Anonymous wrote:21:12. Yes, but not as many compared to other areas of the country that have lower class sizes and still give raises.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of people want to cut the AAP programs.
How does that help save the money? Those AAP students would still need to go somewhere. It's not like they're gonna disappear.
Are these people jealous?
Geez get over it would ya.
Are you the stupid SAHM whose kids couldn't get into the AAP programs? I feel your pain.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:A lot of people want to cut the AAP programs.
How does that help save the money? Those AAP students would still need to go somewhere. It's not like they're gonna disappear.
Are these people jealous?
Geez get over it would ya.
Anonymous wrote:A lot of people want to cut the AAP programs.
How does that help save the money? Those AAP students would still need to go somewhere. It's not like they're gonna disappear.
Are these people jealous?
Why in one of the most affluent areas of the country can't we give our teachers raises, pay for special education, keep our buildings maintained and keep class sizes reasonable. It just doesn't make any sense.
A lot of people want to cut the AAP programs.
How does that help save the money? Those AAP students would still need to go somewhere. It's not like they're gonna disappear.
Are these people jealous?
Anonymous wrote:Agree with 13:31 except Assistant Principals. Even the report said this could be cut. Many schools have more than 1. Cut instructional, math, and reading coaches as much as possible too.
Anonymous wrote:Agree with 13:31 except Assistant Principals. Even the report said this could be cut. Many schools have more than 1. Cut instructional, math, and reading coaches as much as possible too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep high school sports. Charge athletic fee and have a sliding scale for those who cannot afford it.
People pay to attend the games. Coaches are paid next to nothing.
No sliding scale, sports aren't a need it's an extra