There are nice, quality bags for $100-$200. Hopefully the one you buy will be closer to $150 than $1K.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your cheap 3K bags are pathetic. Now this is a nice bag:
http://www.madisonavenuecouture.com/Hermes-Handbag-Hermes-Bicolor-Kelly-PHW-35cm-p/hh-051612-11-2.htm?gclid=CKLKheyNprICFUJo4Aod9lYANg&click=482&utm_source=googlebase&utm_medium=shoppingengine
Hermes Kelly. It comes with its own rainhat and "has never been carried". 8)
Anonymous wrote:Your cheap 3K bags are pathetic. Now this is a nice bag:
http://www.madisonavenuecouture.com/Hermes-Handbag-Hermes-Bicolor-Kelly-PHW-35cm-p/hh-051612-11-2.htm?gclid=CKLKheyNprICFUJo4Aod9lYANg&click=482&utm_source=googlebase&utm_medium=shoppingengine
Anonymous wrote:Oh my.
OP here. Holy crap. What is wrong with you people?
I haven't had time to check DCUM in a while so I was excited to check back and see if anyone found me a great bag ..... And needless to say I was surprised to see 11 pages of fighting about whether rich people hang picassos in the bathroom and other such fascinating topics.
Anyways, thanks for the suggestions I did get - I liked Rebecca minkoff and kooba too!
(And, FWIW, I not feel the slightest bit bad about buying myself a nice bag for my 40th bday, and no amount of DCUM vitriol will change that. I rarely treat myself to such things, I can easily afford it, and I deserve it!)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one keeps Rembrandts - or Picassos, or any kind of valuable art - in their bathroom, regardless of how rich they are. Real art collectors would never do that to a painting.
I was thinking the exact same thing! Wouldn't the steam from the shower essentially ruin them? Doesn't truly fine art require special handling (temperatures, lighting, etc.)? No one who would care that much about preserving such fine works of art to pass down through the ages would treat those pieces like this. I call BS on the idiotic poster who claimes she knows so many of these people.
You're the idiot. I mentioned later in the thread that the painting was in a powder room. No shower steam in a powder room. Believe what you want to -- doesn't matter to me.
Then you should have said that up front, since I didn't see your clarification until AFTER I sub,itted my post. That doesn't change the fact that putting such a fine piece of art in such a room is just plain idiotic and asking for it to be ruined.
I did that because, like other posters you've been arguing with more than me, I don't believe you actually know these people. You brought it on yourself with your high and mighty, holier than thou attitude. Next time keep that in check if you don't want people like me to give you a hard time.
Ok, but you didn't have to call me an "idiotic poster" just because I knew someone who kept fine art in the powder room. It's not my fault.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one keeps Rembrandts - or Picassos, or any kind of valuable art - in their bathroom, regardless of how rich they are. Real art collectors would never do that to a painting.
I was thinking the exact same thing! Wouldn't the steam from the shower essentially ruin them? Doesn't truly fine art require special handling (temperatures, lighting, etc.)? No one who would care that much about preserving such fine works of art to pass down through the ages would treat those pieces like this. I call BS on the idiotic poster who claimes she knows so many of these people.
You're the idiot. I mentioned later in the thread that the painting was in a powder room. No shower steam in a powder room. Believe what you want to -- doesn't matter to me.
Then you should have said that up front, since I didn't see your clarification until AFTER I sub,itted my post. That doesn't change the fact that putting such a fine piece of art in such a room is just plain idiotic and asking for it to be ruined.
Anonymous wrote:Why is it in bad taste? Some people live in big houses while others live in small ones either by choice or necessity. For that matter, some have no homes at all. I guess it is in poor taste to buy a home at all. Your logic is flawed and reeks of jealousy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one keeps Rembrandts - or Picassos, or any kind of valuable art - in their bathroom, regardless of how rich they are. Real art collectors would never do that to a painting.
I was thinking the exact same thing! Wouldn't the steam from the shower essentially ruin them? Doesn't truly fine art require special handling (temperatures, lighting, etc.)? No one who would care that much about preserving such fine works of art to pass down through the ages would treat those pieces like this. I call BS on the idiotic poster who claimes she knows so many of these people.
You're the idiot. I mentioned later in the thread that the painting was in a powder room. No shower steam in a powder room. Believe what you want to -- doesn't matter to me.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one keeps Rembrandts - or Picassos, or any kind of valuable art - in their bathroom, regardless of how rich they are. Real art collectors would never do that to a painting.
I was thinking the exact same thing! Wouldn't the steam from the shower essentially ruin them? Doesn't truly fine art require special handling (temperatures, lighting, etc.)? No one who would care that much about preserving such fine works of art to pass down through the ages would treat those pieces like this. I call BS on the idiotic poster who claimes she knows so many of these people.