Anonymous wrote:Just curious. Does anyone have any sense how much a brand new high school would cost? I know that last meeting sounded discouraging but I thought at the end of the slides (still want to know what deck they were using since tuned in late to meeting on tv) they mentioned examining VHC property.
I just want to know how much that would cost v. the HB Woodlawn construction. Yes, PP, i know that there was a battle over the Stafford land some months back. But, it still doesn't make much sense to allocate almost $100 million for 775 seats when there are so many kids all across Arlington who won't have adequate space in their schools.
Why should we prop up such a small number of kids (who were just lucky in some random lottery drawing) when all kids need basic classrooms/schools?
Anonymous wrote:Just curious. Does anyone have any sense how much a brand new high school would cost? I know that last meeting sounded discouraging but I thought at the end of the slides (still want to know what deck they were using since tuned in late to meeting on tv) they mentioned examining VHC property.
I just want to know how much that would cost v. the HB Woodlawn construction. Yes, PP, i know that there was a battle over the Stafford land some months back. But, it still doesn't make much sense to allocate almost $100 million for 775 seats when there are so many kids all across Arlington who won't have adequate space in their schools.
Why should we prop up such a small number of kids (who were just lucky in some random lottery drawing) when all kids need basic classrooms/schools?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yawn. Schools seem fine to me.
Signed,
Parent of first grader with plans to move in two years.
Why bother posting this? This adds absolutely nothing to the purpose of this thread.
Anonymous wrote:Yawn. Schools seem fine to me.
Signed,
Parent of first grader with plans to move in two years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Did you hear the eagerness in the school board member who was marveling at how economic a solution flex scheduling is?
Hey, how about the high schools get APS and county space for classrooms during the school day, and school and county employees work a flex schedule -- late and early shifts?
This is really depressing. If we had acted earlier, could we have made them find the land to build a 4th high school?
You can't make them find land. There's only so much in Arlington.
Had parents been willing to compromise more, it might (MIGHT) have been possible to earn the county's goodwill by reducing demands for funds and land: Affordable housing on the Buck property, a high school (or building that included a high school) on the VHC property. Giving up 1:1 and FLES, going back to early release but providing a bigger subsidy for extended day for low-income households.
Every time you demand that the county "fully fund" a bloated budget, you're cementing your reputation as grabby.
It is NOT grabby to see a high school deficit of 2,700 seats and think "hey, a new high school would be appropriate here." It is not grabby to think flex scheduling and internet learning are not good enough solutions to a seat crisis when we have just committed to spending $100M on 750 high school seats.
How about we just scrap HB and allocate that money towards a 4th high school?
I just hope that HB has to implement double shifts and internet learning too. For $100M for so few students, they should have triple shifts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, looks like it's private for us.
a win win win for you and both the County Board an School Board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just keep wondering whether the message sunk in to the County Board that their plans for continuing to increase density are likely to impact the schools so that instead of 6.400 elementary, middle and high school seats needed in the next ten years it could be 10,000 - and that is before the plans are implemented to develop all of Lee Highway. If the school population trends and the increased density continue - and that certainly seems likely - then how can there not be a fourth high school?
You put APAH, AHC, Nauck people, FARMS, and illegals into the 5:00 AM, 9:00 PM, and "online remedial" classes. Make things so bad that they leave for Southeast DC or Prince William County, and take their minimal votes with them.
Anonymous wrote:
I just hope that HB has to implement double shifts and internet learning too. For $100M for so few students, they should have triple shifts.
Anonymous wrote:I just keep wondering whether the message sunk in to the County Board that their plans for continuing to increase density are likely to impact the schools so that instead of 6.400 elementary, middle and high school seats needed in the next ten years it could be 10,000 - and that is before the plans are implemented to develop all of Lee Highway. If the school population trends and the increased density continue - and that certainly seems likely - then how can there not be a fourth high school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: Did you hear the eagerness in the school board member who was marveling at how economic a solution flex scheduling is?
Hey, how about the high schools get APS and county space for classrooms during the school day, and school and county employees work a flex schedule -- late and early shifts?
This is really depressing. If we had acted earlier, could we have made them find the land to build a 4th high school?
You can't make them find land. There's only so much in Arlington.
Had parents been willing to compromise more, it might (MIGHT) have been possible to earn the county's goodwill by reducing demands for funds and land: Affordable housing on the Buck property, a high school (or building that included a high school) on the VHC property. Giving up 1:1 and FLES, going back to early release but providing a bigger subsidy for extended day for low-income households.
Every time you demand that the county "fully fund" a bloated budget, you're cementing your reputation as grabby.
It is NOT grabby to see a high school deficit of 2,700 seats and think "hey, a new high school would be appropriate here." It is not grabby to think flex scheduling and internet learning are not good enough solutions to a seat crisis when we have just committed to spending $100M on 750 high school seats.