Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how these high Numbers are possible for people under 35-40 in only a 401k, the max per year isn't enough to get over $1mm even if you were maxing out every year.... what am I missing?!
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how these high Numbers are possible for people under 35-40 in only a 401k, the max per year isn't enough to get over $1mm even if you were maxing out every year.... what am I missing?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Right but the PP didn't say he or she was not maxing out in order to invest in something else. They are simply spending the money and that's why they aren't maxing out.
No, PP has specifically talked about taxation ("Every penny you don't contribute to max out is being taxed") rather than saving vs. spending.
Anonymous wrote:
Right but the PP didn't say he or she was not maxing out in order to invest in something else. They are simply spending the money and that's why they aren't maxing out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You should still max out for the tax benefit. It's some of the only tax free money you can earn. Every penny you don't contribute to max out is being taxed.
It is not tax-free, it is tax-deferred. So the issue is your present tax bracket vs. future at the time of withdrawal.
Whether that benefits you depends on a combination of three factors:
1. Present tax law. vs. future tax law at the time of withdrawal
2. Your present state jurisdiction vs future tax bracket at the time of withdrawal
3. Your present income vs. future income at the time of withdrawal
How those factors play out in concert somewhat depends on you (factors 2 and 3), but the key factor 1 is mostly out of your control.
For many people, the income in retirement may exceed that early in life (esp. considering the child deductions and exemptions)>
Then the Factor 3 would work against pre-tax savings.
The factor 2 may work both ways. If I earn in MA or CA (high state tax bracket) but intend to retire in FL - yes, for pre-tax savings
If I earn in WA (no state tax) but intend to retire in CA (say for family reasons), the other way around.
Most importantly, I would project that (with the current US budget situation) the taxes in 10 - 20 years are bound to go up rather than down.
Then you are better paying now and having funds after-tax.
The black swan is the security of 401(K) balances as such in the current and projected budget situation - learn what happened in Argentina.
You think that can't in USA. Well, with our politics now increasingly resembling South America, I am not so sure.
That in principle applies to both pre- and after-tax, although more likely to pre-tax as those are easier to confiscate
quasi-legally through changes in tax law.
The combination of all these factors are hard to handicap 30 years into the future.
So I am splitting 401(K) about 50/50 between pre- and after-tax, but putting into real estate more than both.
The history (of South America, but not only) shows that throwing someone out of a home/homes is MUCH harder politically and practically
than taking money in some account (sure, the first happened too but usually only for few extremely wealthy "latifundistas".
That historical memory is, btw, why immigrants to USA (esp. Asians and South Americans) are so focused on RE rather than financial instruments.
Anonymous wrote:
You should still max out for the tax benefit. It's some of the only tax free money you can earn. Every penny you don't contribute to max out is being taxed.
Anonymous wrote:
I don't understand why equity would be more important than cash. You can't eat equity.
Anonymous wrote:Very important missing piece (may be more than 401 K) is home equity.
People mention some 30 or 100 K in cash, isn't equity more important.
We are 46 and 41 y. old. The 401 K is fairly modest (just over 500 K between two), but equity is close to 800 K (between two homes).
We started in USA as immigrants with nothing at about 30.
Anonymous wrote:I don't understand how these high Numbers are possible for people under 35-40 in only a 401k, the max per year isn't enough to get over $1mm even if you were maxing out every year.... what am I missing?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:42 yo - my individual retirement accounts (Rollover IRA, Roth IRA, SEP IRA) total: $266,790.32
40 yo spouse (401k, Roth IRA, and Rollover IRA): $117,926.60
We save about 12% of our pre-tax income for retirement each year, and my wife has a pension plan that is pretty secure and has a solid payout at retirement age.
1 12yo son - 2 semesters (1 yr of tuition and fees at 4-year university) of Virginia Pre-paid 529 and $10,514.74 in regular Virginia 529
Savings in cash/cash equivalent: $89,412.25
New financial planner said we're "good, but not wow." We have an aggressive and achievable plan for college savings to purchase 2 semesters/year for next 3 years (currently $15,650/year) + $8,000/year in regular 529 (to max our Virginia tax deduction). This feels fine. Not sweating it.
What's you HHI?
~$300k. I am an independent consultant and my income varies $180k-$210k. 2016 HHI was $312k
I'd absolutely increase the 12 percent. You should be maxing it out at 312k. No excuse.
Probably. That income level is only the last 3 years, though - spent early 30s with both of us in grad school then worked our way up and started seeing a major ROI on those education investments relatively recently. We also have $250k in home equity and little consumer debt. We have simple tastes and will happily live on a lot less and downsize in retirement. There are other things to worry about/enjoy than building a monstrous nest egg that could be useless if we drop off a cliff and shed our mortal coils pre-retirement. Also don't believe in the save-till-you-drop approach then total retirement - I work with lots of people in their 60s and even 70s still doing independent consulting - voluntarily, for mental challenge and periodic income - in my area of consulting.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:42 yo - my individual retirement accounts (Rollover IRA, Roth IRA, SEP IRA) total: $266,790.32
40 yo spouse (401k, Roth IRA, and Rollover IRA): $117,926.60
We save about 12% of our pre-tax income for retirement each year, and my wife has a pension plan that is pretty secure and has a solid payout at retirement age.
1 12yo son - 2 semesters (1 yr of tuition and fees at 4-year university) of Virginia Pre-paid 529 and $10,514.74 in regular Virginia 529
Savings in cash/cash equivalent: $89,412.25
New financial planner said we're "good, but not wow." We have an aggressive and achievable plan for college savings to purchase 2 semesters/year for next 3 years (currently $15,650/year) + $8,000/year in regular 529 (to max our Virginia tax deduction). This feels fine. Not sweating it.
What's you HHI?
~$300k. I am an independent consultant and my income varies $180k-$210k. 2016 HHI was $312k
I'd absolutely increase the 12 percent. You should be maxing it out at 312k. No excuse.