[quote=Anonymous]What a mean girls club has left comments here as if they are experts on beauty and grace. They are so arrogant with zero character. Sarah has 100% more class and outshines them all! These catty children are why I would never identify as a Democrank.[/quote]

You resurrected a 5-year-old thread to spew that nonsense?

[quote=Anonymous]What a mean girls club has left comments here as if they are experts on beauty and grace. They are so arrogant with zero character. Sarah has 100% more class and outshines them all! These catty children are why I would never identify as a Democrank.[/quote]

Is she still alive?

What a mean girls club has left comments here as if they are experts on beauty and grace. They are so arrogant with zero character. Sarah has 100% more class and outshines them all! These catty children are why I would never identify as a Democrank.

I would rec a plastic surgeon to look at that droopy eye...and a few fillers on her mouth corners...and a new do

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.

What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.

Huh? It’s very unprofessional.

Long hair in your 30s isn't unprofessional. Come out of the dark ages.

Hmm approaching 30 and I have long hair that I maintain very well, loose curls, straighten or in a bun.

Approaching 30 and "late 30s with 3 children and spokesperson for the President" are two completely different people. Her long hair would be professional if it was artfully styled in bun or twist.

Anonymous wrote:Sarah is certainly not a fashion plate, but I enjoy her plain spoken ways. I used to watch the State Dept spokesman back in the Obama days (redhead) weave and bob with the press, and she dressed as slick as her demeanor. What ever happened to her?

Plain spoken?

Her job is to spin, not to lie and insult.

Anonymous wrote:I disagree with her on everything and think she is a brazen liar at times. I don't, however, think there is anything really egregious about her styling either pre or post Scaramucci. I have to say that I think she dresses well to hide her midsection and I confess to having googled one of her outfits because I have the same unforgiving build.

Agree with this objective take. Putting aside my thoughts on substance, she looks fine both either way I think.

SHS is unfortunate looking ... but she wouldn't look so bad if she weren't so mean and nasty...not an attractive look.

I am still shocked to learned that SHS is only 36. .WTF???

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And she should chop off a bunch of inches from that long, stringy hair. It looks ridiculous on a woman her age.

What? Most people think long hair on a mid-30s woman is just fine.

Huh? It’s very unprofessional.

Long hair in your 30s isn't unprofessional. Come out of the dark ages.

All stringy and stuck to her shoulders. Yuck.

I do think it’s harder to look professional with long hair. Some women can carry it off. Collar-bone length or shorter works better for most women. Mine looks ridiculous when it’s longer than that. I think an inch or two off her hair would look better. I love that green dress she was wearing upturead. After some early mistakes, I feel like her clothes are pretty good and she’s toned down the makeup since the scaramucci days, which is also good.