Anonymous wrote:I encourage all of you to hang out with actual, honest-to-goodness teenagers some time. You might find your current opinions to be a little provincial after that.
Anonymous wrote:RE WIS - both middle and high school students can use devices/go online during lunch. FWIW Burke is same for Middle and High School.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
"Unfettered" access means access to the internet and cell phones during school breaks throughout the day. It also appears that students can access the internet during class time! Who in the world thinks that this is a good idea?!?
I do. I'm a high school science teacher and here are some reasons why I think this is a good idea.
What school do you teach at?
Probably DCI.
DCI doesn't have high school grade levels.
It's possible that she is a middle school teacher at DCI, but she's trying to hide her identity by saying she's a high school teacher. It's shocking, I know, but people sometimes lie on DCUM.
If she's who I think she is, she teachers AP science courses at a top HS in Montgomery County. You however, are most likely a concern troll.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
"Unfettered" access means access to the internet and cell phones during school breaks throughout the day. It also appears that students can access the internet during class time! Who in the world thinks that this is a good idea?!?
I do. I'm a high school science teacher and here are some reasons why I think this is a good idea.
First and foremost: text books are horrible. This is especially true when you are dealing with subjects that add new content all the time. They are out of date by the time they reach the shelves, so there is a constant need for revisions. They are expensive. My textbooks (required by the state) cost $90 each. Textbooks are written by standardized test writers to meet the lowest common denominator of needs in the largest number of markets possible. The only non-technology alternative is to create paper copies of collections of readings. Is that a good use of time or resources when the material could be read online without a copier?
The technology I use isn't just to read the assignments or to submit documents of answers they type. My google classroom creates a permanent, accessible archive of everything we've done. A kid who needed hospitalization? A kid who is sick from his meds? A death in the family? New student from another country just arrived? Went through a rough spot and need to review? A parent or a tutor or a big brother wants to help a struggling student? None of it could get done efficiently if at all without my google classroom and the rich, varied content I put on it. All of these situations and much more have happened to me in the past month, as they do (in one form or another) every year.
As for cell phones, I collect some of my best student data from a handful or apps that I use with them. My favorite by far is a cell phone app called Exittix. I create questions and the kids respond to them on their phones. It can be a quick quiz or a question or two to spot check for understanding. All of the student results are disaggregated so I know who/how many have mastered each question. It also tells me how long it took them to answer (if I think they cheated and looked it up). I can even arrange the questions to sort for common misconceptions. Kids also take pictures of projects, film presentations and check their grades with their phones. I send them assignment reminders and messages about things via a group text app. I flip the classroom whenever possible and I film myself with my phone sometimes.
These are just a couple of the things that happen in a technology infused classroom, but I have many more are part of my repertoire. Unfortunately, I don't have a computer lab or dedicated devices for everyone so it severely limits what I can do.
I should clarify that I do not support wild, unsupervised access to kids. As a professional, it is my duty to monitor them, guide them, help them choose properly and keep them involved in learning. As a future DCI parent I hope to see substantive training and support for the teachers to implement the technology well. Since our family isn't there yet I can't comment on whether or not that training is there. I would just caution people from interpreting ALL of DCI based on the anecdotes of a few 'tweens as filtered through their parents on an anonymous listserv.
What school do you teach at?
Probably DCI.
Shut the f*ck up, troll. Obviously she's not a DCI teacher, that's quite clear from the context to anyone who can read English.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, PP was joking, right?
Security breach, it's real.
They can't hold school if the computers don't work. Who is teaching - teachers or computers. So much for the smoke they blew up the PP's ass about 50% class time on computers.
No way is this real. Will never think again about this school if it is.
No. The no school
Today has nothing to do with the chrome books. Today was previously scheduled as a non school day. It has been on the calendar since the start of school. Merely a coincidence
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
"Unfettered" access means access to the internet and cell phones during school breaks throughout the day. It also appears that students can access the internet during class time! Who in the world thinks that this is a good idea?!?
I do. I'm a high school science teacher and here are some reasons why I think this is a good idea.
What school do you teach at?
Probably DCI.
DCI doesn't have high school grade levels.
It's possible that she is a middle school teacher at DCI, but she's trying to hide her identity by saying she's a high school teacher. It's shocking, I know, but people sometimes lie on DCUM.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
"Unfettered" access means access to the internet and cell phones during school breaks throughout the day. It also appears that students can access the internet during class time! Who in the world thinks that this is a good idea?!?
I do. I'm a high school science teacher and here are some reasons why I think this is a good idea.
First and foremost: text books are horrible. This is especially true when you are dealing with subjects that add new content all the time. They are out of date by the time they reach the shelves, so there is a constant need for revisions. They are expensive. My textbooks (required by the state) cost $90 each. Textbooks are written by standardized test writers to meet the lowest common denominator of needs in the largest number of markets possible. The only non-technology alternative is to create paper copies of collections of readings. Is that a good use of time or resources when the material could be read online without a copier?
The technology I use isn't just to read the assignments or to submit documents of answers they type. My google classroom creates a permanent, accessible archive of everything we've done. A kid who needed hospitalization? A kid who is sick from his meds? A death in the family? New student from another country just arrived? Went through a rough spot and need to review? A parent or a tutor or a big brother wants to help a struggling student? None of it could get done efficiently if at all without my google classroom and the rich, varied content I put on it. All of these situations and much more have happened to me in the past month, as they do (in one form or another) every year.
As for cell phones, I collect some of my best student data from a handful or apps that I use with them. My favorite by far is a cell phone app called Exittix. I create questions and the kids respond to them on their phones. It can be a quick quiz or a question or two to spot check for understanding. All of the student results are disaggregated so I know who/how many have mastered each question. It also tells me how long it took them to answer (if I think they cheated and looked it up). I can even arrange the questions to sort for common misconceptions. Kids also take pictures of projects, film presentations and check their grades with their phones. I send them assignment reminders and messages about things via a group text app. I flip the classroom whenever possible and I film myself with my phone sometimes.
These are just a couple of the things that happen in a technology infused classroom, but I have many more are part of my repertoire. Unfortunately, I don't have a computer lab or dedicated devices for everyone so it severely limits what I can do.
I should clarify that I do not support wild, unsupervised access to kids. As a professional, it is my duty to monitor them, guide them, help them choose properly and keep them involved in learning. As a future DCI parent I hope to see substantive training and support for the teachers to implement the technology well. Since our family isn't there yet I can't comment on whether or not that training is there. I would just caution people from interpreting ALL of DCI based on the anecdotes of a few 'tweens as filtered through their parents on an anonymous listserv.
What school do you teach at?
Probably DCI.
Anonymous wrote:Kids are going to drink in college. Why don't we start them early on the theory that then they won't go crazy with it when they are on their own? Because their brains are developing and we want to give them a safe space to develop. Because there is no evidence (in fact to the contrary) that drinking in high school means less drinking risky in college.
Same with tech. On both scores.
Anonymous wrote:I have a hunch that 20:08 & 21:51 is a DCI admin. I recognize the dismissive language and tone. That or school she works at is earily similar. Ugh!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, PP was joking, right?
Security breach, it's real.
They can't hold school if the computers don't work. Who is teaching - teachers or computers. So much for the smoke they blew up the PP's ass about 50% class time on computers.
No way is this real. Will never think again about this school if it is.