I think a vote for Triggered Snowflake is a vote for JEB Stuart.
Are some of those names the names of high school students? Never heard of them.
I don't recognize all the names, either. Some are students or former students (Andy Anderson, for example).
Anonymous wrote:And that Evans only worked with "changers" after she was contacted by current students at the school pushing for change.
Go read the FOIA. She clearly had been wanting the change before she was contacted.
Anonymous wrote:Snowflake High.
Done!
Anonymous wrote:With a ridiculous number of names to choose from, Stuart won the most points. Change proponents are now arguing that a vote for Peace Valley (or Triggered Snowflake, or Braden Aust) is a vote for Barbara Rose Johns, but that is not necessarily the case.
I think a vote for Triggered Snowflake is a vote for JEB Stuart.
Are some of those names the names of high school students? Never heard of them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe they should go Prince style: Triggered Snowflake: the school formerly known as Jeb Stuart High.
That would explain it better than almost anything.
Better than "Bunch of Racist A-Holes High"
Name calling is all you have?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Maybe they should go Prince style: Triggered Snowflake: the school formerly known as Jeb Stuart High.
That would explain it better than almost anything.
Better than "Bunch of Racist A-Holes High"
Anonymous wrote:Maybe they should go Prince style: Triggered Snowflake: the school formerly known as Jeb Stuart High.
That would explain it better than almost anything.
And that county voters just overwhelmingly voted for a pro-change candidate, Karen Keys-Gammara, for a school board vacancy, defeating the Republican-endorsed candidate who criticized the board's decision.
And that Evans only worked with "changers" after she was contacted by current students at the school pushing for change.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:http://www.wusa9.com/news/local/falls-church/debate-over-jeb-stuart-high-name-change-continues/476748538
Sounds like Ryan forgot that he voted in support of "Stuart"........
No. He voted in favor of getting rid of "J.E.B. Stuart" and allowing the community to decide whether "Stuart High School" without the initials was an acceptable "compromise" name.
It clearly isn't. Over 80% of the votes were against "Stuart High School." It would be ridiculous to make that the new name, and Ryan has correctly pointed that out.
You don't believe in rules do you? Do you always want to change them every time you don't get the result you desire?
First, we were told we would go by a community vote. The community voted by about 2/3 to keep Jeb Stuart.
Then, we were told we would form a committee. Half of the Ad Hoc committee--the half from outside the community voted to change. The other half--made up of community members--voted to keep Jeb Stuart.
Meanwhile, the slots to speak at SB meetings were manipulated in the early meetings to favor those who wanted change.
FOIA'd emails indicated that Evans had desired this change for sometime and worked with "changers"--many from outside the community. FOIA also indicates that the "massive resistance" reason for the Jeb Stuart name was bogus. Evans or Hynes made clear that the "massive resistance" reason was important to getting change. And, even though it is indicated in the FOIA through minutes from old SB meetings that this was not the case, they kept citing that.
Again, the community voted early on that they wished to keep the name Jeb Stuart.
Evans and Hynes did not like that result, so they changed the rules. Over and over again.