Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Um, nice try PP.
Let me dumb this down for you:
SAHM Sally has two precious snowflakes in elementary school. They get on the bus at 8:30, and they get home at 3:30...except on the days they have after school activities.
WOHM Wanda also has two kids in elementary school. Same bus schedule. Wanda gets home from her FT lawyer gig in DC by 5pm (she heads in super early while DH gets the kids on the bus in the morning, so she avoids rush hour and can get home at a reasonable time).
Wanda spends 40 hours a week kicking ass at her day job.
Sally spends her day at the gym, running errands and cleaning (actually, scratch that...Sally has a cleaning service).
If you fail to recognize that one lady is working two jobs while the other lady has a cakewalk, then we are done here...obviously you are delusional.
I love you!![]()
Signed,
Lawyer Mommy
Anonymous wrote:Um, nice try PP.
Let me dumb this down for you:
SAHM Sally has two precious snowflakes in elementary school. They get on the bus at 8:30, and they get home at 3:30...except on the days they have after school activities.
WOHM Wanda also has two kids in elementary school. Same bus schedule. Wanda gets home from her FT lawyer gig in DC by 5pm (she heads in super early while DH gets the kids on the bus in the morning, so she avoids rush hour and can get home at a reasonable time).
Wanda spends 40 hours a week kicking ass at her day job.
Sally spends her day at the gym, running errands and cleaning (actually, scratch that...Sally has a cleaning service).
If you fail to recognize that one lady is working two jobs while the other lady has a cakewalk, then we are done here...obviously you are delusional.
Anonymous wrote:Any WOHMs willing to guess how much time they spend at work dealing with home issues? (Like scheduling contractors, ordering whatever from Amazon, managing finances, searching online for clothes for the whole family for an upcoming out of town wedding, looking at real estate, beach house booking, flights for Christmas break, etc etc).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I work outside of my house. I spend three hours a day commuting. I have a kid with some sort of delay we haven't figured out yet.
I couldn't care less.
You aren't hoping for the Mother of the Year award, are you. I hope child has someone who gives a damn about his problem.
Anonymous wrote:I work outside of my house. I spend three hours a day commuting. I have a kid with some sort of delay we haven't figured out yet.
I couldn't care less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well-put. Thanks! ~WOHM hereAnonymous wrote:I think most of the WOHMs are being deliberately obtuse. My nanny takes care of my children for 40 plus hours a week, I think we can all agree that is a fulltime job (as is working in a daycare, if that is how you get your childcare while you work) . However, when a SAHM does that, it's completely overlooked and everyone wants to argue that they do the same exact thing but also work. It's so plainly false it is ridiculous.
Do you really think there is no difference between taking care of kids NOT in your own house and taking care of your kids in your own house? Or being paid to do nothing but take care of kids, versus being allowed to take care of kids but do whatever else you need to do (as long as kids aren't neglected)?
What's the longest amount of time you've been home as the primary caregiver of your kids (i.e. no daycare or nanny) and how many do you have?
Questions like that give SAHMs a black eye.
I asked the question and I'm a WOHM. Just shocking to me that anyone has spent time taking care of their own kids thinks SAHM are just bringing their kids around with them in a whirlwind of shopping, spa and gym. Sounds like something a childless person would. I've had quite a few draining weekends with the kids where I look forward to the relative calm of the workplace.
BS on you being a WOHM. (Or if you are, then you are being obtuse.) You think someone who works outside the 40 hours a week cannot be someone "who has spent time taking care of their own kids"? Let's start with weekends and go on from there....
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think most of the WOHMs are being deliberately obtuse. My nanny takes care of my children for 40 plus hours a week, I think we can all agree that is a fulltime job (as is working in a daycare, if that is how you get your childcare while you work) . However, when a SAHM does that, it's completely overlooked and everyone wants to argue that they do the same exact thing but also work. It's so plainly false it is ridiculous.
You don't see the distinction between getting paid money to leave your house and go watch other people's children and staying at home to care for your own child? One is a job, one is a choice. They are different. That's why we have the distinctions. Some parents stay at home, some go to work, some can work from home. Every single one of those brings its own pros and cons, but they are all different from one another. Choosing to stay at home to care for your children is a choice and involves things that have to be done during the day but it isn't a job. Going to work involves involves things that may look similar to caring for your own child, but at the end of the day, it's a job.
What exactly is your point? Mine was that taking care of kids all day is hard work--whether or not you are paid for it. Are you arguing otherwise?
My point is that one is a job and one is a choice. Why are you acting like because they each take effort, they are the same. No, they're not. Do you think your nanny is going to show up out of the goodness of her heart to take care of your kids is you don't pay her? Hell no. She does it because you're paying her to do it. That's the difference. If I'm a carpenter by trade, and choose to build something in my back yard for the benefit of my family, I'm not "at work." I'm choosing to spend to my time doing that, but I'm not being paid. But I might be saving our family money by not paying someone else to do it. Why is this any different? Being a SAHP is not a job, regardless of how much effort is expende
\ at doing what's necessary during the day. I'm not digging at SAHPs. I respect what they do. It's just not a job. People do a disservice to SAHPs by trying to bring some kind of credibility to their day by referring to it as a job. It's credible in its own right, you don't need to act like it's equivalent to a job. Apples and oranges.
This is a weird tangent, no one said it was a job, only that it was hard work taking caring of young children. My nanny does pretty much what I did when I was at home (but not all the work I did around the house) and I acknowledge her hard work by paying her a lot of money. It was also hard work when I was doing it.
Are you new here?? People say that constantly. It's insane. "It's hard work taking care of children all day" is NOT the same as having outside employment, just as having outside employment is NOT the same as staying at home taking care of children all day. That's why the whole SAHM, WOHM, WAHM designations started in the first place. Because they each bring their own set of benefits and challenges. But SAHMs seem to feel the needs to "justify" themselves by equating what they do with having a job simply because it takes effort. It's stupid. Which is what this whole thread is about. And there are no judgments about any of it - I've been all of those designations, so I see the benefits and challenges of each. But I sure as hell never said what I did as a SAHM was a job.