Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After taxes (Fed and District), private school for 1 and second coming from local DCPS into private, saving for college, retirement, long term care, helping out family members etc. You feel really squeezed. Our brother inlaw in Houston get to take 3 or 4 vacations a year on about $300k a year, we can only take one real one and then have to huff it to Delaware for the weekend. It kind of is a rat race and we're stuck in this income zone for the foreseeable future (thanks biglaw profit slips).
Here, OP -- how about you consider this and then maybe you'll feel better about your life:
Really really not a helpful info graphic. Seriously, in all of TX or Montana, you can't pay your rent on minimum wage? That's a dead give away that this graphic is based on unrealistic ideals.
What single-income minimum wage worker is renting a 2 bedroom and expecting it to cost 1/3 of their income? The only group this picture speaks to is single parents with at least two kids who earn minimum wage and don't have other financial support. Otherwise, if you're renting a 2 bedroom apt, then you probably have at least two income earners. Kind of misleading to plop a picture of the entire US in the middle of the page and then only speak to a situation that makes sense for this very specific group. Most people on minimum wage are not renting a 2 bedroom as a solo breadwinner and they're certainly not expecting it to cost them 1/3 of their income.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After taxes (Fed and District), private school for 1 and second coming from local DCPS into private, saving for college, retirement, long term care, helping out family members etc. You feel really squeezed. Our brother inlaw in Houston get to take 3 or 4 vacations a year on about $300k a year, we can only take one real one and then have to huff it to Delaware for the weekend. It kind of is a rat race and we're stuck in this income zone for the foreseeable future (thanks biglaw profit slips).
Here, OP -- how about you consider this and then maybe you'll feel better about your life:
Anonymous wrote:It's funny that people think that those making 300K or more are just lazying around.
We are constantly working and because of that we have other expensese that need to be paid because we don't have time to do them.
1) Lawn care
2) Nanny
3) Childcare
4) Cleaning
etc...
Once you add all of those things up the lifestyle at 300k is not that comfortable. Maybe once we get into the 5-600k you start experience more disposable income, but at 300k you have to pay for a bunch of stuff you have to outsource.
On top of that around 300k you lose a lot of tax deductions so you are basically in limbo in terms of wreeping the benefits of making more. The tax benefits you lose at 3-400k are the same ones that you lose at 500k and higher.
Anonymous wrote:
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
Let's say you made very little like 40k a year.
Then at age 32 you started making 350k a year, have two kids and need to buy a house.
You don't have time to save, if we tried to save for a downpayment on a decent house we wouldn't have it until the kids are moved out.
What don't you get.
This ain't detroit a house costs at least 1.5 million.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's funny that people think that those making 300K or more are just lazying around.
We are constantly working and because of that we have other expensese that need to be paid because we don't have time to do them.
1) Lawn care
2) Nanny
3) Childcare
4) Cleaning
etc...
Once you add all of those things up the lifestyle at 300k is not that comfortable. Maybe once we get into the 5-600k you start experience more disposable income, but at 300k you have to pay for a bunch of stuff you have to outsource.
On top of that around 300k you lose a lot of tax deductions so you are basically in limbo in terms of wreeping the benefits of making more. The tax benefits you lose at 3-400k are the same ones that you lose at 500k and higher.
What is this "wreeping"?
![]()
We make $290,000 and don't have any of those services. Our lawn looks kind of crappy and our house is kind of messy but we choose to spend money on other things. Yes, we do spend free time cleaning and weeding but we don't complain about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's funny that people think that those making 300K or more are just lazying around.
We are constantly working and because of that we have other expensese that need to be paid because we don't have time to do them.
1) Lawn care
2) Nanny
3) Childcare
4) Cleaning
etc...
Once you add all of those things up the lifestyle at 300k is not that comfortable. Maybe once we get into the 5-600k you start experience more disposable income, but at 300k you have to pay for a bunch of stuff you have to outsource.
On top of that around 300k you lose a lot of tax deductions so you are basically in limbo in terms of wreeping the benefits of making more. The tax benefits you lose at 3-400k are the same ones that you lose at 500k and higher.
What is this "wreeping"?
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's funny that people think that those making 300K or more are just lazying around.
We are constantly working and because of that we have other expensese that need to be paid because we don't have time to do them.
1) Lawn care
2) Nanny
3) Childcare
4) Cleaning
etc...
Once you add all of those things up the lifestyle at 300k is not that comfortable. Maybe once we get into the 5-600k you start experience more disposable income, but at 300k you have to pay for a bunch of stuff you have to outsource.
On top of that around 300k you lose a lot of tax deductions so you are basically in limbo in terms of wreeping the benefits of making more. The tax benefits you lose at 3-400k are the same ones that you lose at 500k and higher.
What is this "wreeping"?
Anonymous wrote:It's funny that people think that those making 300K or more are just lazying around.
We are constantly working and because of that we have other expensese that need to be paid because we don't have time to do them.
1) Lawn care
2) Nanny
3) Childcare
4) Cleaning
etc...
Once you add all of those things up the lifestyle at 300k is not that comfortable. Maybe once we get into the 5-600k you start experience more disposable income, but at 300k you have to pay for a bunch of stuff you have to outsource.
On top of that around 300k you lose a lot of tax deductions so you are basically in limbo in terms of wreeping the benefits of making more. The tax benefits you lose at 3-400k are the same ones that you lose at 500k and higher.
Anonymous wrote:After taxes (Fed and District), private school for 1 and second coming from local DCPS into private, saving for college, retirement, long term care, helping out family members etc. You feel really squeezed. Our brother inlaw in Houston get to take 3 or 4 vacations a year on about $300k a year, we can only take one real one and then have to huff it to Delaware for the weekend. It kind of is a rat race and we're stuck in this income zone for the foreseeable future (thanks biglaw profit slips).
Anonymous wrote:I can only conclude that "feeling wealthy" means "not ever having to think about money ever." So if you ever even have to check the balance on your accounts or can't afford the too of the market, you don't "feel wealthy." There seems to be no way to "feel wealthy" unless you are as rich as the richest person around.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, you are now realizing that the cake is a lie. Partnership at a big law firm does not mean that you get to have a great life, though it may mean you children do.
You find out too late. You think that after DH makes partner he'll work 50 hour weeks but it's still 80 plus hours, coupled with the fact that you can't just spend that extra money and you really start to resent the system.