Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People love making these kinds of generalizations but I think real life has many exceptions to this. I work in a corporation with thousands of employees. There are a fair number of hot and appealing women in their 40s and older, and many plain, uninteresting 20 something girls. Young definitely does not always win out for women, and this is a mans point of view.
I find that a lot of the young women on the millennial generation are quite plain in comparison with 20 somethings from previous generations.
Anonymous wrote:People love making these kinds of generalizations but I think real life has many exceptions to this. I work in a corporation with thousands of employees. There are a fair number of hot and appealing women in their 40s and older, and many plain, uninteresting 20 something girls. Young definitely does not always win out for women, and this is a mans point of view.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Eh, that goes both ways. A man in his 20s with money and a six pack is hotter than a man in his 50s with money and a six pack.
I disagree. A man in his 20s with money and a six pack probably came by it easily and has a lot of time to let it go to his head and lose it all.
A man in his 50s with money and six pack probably worked hard for it and is more likely to keep it.
Doesn't matter. We are talking solely about physical appearance. All other things being equal- money, abs, work ethic- a man in his 20s is more attractive than a man in his 50s.
That guy in his 20s with money is a unicorn, as in one in a thousand. He will have women lining up to bang him. Best of luck!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Eh, that goes both ways. A man in his 20s with money and a six pack is hotter than a man in his 50s with money and a six pack.
I disagree. A man in his 20s with money and a six pack probably came by it easily and has a lot of time to let it go to his head and lose it all.
A man in his 50s with money and six pack probably worked hard for it and is more likely to keep it.
Doesn't matter. We are talking solely about physical appearance. All other things being equal- money, abs, work ethic- a man in his 20s is more attractive than a man in his 50s.
Anonymous wrote:I have two friends in the pet industry. They work with pet stores, groomers, and go to dog and cat shows. Their ideal (and most common) customer is a single, never-married woman 30's and older. They have advanced in their career so they have money to spend, and they spend a lot of it on their pets.
I know every time I've tagged along with him to a groomer's salon, every client in there (the owner, not the dog) was female.
So the whole "cat lady" thing does seem accurate, based on the industry information and what I've observed.