Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some posters here and many parents really do not understand what immersion is all about - since they seem to think it's no big deal to send a kid with no language experience into a school where his peers would have been participating in an immersion program for years.
I think some seriously think, "oh, no big deal, so they have a Mandarin class - maybe little Johnny can skip that and take something else - or if he does have to take it but isn't good at Mandarin, maybe he'll get a D in that class but everything else will be OK." Immersion means it's not just one language class. It means it will be coming up all throughout the schoolday. It will show up in History class. Science class. And so on. Further, language is a lifelong learning journey. You don't master Mandarin in a semester. A student coming in as a newbie to a room full of peers who have been working on it for years will flounder.
He'll be like that kid drowning in the deep end of the pool above. That parent will be doing their child a huge disservice if they don't understand that.
And I think people such as yourself hear things no one is saying. Who in this thread is minimizing or dismissing the work it takes to help a student who doesn't start at the entry grade get up to speed in proficiency? Quote please.
How would you propose that student catch up on several years worth of proficiency?
I think people are describing the rules that YY operates on, which include not admitting new students after 2nd grade.
I'm fine with those rules. Other posters seem insistent on being able to send kids after 2nd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some posters here and many parents really do not understand what immersion is all about - since they seem to think it's no big deal to send a kid with no language experience into a school where his peers would have been participating in an immersion program for years.
I think some seriously think, "oh, no big deal, so they have a Mandarin class - maybe little Johnny can skip that and take something else - or if he does have to take it but isn't good at Mandarin, maybe he'll get a D in that class but everything else will be OK." Immersion means it's not just one language class. It means it will be coming up all throughout the schoolday. It will show up in History class. Science class. And so on. Further, language is a lifelong learning journey. You don't master Mandarin in a semester. A student coming in as a newbie to a room full of peers who have been working on it for years will flounder.
He'll be like that kid drowning in the deep end of the pool above. That parent will be doing their child a huge disservice if they don't understand that.
And I think people such as yourself hear things no one is saying. Who in this thread is minimizing or dismissing the work it takes to help a student who doesn't start at the entry grade get up to speed in proficiency? Quote please.
How would you propose that student catch up on several years worth of proficiency?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having kids come into a specialized program like that at later grades is a logistical and educational nightmare.
It is not a logistical and educational nightmare if the students read, write and speak the language on a level equal to or above currently enrolled students.
That would dictate test-in admissions, but test-in is politically opposed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Having kids come into a specialized program like that at later grades is a logistical and educational nightmare.
It is not a logistical and educational nightmare if the students read, write and speak the language on a level equal to or above currently enrolled students.
Anonymous wrote:Having kids come into a specialized program like that at later grades is a logistical and educational nightmare.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some posters here and many parents really do not understand what immersion is all about - since they seem to think it's no big deal to send a kid with no language experience into a school where his peers would have been participating in an immersion program for years.
I think some seriously think, "oh, no big deal, so they have a Mandarin class - maybe little Johnny can skip that and take something else - or if he does have to take it but isn't good at Mandarin, maybe he'll get a D in that class but everything else will be OK." Immersion means it's not just one language class. It means it will be coming up all throughout the schoolday. It will show up in History class. Science class. And so on. Further, language is a lifelong learning journey. You don't master Mandarin in a semester. A student coming in as a newbie to a room full of peers who have been working on it for years will flounder.
He'll be like that kid drowning in the deep end of the pool above. That parent will be doing their child a huge disservice if they don't understand that.
And I think people such as yourself hear things no one is saying. Who in this thread is minimizing or dismissing the work it takes to help a student who doesn't start at the entry grade get up to speed in proficiency? Quote please.
How would you propose that student catch up on several years worth of proficiency?
I think people are describing the rules that YY operates on, which include not admitting new students after 2nd grade.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some posters here and many parents really do not understand what immersion is all about - since they seem to think it's no big deal to send a kid with no language experience into a school where his peers would have been participating in an immersion program for years.
I think some seriously think, "oh, no big deal, so they have a Mandarin class - maybe little Johnny can skip that and take something else - or if he does have to take it but isn't good at Mandarin, maybe he'll get a D in that class but everything else will be OK." Immersion means it's not just one language class. It means it will be coming up all throughout the schoolday. It will show up in History class. Science class. And so on. Further, language is a lifelong learning journey. You don't master Mandarin in a semester. A student coming in as a newbie to a room full of peers who have been working on it for years will flounder.
He'll be like that kid drowning in the deep end of the pool above. That parent will be doing their child a huge disservice if they don't understand that.
And I think people such as yourself hear things no one is saying. Who in this thread is minimizing or dismissing the work it takes to help a student who doesn't start at the entry grade get up to speed in proficiency? Quote please.
How would you propose that student catch up on several years worth of proficiency?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some posters here and many parents really do not understand what immersion is all about - since they seem to think it's no big deal to send a kid with no language experience into a school where his peers would have been participating in an immersion program for years.
I think some seriously think, "oh, no big deal, so they have a Mandarin class - maybe little Johnny can skip that and take something else - or if he does have to take it but isn't good at Mandarin, maybe he'll get a D in that class but everything else will be OK." Immersion means it's not just one language class. It means it will be coming up all throughout the schoolday. It will show up in History class. Science class. And so on. Further, language is a lifelong learning journey. You don't master Mandarin in a semester. A student coming in as a newbie to a room full of peers who have been working on it for years will flounder.
He'll be like that kid drowning in the deep end of the pool above. That parent will be doing their child a huge disservice if they don't understand that.
And I think people such as yourself hear things no one is saying. Who in this thread is minimizing or dismissing the work it takes to help a student who doesn't start at the entry grade get up to speed in proficiency? Quote please.
How would you propose that student catch up on several years worth of proficiency?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think some posters here and many parents really do not understand what immersion is all about - since they seem to think it's no big deal to send a kid with no language experience into a school where his peers would have been participating in an immersion program for years.
I think some seriously think, "oh, no big deal, so they have a Mandarin class - maybe little Johnny can skip that and take something else - or if he does have to take it but isn't good at Mandarin, maybe he'll get a D in that class but everything else will be OK." Immersion means it's not just one language class. It means it will be coming up all throughout the schoolday. It will show up in History class. Science class. And so on. Further, language is a lifelong learning journey. You don't master Mandarin in a semester. A student coming in as a newbie to a room full of peers who have been working on it for years will flounder.
He'll be like that kid drowning in the deep end of the pool above. That parent will be doing their child a huge disservice if they don't understand that.
And I think people such as yourself hear things no one is saying. Who in this thread is minimizing or dismissing the work it takes to help a student who doesn't start at the entry grade get up to speed in proficiency? Quote please.
Anonymous wrote:The only fair way to use the resources of a school like Yu Ying is to have a lottery for every seat every year. Why should children get to have a whole six years of Chinese immersion just because they got lucky in the lottery once? Every student should have an equal chance to have immersion every year.
As a matter of fact, why should any student have a "right" to a seat at the same school they went to the year before? All charter and DCPS school seats should be assigned by lottery every year. That's the only way to treat all students equally.
What's that you say? All those lotteries and transferring would be a big burden on families? That it would undermine the whole point of immersion if you could only do it for one year? Are you saying those concerns outweigh the need for complete equality of access to every seat at every grade level?
Well then. We agree that complete fairness and equal access to a given school has to give way to other concerns. So all we are arguing about is which concerns are important enough.
One side of this thread thinks that at the point where complete fairness means that a seat has to go vacant--because a lottery would most likely pick a student who is not equipped to enter a mandarin immersion classroom at a third-grade level--it is better to allow the seat to be filled by someone who is equipped than to let it stay vacant.
The other side thinks that it is better to let the seat go vacant.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hi Op, I only read a few pages of this thread (did not have time to read it entirely) and had to write to apologize for all of the very rude people who responded!
My child is in an immersion program and you can bet that if I had to relocate, I would try my hardest to get him into another immersion school! I personally do not understand why you cannot test an enter into a higher grade (provided you got in via lottery) - this seems very unfair. I imagine that if a YY parent had to move to another state they would also try to do the same.
I just want to say that you are certainly not asking anything unreasonable and I wish you luck in your search! Please come back to update us!
As a Yu Ying parent getting ready to move to another state, we are doing everything in our power to get into another immersion charter. I've yet to find one that doesn't allow test in. Clearly, the entire country must be against poor children. Honestly, the argument that rich kids with tutors will take over these schools if they can test in is preposterous. We are a bilingual household and I can't tell you how long it takes children to proficiently speak in both languages (not just understand). If one of those languages is English, it can take even longer. Not allowing testing at higher grades just discourages native speakers. I'm starting to wonder if most on this thread are okay with discriminating against Chinese, not just African Americans.
1. Liar. How many states are you attempting to move into, exactly?
2. You didn't look very hard throughout "the entire country" for such a school that doesn't permit test-in in higher grades so as to bypass the lottery process. I found three in three minutes. Check out yinghua acsmdemy in Minneapolis as one of these examples. Lottery. Period.