Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not comparing them to wealthy NW neighborhoods but other charters:
DCI - proficient (4 or above)
ELA 36
Math 32
Cap City
ELA - 33
Math 29
Basis
ELA 68
Math 60
Wash Latin
ELA 68
Math 49
Thanks DC Bilingual!
That's really unfair![]()
Anyone know the breakdown of kids by feeders and not?
I hope that information isn't available. People shouldn't have the opportunity to single out/scapegoat certain feeder schools.
Wow. You would suppress information to "protect" people and control behavior? Welcome to America 2016. I thought open data in education was going to expose injustice and inequality and make us all accountable. Guess not.
I am.unaware of any secondary school in the country that breaks down test scores by elementary feeder. That seems like a recipe for divisiveness, as well as a bureaucratic nightmare for the staff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm not sure what DCI is not understanding about the t ch focus not being appropriate. It's really simple, so it's disappointing it hasn't been nipped in the bud. Working adults aren't allowed to whip out their cell phones wildly bully, so why on earth children at school would be allowed is beyond me. This poor behavior will follow these kids to the workplace and make their futures harder. This is why we're not inclined to go to DCI after LAMB. Sad, really. But, if DCI can't figure out something so simple, what else are they negligent with?
Your premise is ridiculous. The school does filter content and block apps on the school provided chromebooks. But your child's phone is your responsibility. If your child doesn't have the self-control not to use is during class, why one earth would you give your child a smart phone at all? You realize there are phones without data or wifi, don't you? And a myriad of controls you can set if you can't resist buying your kid an expensive iphone. But perhaps you just don't know how to say no? Try parenting.
Anonymous wrote:I don't think the bad behavior is because of tech and phones. I think it's how they were raised. Disrespectful, loud, disruptive, bad kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Today's story from DCI was about kids punching the pictures hanging in the hallways. Does this occur at other MS?
Typical MS rowdiness.
Anonymous wrote:Today's story from DCI was about kids punching the pictures hanging in the hallways. Does this occur at other MS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Not comparing them to wealthy NW neighborhoods but other charters:
DCI - proficient (4 or above)
ELA 36
Math 32
Cap City
ELA - 33
Math 29
Basis
ELA 68
Math 60
Wash Latin
ELA 68
Math 49
Thanks DC Bilingual!
That's really unfair![]()
Anyone know the breakdown of kids by feeders and not?
I hope that information isn't available. People shouldn't have the opportunity to single out/scapegoat certain feeder schools.
Wow. You would suppress information to "protect" people and control behavior? Welcome to America 2016. I thought open data in education was going to expose injustice and inequality and make us all accountable. Guess not.