Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I wasn't actually surprised by the parochial content of the threads. Most of the YY parents I rub shoulders with hardly seem to know a thing about China or the culture, not where the major cities and provinces are located, not the major dialects, nor the major holidays, nor do they seem to care... This is the group posied to help launch the wonderfully international, much in demand and outward-looking DCI.
So are you a YY parent? If you have so many issues with the school, you should go elsewhere... and not send your DC to DCI. Easy decision. Hope you find a school that will serves your family's needs b/c YY and the future DCI won't for all the reasons you mentioned.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:12:47, you really think this trip is "once in a lifetime?"
Isn't the purpose of sending your child to a Mandarin immersion program so they could live and work in China someday?
I expect my child will go to China someday, but I don't appreciate being told with whom and when.
I'm not 12:47, but you're kidding, right? How is a class trip in 5th grade not a "once in a lifetime" opportunity?
My junior year of high school I came on a Close-Up trip to Washington, DC for a week. It had a tremendous impact on me, so much so that 20 years later I moved here, and now I can visit the all the important spots anytime I want.
Guess what? That 1-week trip during my impressionable years was a defining once-a-lifetime opportunity. I find it easy to believe that a trip to China (or Belize, or Moscow, or Amsterdam...) would have a profound impact on a young person's life, their interest in studying another language, their perspective on other cultures, and even on their ultimate choice in a career.
If you're so sure you're taking your child to China some day, that's wonderful. Your child might be lucky despite having you as a parent. In the meantime, what is wrong with you that you object to the idea of a group of students raising the money to go to China - Oh! Oh my! - even if they didn't ask your permission?
Anonymous wrote:
I wasn't actually surprised by the parochial content of the threads. Most of the YY parents I rub shoulders with hardly seem to know a thing about China or the culture, not where the major cities and provinces are located, not the major dialects, nor the major holidays, nor do they seem to care... This is the group posied to help launch the wonderfully international, much in demand and outward-looking DCI.
Anonymous wrote:
Philadelphia--I was at the top of my class (#2) and was waitlisted at Columbia and accepted at U of Penn; the number #1 kid went to Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:"This is nonsense. Yu Ying already practices ability grouping as well as tier two tracking. DCI is an extension of YY, with other immersion schools thrown in the mix for sustainability. I don't know which of the immersion schools will control DCI, but I guarantee that because the majority of the space has been designated to YY, YY will have much influence. So enough about the doomsday gloomy inability to group children's academic ability. It's already happening."
It is happening, but the two-tier (AA-white/Asian) tracking at YY has generated painfully bad press for the school, and been highly controversial, hasn't it? It's not a comfortable subject. YY is not short on high-SES parents who'd rather see the school do what suburban immersion schools do, take fewer low-SES kids but ensure that those enrolled can and do thrive by the providing necessary inputs, however expensive (e.g. funded immersion summer camps). I'm one of the few YY parents convinced that low-SES kids would benefit from having many more bilingual peers to model the language and culture for them, particularly low-SES Chinese-speakers. My kid often has play dates with one of the few bilingual kids (from a high-SES family) and improves his Mandarin and cultural understanding by spending time with this child's family. It's not "academic ability" that underpins the two tiers, it's race, class and poor planning.
I don't see DCI on a smooth path to extensive ability grouping because YY is already doing some. The gap between the low-SES and high-SES kids will grow at the MS level, adding to the controversy. Too many of the high-SES families don't seem sold on the DCI concept, or city middle schools in general, which concerns me - they're quietly preparing their kids to take admissions tests for privates, or considering moving. The problems Latin and Two Rivers have faced in keeping white and Asian kids for HS are not lost on this crowd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So, interviewers, what DOES it take to get into one of the higly selective colleges from a DC public school?
Little Ivy Interviewer here. Here's what I've seen other applicants do that DCPS and Latin kids generally don't:
*Score 700s on all three sections of the SAT if high-SES, and at least mid 600s if low-SES/FARMs. Take the SAT multiple times if necessary. Making the 700 cuts only means that an application is read - Ivies/Little Ivies now reject around 3/4 of the kids with at least one perfect SAT score. A kid's chances of admission rise from around 10% to 15% if they score in the 750-800 range on a section rather than in the 700-750 range. Banneker's average SAT scores are in the 480-520 range. Don't know what Latin's are, but not 700s.
*Pick a favorite school and apply Early Action/Decision in October, even if binding. Chances of admission double by applying early.
*If language immersion in ES, have immersion experiences in MS and HS during summers/breaks. Low-SES kids can apply for foundation grants to participate in immersion camps, domestically and abroad. MoCo and Fairfax fund such camps for low-SES kids, DC isn't doing this. If high-SES with enough space in the home, hire a series of part-time au pairs speaking the immersion language, possible through the State Dept. program to age 12, if at least one of the parents isn't fluent in it.
*Participate in the Johns Hopkins CTY camps (nearest at campus of St. Stephens and St. Agnes in VA), preferably from the summer after 2nd grade through MS. The MS camps are sleep-over camps. Hopkins waives the $2,500 - $4,000 fee for FARMs kids. Participate in the Stanford University EPSY on-line programs for gifted youth, particularly for math and science. MS kids can also do Kumon, Saxon and Khan Academy math on-line.
*Take algebra no later than the 7th grade, even if humanities oriented. If a DC PS doesn't offer it before 8th grade, takes it during the summer at a Johns Hopkins camp or via Stanford EPSY.
*If the school offers IB, pursue the full diploma and score 40+ (schools can revoke admissions offers for a low total score). Even if a school offers IB, take AP language exams (no longer any need to take AP courses to take exams) or SAT II language exams and get 700s+ (or retake). Do this because IB test scores don't come out until after HS graduation, which can handicap IB kids. If a school does not offer IB, take at least 7 AP tests, preferably 10. Score all 4s and 5s, even if low-SES. Retake any tests where the score is a 3 or lower. If a humanities student, take 2 IB and AP language tests, or just 2 AP.
*Pursue unusual extra-curriculars and summer activities, preferably one of a kind involving travel/volunteering.
*If science-oriented, enter at least one of the national science or team robotics competitions with a mentor from 10th grade, or the NIH high school research program. Do not stop at AB calculus and physics (one year), take the second year/level, BC, through self-study if necessary.
Not every applicant does all this of course, but I've never seen one fail who did and I've interviewed around 80. One caveat: the "rules" for top HS athletes, actors and musicians are different. Hope this helps.
Wow, I got into an Ivy 15 years ago for undergrad (humanities/social sciences) and I didn't do the majority of your list--just good SAT score, grades, school leadership and volunteering. And I attended a standard/average parochial school for MS/HS. What happened??!!
Not PP. Which part of the country did you apply? It makes a difference if you are from NYC/Westchester, Bethesda/CC/DC, Boston, etc. and the rest of the country. It's tough and highly competitive to get in from these areas and while it's gotten somewhat worse since the 80ties when I went, the kids who get into the Ivies then and now are the very top. THAT hasn't changed at all. I went to an Ivy and met a lot of other kids from most of the elite schools doing debate and invariably if they were from DC, it was from Bethesda/CC; Chicago, New Trier; NYC, Hunter, Stuy, etc. I'm sure that hasn't changed much.
That said, we're willing to see how DCI will work out. Certainly, a good middle school option is welcome. While I am a fan of ability tracking and testing for admissions in high school, middle school not so much. Like PP said, as long as they have algebra in 7th grade and geometry by 8th - it'll be enough.
Anonymous wrote:"Yu Ying already practices ability grouping as well as tier two tracking."
Um, YY parent here.
There is a track for kids who can't read in English.
The notion that there is true tracking by ability at YY is not true. Bored doesn't even begin to sum up my child's experience at YY. At least it's only every other day and DC finds Chinese enjoyable.
The notion that YY leadership has the ability to create a competitive high school is laughable. You've got some business smarts there, but nothing in regard to curriculum, instruction and hiring and retaining high skilled instructors.
Best of luck, but we're headed out to private.