Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None, I would choose Hearst. Small class size, awesome new facilities, emphasis on the arts, diverse school population, engaged parent community where you get to know everyone. Deal/Wilson feeder and almost every house in-bound is easily walkable to all three schools.
We recently went through a house hunt and after visiting all the area schools we only looked IB for Hearst and Eaton. Luckily for us we found a place for Hearst.
Hearst is awful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:None, I would choose Hearst. Small class size, awesome new facilities, emphasis on the arts, diverse school population, engaged parent community where you get to know everyone. Deal/Wilson feeder and almost every house in-bound is easily walkable to all three schools.
We recently went through a house hunt and after visiting all the area schools we only looked IB for Hearst and Eaton. Luckily for us we found a place for Hearst.
Hearst is awful.
Anonymous wrote:Hearst is basically an EOTP school that just happens to be WOTP.
Anonymous wrote:None, I would choose Hearst. Small class size, awesome new facilities, emphasis on the arts, diverse school population, engaged parent community where you get to know everyone. Deal/Wilson feeder and almost every house in-bound is easily walkable to all three schools.
We recently went through a house hunt and after visiting all the area schools we only looked IB for Hearst and Eaton. Luckily for us we found a place for Hearst.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Based on the above postings, Janney seems to be the most sought after of the J-K-L-single M schools.
It's, by far, the most accessible of the schools. We're in bounds for one of the other JKLM schools. I honestly think our IB school is better than Janney, but I'd probably prefer to send my kids to Janney since the location (on top of a metro station) is so damn attractive.
Anonymous wrote:Based on the above postings, Janney seems to be the most sought after of the J-K-L-single M schools.
Anonymous wrote:Based on the above postings, Janney seems to be the most sought after of the J-K-L-single M schools.
Anonymous wrote:^^ this posting went from interesting to slightly funny to absolutely depressing. Demeaning tiny elementary kids who go to fine schools is deplorable. It seems like the parents are really the bullies. How do you discipline your kids when they berate others?
DCPS is one of the lower performing districts in the country. There is plenty of work that needs to be done to improve the schools. The ones that are being discussed are highly desirable within this system.
We always wanted to sent our child to public school for the early years because of the exposure to different kinds of people who share our values that a quality education should be available to all. What I am seeing here is unchecked privilege and a sense of entitlement that is sickening and shouldn't be tolerated in any school system, let alone a public system.
We are seriously thinking of an elite private because the values of humility, citizenship, and commitment to diversity may be much stronger than anything I am seeing on these boards.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So-- what is the answer? How will Janney accommodate the mandatory 10%?
What is the plan if not to change the boundary?
Get a waiver on the grounds that the school is already over-capacity.
There are other schools at or much more over-capacity. Why should Janney be treated differently?
So, what's the plan for good neighborhood schools that are over capacity? The only lever is to reduce OOB enrollment, but some of these schools have barely any OOB students. So where does that leave those same schools after they've tried to tweak their boundaries to accommodate some new set aside? Eventually tell neighborhood families to send their kids EOTP?
What about Murch? They are over capacity but choosing to accept OOB. There is no central planning in DCPS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So-- what is the answer? How will Janney accommodate the mandatory 10%?
What is the plan if not to change the boundary?
Get a waiver on the grounds that the school is already over-capacity.
There are other schools at or much more over-capacity. Why should Janney be treated differently?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So-- what is the answer? How will Janney accommodate the mandatory 10%?
What is the plan if not to change the boundary?
Get a waiver on the grounds that the school is already over-capacity.
There are other schools at or much more over-capacity. Why should Janney be treated differently?
So, what's the plan for good neighborhood schools that are over capacity? The only lever is to reduce OOB enrollment, but some of these schools have barely any OOB students. So where does that leave those same schools after they've tried to tweak their boundaries to accommodate some new set aside? Eventually tell neighborhood families to send their kids EOTP?