Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bump! Why are things so mum about Stokes? Someone, anyone please post their enrollment deadlines.
Your response is not helpful. People should do a lot of things instead of posting on here. I'm too nervous to do it. That's why I'm asking someone on here. If that's not you, please ignore the post. It's so early to have to battle douches on here!
Why in the world are you afraid to call the school? And you do realize that not everything posted on DCUM is accurate, right? So you could keep bumping the thread and begging for answers and get the wrong info.
If you're that anxious, your time is best spent working on the best Plan B you can for your Hilda. Sad truth is, no amount of stressing on DCUM will improve your chances at Stokes, and because the top of the Stokes wait lists are full of parents who were lucky and motivated, unless you're in the top 5 you probably need to work your Plan B anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bump! Why are things so mum about Stokes? Someone, anyone please post their enrollment deadlines.
Your response is not helpful. People should do a lot of things instead of posting on here. I'm too nervous to do it. That's why I'm asking someone on here. If that's not you, please ignore the post. It's so early to have to battle douches on here!
Why in the world are you afraid to call the school? And you do realize that not everything posted on DCUM is accurate, right? So you could keep bumping the thread and begging for answers and get the wrong info.
If you're that anxious, your time is best spent working on the best Plan B you can for your Hilda. Sad truth is, no amount of stressing on DCUM will improve your chances at Stokes, and because the top of the Stokes wait lists are full of parents who were lucky and motivated, unless you're in the top 5 you probably need to work your Plan B anyway.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bump! Why are things so mum about Stokes? Someone, anyone please post their enrollment deadlines.
Your response is not helpful. People should do a lot of things instead of posting on here. I'm too nervous to do it. That's why I'm asking someone on here. If that's not you, please ignore the post. It's so early to have to battle douches on here!
Anonymous wrote:Bump! Why are things so mum about Stokes? Someone, anyone please post their enrollment deadlines.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I called the school and they said the "timestamp" did matter. They're investigating what happened right now. Also, some other posts said they might have received "batches" of applications that screwed up the timestamps. According to the school, that didn't happen. They know exactly when, in order, who submitted when. I feel sorry for your clients "technical grant staff person", but with a title like that, which you gave yourself, you're better called "pea brain grant wannabe"!
They are "investigating" and "looking into it" and they "take the matter very seriously" right?
I'm sure.
I love people like you. You just sit back and wait for that call.
Anonymous wrote:I called the school and they said the "timestamp" did matter. They're investigating what happened right now. Also, some other posts said they might have received "batches" of applications that screwed up the timestamps. According to the school, that didn't happen. They know exactly when, in order, who submitted when. I feel sorry for your clients "technical grant staff person", but with a title like that, which you gave yourself, you're better called "pea brain grant wannabe"!
Anonymous wrote:I called the school and they said the "timestamp" did matter. They're investigating what happened right now. Also, some other posts said they might have received "batches" of applications that screwed up the timestamps. According to the school, that didn't happen. They know exactly when, in order, who submitted when. I feel sorry for your clients "technical grant staff person", but with a title like that, which you gave yourself, you're better called "pea brain grant wannabe"!