Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

You're very uptight, aren't you? You might need to get laid.

Why do you care? If you don't want to have that much sex with that many people, then don't. If you don't want to sleep with someone who has had sex with that many people, then don't.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I'm 27 and my number is well over 100. I'm female by the way. I love sex and I get bored pretty quickly in bed.

My vagina is large, it contains multitudes...

False stereotype. What about women that have sex with the same partner say at least once a day. No one says their vag is large.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can't get butthurt if you're calling people "ho" and they respond by calling you unfuckable or a dickless wonder. Seriously. You get what you put out there.

I'm not butthurt at all. I am amused that you obviously think that is a crushing response. In fact it is a lame and ineffectual insult that reveals how limited and predictable your mind is.

I really couldn't care less that she's a skanky old ho who lets countless men pump and dump her. Why are you all butthurt about me calling it as I see it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You can't get butthurt if you're calling people "ho" and they respond by calling you unfuckable or a dickless wonder. Seriously. You get what you put out there.

I'm not butthurt at all. I am amused that you obviously think that is a crushing response. In fact it is a lame and ineffectual insult that reveals how limited and predictable your mind is.

I really couldn't care less that she's a skanky old ho who lets countless men pump and dump her. Why are you all butthurt about me calling it as I see it?

Anonymous wrote:You can't get butthurt if you're calling people "ho" and they respond by calling you unfuckable or a dickless wonder. Seriously. You get what you put out there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

LOL, are you trying to say she may have had 2 penises inside her vagina at the same time?

Most likely they went into different holes, but yeah it is possible to get two in one hole. And she sounds like just the person who could do that!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

You're very uptight, aren't you? You might need to get laid.

Why do you care? If you don't want to have that much sex with that many people, then don't. If you don't want to sleep with someone who has had sex with that many people, then don't.

I don't need you to tell me to do as I like. And one of the things I like to do is call a ho a ho -- and in this case, that is just the right term.

You sound like one of the uptight frat boys that I wouldn't fuck in college. They were always pissed that I wouldn't do them. They were universally bad in bed. Not worth the time it takes to remove their pants.

So why are you so uptight and judgmental about what people say in this forum?

Do you actually think that your ludicrous blather about imaginary frat boys is an effective form of argumentation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

LOL, are you trying to say she may have had 2 penises inside her vagina at the same time?

Most likely they went into different holes, but yeah it is possible to get two in one hole. And she sounds like just the person who could do that!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

You're very uptight, aren't you? You might need to get laid.

Why do you care? If you don't want to have that much sex with that many people, then don't. If you don't want to sleep with someone who has had sex with that many people, then don't.

I don't need you to tell me to do as I like. And one of the things I like to do is call a ho a ho -- and in this case, that is just the right term.

You sound like one of the uptight frat boys that I wouldn't fuck in college. They were always pissed that I wouldn't do them. They were universally bad in bed. Not worth the time it takes to remove their pants.

So why are you so uptight and judgmental about what people say in this forum?

Do you actually think that your ludicrous blather about imaginary frat boys is an effective form of argumentation?

Frat boys are real. They aren't like unicorns. I've met more than a few. If you went to college, you might have met them, too.

Look. Here's a good photo of a confirmed sighting.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

LOL, are you trying to say she may have had 2 penises inside her vagina at the same time?

Most likely they went into different holes, but yeah it is possible to get two in one hole. And she sounds like just the person who could do that!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

You're very uptight, aren't you? You might need to get laid.

Why do you care? If you don't want to have that much sex with that many people, then don't. If you don't want to sleep with someone who has had sex with that many people, then don't.

I don't need you to tell me to do as I like. And one of the things I like to do is call a ho a ho -- and in this case, that is just the right term.

You sound like one of the uptight frat boys that I wouldn't fuck in college. They were always pissed that I wouldn't do them. They were universally bad in bed. Not worth the time it takes to remove their pants.

So why are you so uptight and judgmental about what people say in this forum?

Do you actually think that your ludicrous blather about imaginary frat boys is an effective form of argumentation?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

LOL, are you trying to say she may have had 2 penises inside her vagina at the same time?

Most likely they went into different holes, but yeah it is possible to get two in one hole. And she sounds like just the person who could do that!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

You're very uptight, aren't you? You might need to get laid.

Why do you care? If you don't want to have that much sex with that many people, then don't. If you don't want to sleep with someone who has had sex with that many people, then don't.

I don't need you to tell me to do as I like. And one of the things I like to do is call a ho a ho -- and in this case, that is just the right term.

You sound like one of the uptight frat boys that I wouldn't fuck in college. They were always pissed that I wouldn't do them. They were universally bad in bed. Not worth the time it takes to remove their pants.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went through my wild, crazy, single, don't want to be tied down days...but some of these numbers are just mind boggling to me. Do you never see the same man twice? You think that's sexy? Really?

Sexy to who? Sexy to me? or sexy for future partners? Obviously, if I'm doing it, it's because I want to do it. My husband of 21 years doesn't have an issue with numbers, so it's obviously not a detriment to my long term numbers.

I'm not at 100, but 100 is not that high. If you are sexually active from age 18 to 28 and have one anonymous hook-up per month, you will end up with 120 partners over that period. That's one frat party or bar night a month.

You will also end up with an STD, in all likelihood, whether you are male or female!

Your risk of most STDs, except HPV, is pretty low if you are sleeping with people who are college educated and if you use condoms. STDs are caused by viruses and bacteria, not the number of miles you put on your vagina.

Exposure to HPV is pretty much universal, regardless of number of partners, unless you and your partner are virgins.

Thanks for playing, though.

I disagree with you, based on my professional background, which has included a good amount of health risk behavior research. But whatever you say. But gee, I wish I had your wit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I went through my wild, crazy, single, don't want to be tied down days...but some of these numbers are just mind boggling to me. Do you never see the same man twice? You think that's sexy? Really?

Sexy to who? Sexy to me? or sexy for future partners? Obviously, if I'm doing it, it's because I want to do it. My husband of 21 years doesn't have an issue with numbers, so it's obviously not a detriment to my long term numbers.

I'm not at 100, but 100 is not that high. If you are sexually active from age 18 to 28 and have one anonymous hook-up per month, you will end up with 120 partners over that period. That's one frat party or bar night a month.

You will also end up with an STD, in all likelihood, whether you are male or female!

Your risk of most STDs, except HPV, is pretty low if you are sleeping with people who are college educated and if you use condoms. STDs are caused by viruses and bacteria, not the number of miles you put on your vagina.

Exposure to HPV is pretty much universal, regardless of number of partners, unless you and your partner are virgins.

Thanks for playing, though.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Less than Madonna, more than Princess Di...

Tactful response.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

LOL, are you trying to say she may have had 2 penises inside her vagina at the same time?

Most likely they went into different holes, but yeah it is possible to get two in one hole. And she sounds like just the person who could do that!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:One guy at a time is hardly a "multitude."

A skanky old ho who has had over 100 men inside her might have had them one at a time... but I certainly wouldn't bet any money that she'd never taken them two (or more) at a time.

You're very uptight, aren't you? You might need to get laid.

Why do you care? If you don't want to have that much sex with that many people, then don't. If you don't want to sleep with someone who has had sex with that many people, then don't.

I don't need you to tell me to do as I like. And one of the things I like to do is call a ho a ho -- and in this case, that is just the right term.

You sound like one of the uptight frat boys that I wouldn't fuck in college. They were always pissed that I wouldn't do them. They were universally bad in bed. Not worth the time it takes to remove their pants.