Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:RE: LAMB, when we applied last year there was a place on the application to indicate whether Spanish was spoken at home (don't remember the exact wording).
I rest my case. LAMB has been told to stop asking that question for separate lotteries, but they have no fear of repercussions. I think I will tell my sister to use my DC address and apply for my niece who resides in Maryland. She's 18 months and live in downtown Silver Spring. If she gets a spot, my sister can drop her off on her way to work. Easy commute
Yeah, what's the chance they're still being sneaky about it? My native Spanish speaking caucasian DC and I were ignored at the charter expo while obvious Latinos were "courted" by LAMBS reps.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:RE: LAMB, when we applied last year there was a place on the application to indicate whether Spanish was spoken at home (don't remember the exact wording).
I rest my case. LAMB has been told to stop asking that question for separate lotteries, but they have no fear of repercussions. I think I will tell my sister to use my DC address and apply for my niece who resides in Maryland. She's 18 months and live in downtown Silver Spring. If she gets a spot, my sister can drop her off on her way to work. Easy commute
Anonymous wrote:RE: LAMB, when we applied last year there was a place on the application to indicate whether Spanish was spoken at home (don't remember the exact wording).
Anonymous wrote:I do not have firsthand knowledge, but piecing together from this thread and what I've read elsewhere on DCUM, it sounds like their charter was threatened recently when the many stories of this dual lottery were not going away, and they reluctantly now are clear that they only have one lottery and do not give language preference (which is the part that is against the charters). If they are still cheating, I'd guess they are risking their charter, but that is basically just a guess given what I've read here and heard elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Does someone have firsthand knowledge of Lamb's cheating w/ two lotteries? The school adamantly denies it.
Anonymous wrote:Disgusting and cheating are a narrow-minded YY take. Lamb administrators and parents have shown a willingness to buck a bad system to draw in the native speakers they need to serve their students and community well. The parents aren't complaining, so why are you? You're sure that few native speakers means the greater good is served?
More power to 'em for their cheatin' ways.
Anonymous wrote:I'll clarify, sorry if it was confusing:
2011-2012- did not get in suspected (aware of) wait list fraud
2012-2013 school year applied and got in, excited (even though we knew of fraud last year) because we can not afford to go to private school, our IB school is not very good, and we can not afford to move. We were desperate to give our child the best education possible and a that point had not won a spot anywhere else.
And yes, we eventually got in Mundo Verde and decided to go there because the over feel was much warmer and inviting, which has proven to be a great fit for my child and my family.
I can not say if YY is a good school or not, it think that is subjective to your situation and expectations.
MV, in my opinion is a great place for my family. I am happy with my child's progress in reading, writing, math, awareness of the world around us, the importance on community, the "green" focus, the emotional support given to the children, the wonderful art and movement classes, the language aspect, I could go on and on
Anonymous wrote:Disgusting and cheating are a narrow-minded YY take. Lamb administrators and parents have shown a willingness to buck a bad system to draw in the native speakers they need to serve their students and community well. The parents aren't complaining, so why are you? You're sure that few native speakers means the greater good is served?
More power to 'em for their cheatin' ways.