Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But the misguided fools can only be misguided fools if evidence shows them to be. If you are going to imply they are such, shouldn't YOU provide the contrary evidence?
As for evidence, its there if you want to know.
Sure, the evidence is in the belief system itself: by their own admission, what they have is faith, which is belief with insufficient evidence. If a grown ass man told you he believed in Santa Claus as a real actual person described in the stories, complete with elves and reindeers who helped him deliver gifts all over the world, that's what I'd call a misguided fool. What makes the Abrahamic God any different?
Also, the original claim isn't that they are misguided, but that there is a God. That they are misguided is simply a reaction, a logical observation of those who believe in a supernatural being on insufficient evidence.
Anonymous wrote:
In the "earth-was-believed-to-be-flat" theory, groundbreaking revelation ultimately disproved their belief. There is no ground breaking revelation to disprove the existence of God.
Anonymous wrote: All believers in God know that the truth will be manifest on the Day of Judgment.
Anonymous wrote:Many people who were former staunch atheists have had NDE's which turned them into believers.
Anonymous wrote:The creation of life by random events is so unlikely that it has never been repeated. The statistical probability of such random occurrences that just happened to produce intelligent life is absurdly low, almost making it impossible.
Anonymous wrote:
Moreover, the perfection of the human body is so astounding that it is ridiculous to assume it occured by chance. There must be a Creator.
Anonymous wrote:
The Quran mentioned how mankind was created, mentioned sperm, the early gestational periods, mentioned planets that travelled in orbits, that almost all life forms come in pairs of male and female. It mentioned that salt water and fresh water were kept separate with a barrier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:But if you don't even believe in such rubbish, can't understand why you can't dismiss such people anyway.
I can't dismiss them. Because they will come to me and force aspects of their beliefs on me. For example, I mentioned I can't draw caricatures of Mohammad without being fearful of my safety, or my first amendment rights. Whether I am for or against abortion, some people vote on this issue based on their religious belief, these votes turn into laws, which directly impacts what I can or can't legally do. And of course as it has been pointed out repeatedly, we can't get any politicians elected if they claim to be atheist.
So no, I can't just dismiss them because they won't let me dismiss them. They insist on imposing their views on non-believers.
Anonymous wrote:But the misguided fools can only be misguided fools if evidence shows them to be. If you are going to imply they are such, shouldn't YOU provide the contrary evidence?
As for evidence, its there if you want to know.
Anonymous wrote:But if you don't even believe in such rubbish, can't understand why you can't dismiss such people anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My humble suggestion would be to become more devout in your own faith of Chrustianity or Judaism first. The devout Christians and Jews I know are kind and compassionate people who have never been accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards my faith.
This is the argument equivalent of moving the goal post. Don't like Islam? It's because you are not devout enough. Only those who are not accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards Islam are devout enough.
What is it you hope to hear? I am a practicing Muslim and I love my faith. 1.6 bil people practice Islam, probably 1.5 of them peacefully. They can't all be misguided fools. I am not an expert in it but know enough to refute your assertions. If you were sincerely curious, you would call those with far greater understanding. I am comfortable with the points I made. Sorry you aren't convinced.
Why not? At one point, most of the world believed the earth was flat, or that the sun revolved around the earth, or that there was some rational validity to the claims of a royal bloodline in terms of nation ruling. Humans are currently ignorant of the true cause of consciousness, the beginnings of our universe, and a multitude of other things we wonder about. We don't just throw our hands up and say "well, we don't know, therefore God". As human knowledge and literacy rates increase, religion has been seceding ground in return. It is in fact the current argument that the Muslim world is in such turmoil compared to Christian countries is because it has lower literacy rates and never went through a period of reformation where the belief system was allowed to be modernized. This is why Christianity, while still a larger religion by practitioners than Islam, does not have a problem with fundamentalism nearly to the degree of Islam. When denominations like the Westboro Baptist Church voice their bigotry, they are ridiculed and shunned. Meanwhile, Islam apologists try to divert the conversation of the Charlie Hebdo attack away from fundamentalism and towards one of economic and political oppression. Problems are multi-faceted, I agree, but you lose credibility when you refuse to address the face value of facts and instead insist that there is some other hidden meaning/cause, which only an Islam authority can reveal correctly. It's a circular argument, ignorant at best, disingenuous at worst.
In the "earth-was-believed-to-be-flat" theory, groundbreaking revelation ultimately disproved their belief. There is no ground breaking revelation to disprove the existence of God. So you should withhold your accusation until the existence of God is disproved.
All believers in God know that the truth will be manifest on the Day of Judgment. Many people who were former staunch atheists have had NDE's which turned them into believers. The creation of life by random events is so unlikely that it has never been repeated. The statistical probability of such random occurrences that just happened to produce intelligent life is absurdly low, almost making it impossible. Moreover, the perfection of the human body is so astounding that it is ridiculous to assume it occured by chance. There must be a Creator. The Quran mentioned how mankind was created, mentioned sperm, the early gestational periods, mentioned planets that travelled in orbits, that almost all life forms come in pairs of male and female. It mentioned that salt water and fresh water were kept separate with a barrier.
I am not angry at others who think differently. I am angry that they think their belief in magic applies to me and that I am also subject to the same magic.
You need not believe in what others believe. But why so angry if others think differently?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My humble suggestion would be to become more devout in your own faith of Chrustianity or Judaism first. The devout Christians and Jews I know are kind and compassionate people who have never been accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards my faith.
We all need to become more devout before we can accept that your one true faith is damning us to hell? Wha??
Not what I said. I said first try to learn about and love your own faith, because you disapprove of Islam. Heaven is open to Christians and Jews too. The goal is to go to Heaven, not necessarily as a Muslim.
Not according to the Quran it isn't. Besides, I am an Atheist. I've read more of the Quran than probably most of what you'd call faithful believers of Islam. My goal isn't to go to Heaven, but to have people tend to their imaginary friends on their own time, in their own space, without insisting that I do the same.
Who insisted you do the same? It is quite strange how upset you are over the text of a book you don't even believe in.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My humble suggestion would be to become more devout in your own faith of Chrustianity or Judaism first. The devout Christians and Jews I know are kind and compassionate people who have never been accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards my faith.
This is the argument equivalent of moving the goal post. Don't like Islam? It's because you are not devout enough. Only those who are not accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards Islam are devout enough. [/quote
+1. I've read the Quran, Hadith and other sources both pro and against. After this effort, I reject Islam because I find many aspects incompatible with my values, or the values I'd attribute to a God. That makes me a careful thinker. It does not make me an "Islamophobe" who "vilifies" Islam.
If you are a careful thinker after reading these in English, then what are Muslims who embraced Islam after studying the Quran in Arabic and studying islamic history also?? Wouldn't they be considered vigilant in their study and even more careful in their thinking?
I do have great respect for people who follow Islam after much study, or who are unable to read the Quran, but are essentially following the golden rule.
However, I'm sick of your whoppers. You keep falling back on "millions of other people think this, so I'm right and you're an Islamophobe." OK then. As we've already discussed, most have NOT read the Quran in Arabic. Most have not read the Quran at all, let alone studied history or interpretations, because they're illiterate. Most were introduced to the faith -- and this is true for most faiths -- by their parents and culture.
Sure, a few converts fell for the false gambit that "Islam is just like Christianity except we don't believe Jesus is divine." I see you yourself have been pushing that whopper here on DCUM just a few pages ago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My humble suggestion would be to become more devout in your own faith of Chrustianity or Judaism first. The devout Christians and Jews I know are kind and compassionate people who have never been accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards my faith.
We all need to become more devout before we can accept that your one true faith is damning us to hell? Wha??
Not what I said. I said first try to learn about and love your own faith, because you disapprove of Islam. Heaven is open to Christians and Jews too. The goal is to go to Heaven, not necessarily as a Muslim.
Not according to the Quran it isn't. Besides, I am an Atheist. I've read more of the Quran than probably most of what you'd call faithful believers of Islam. My goal isn't to go to Heaven, but to have people tend to their imaginary friends on their own time, in their own space, without insisting that I do the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My humble suggestion would be to become more devout in your own faith of Chrustianity or Judaism first. The devout Christians and Jews I know are kind and compassionate people who have never been accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards my faith.
This is the argument equivalent of moving the goal post. Don't like Islam? It's because you are not devout enough. Only those who are not accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards Islam are devout enough. [/quote
+1. I've read the Quran, Hadith and other sources both pro and against. After this effort, I reject Islam because I find many aspects incompatible with my values, or the values I'd attribute to a God. That makes me a careful thinker. It does not make me an "Islamophobe" who "vilifies" Islam.
If you are a careful thinker after reading these in English, then what are Muslims who embraced Islam after studying the Quran in Arabic and studying islamic history also?? Wouldn't they be considered vigilant in their study and even more careful in their thinking?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My humble suggestion would be to become more devout in your own faith of Chrustianity or Judaism first. The devout Christians and Jews I know are kind and compassionate people who have never been accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards my faith.
This is the argument equivalent of moving the goal post. Don't like Islam? It's because you are not devout enough. Only those who are not accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards Islam are devout enough.
What is it you hope to hear? I am a practicing Muslim and I love my faith. 1.6 bil people practice Islam, probably 1.5 of them peacefully. They can't all be misguided fools. I am not an expert in it but know enough to refute your assertions. If you were sincerely curious, you would call those with far greater understanding. I am comfortable with the points I made. Sorry you aren't convinced.
Why not? At one point, most of the world believed the earth was flat, or that the sun revolved around the earth, or that there was some rational validity to the claims of a royal bloodline in terms of nation ruling. Humans are currently ignorant of the true cause of consciousness, the beginnings of our universe, and a multitude of other things we wonder about. We don't just throw our hands up and say "well, we don't know, therefore God". As human knowledge and literacy rates increase, religion has been seceding ground in return. It is in fact the current argument that the Muslim world is in such turmoil compared to Christian countries is because it has lower literacy rates and never went through a period of reformation where the belief system was allowed to be modernized. This is why Christianity, while still a larger religion by practitioners than Islam, does not have a problem with fundamentalism nearly to the degree of Islam. When denominations like the Westboro Baptist Church voice their bigotry, they are ridiculed and shunned. Meanwhile, Islam apologists try to divert the conversation of the Charlie Hebdo attack away from fundamentalism and towards one of economic and political oppression. Problems are multi-faceted, I agree, but you lose credibility when you refuse to address the face value of facts and instead insist that there is some other hidden meaning/cause, which only an Islam authority can reveal correctly. It's a circular argument, ignorant at best, disingenuous at worst.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My humble suggestion would be to become more devout in your own faith of Chrustianity or Judaism first. The devout Christians and Jews I know are kind and compassionate people who have never been accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards my faith.
This is the argument equivalent of moving the goal post. Don't like Islam? It's because you are not devout enough. Only those who are not accusatory, suspicious, or hostile towards Islam are devout enough. [/quote
+1. I've read the Quran, Hadith and other sources both pro and against. After this effort, I reject Islam because I find many aspects incompatible with my values, or the values I'd attribute to a God. That makes me a careful thinker. It does not make me an "Islamophobe" who "vilifies" Islam.