Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember those station wagons from the 1980s with the third row of seats that faced backward? How come cars are not made like that anymore if RF is safer .( Yes, this is a serious question)
We actually bought a new car because we could find exactly zero information on how safe those rear-facing seats in our E-Class were. After we established that not a single booster allows itself to be used rear facing, we felt like we couldn't responsibly carpool using the jump seats and bought an SUV instead. I even asked DCUM how to find safety info but nobody responded.
Anonymous wrote:Remember those station wagons from the 1980s with the third row of seats that faced backward? How come cars are not made like that anymore if RF is safer .( Yes, this is a serious question)
Anonymous wrote:Remember those station wagons from the 1980s with the third row of seats that faced backward? How come cars are not made like that anymore if RF is safer .( Yes, this is a serious question)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember those station wagons from the 1980s with the third row of seats that faced backward? How come cars are not made like that anymore if RF is safer .( Yes, this is a serious question)
Because they wanted to stop giving kids such an easy opportunity to make rude gestures and faces at the driver behind them.
(Or was that just my sisters and me?)
Anonymous wrote:Remember those station wagons from the 1980s with the third row of seats that faced backward? How come cars are not made like that anymore if RF is safer .( Yes, this is a serious question)
Anonymous wrote:Remember those station wagons from the 1980s with the third row of seats that faced backward? How come cars are not made like that anymore if RF is safer .( Yes, this is a serious question)
Anonymous wrote:Remember those station wagons from the 1980s with the third row of seats that faced backward? How come cars are not made like that anymore if RF is safer .( Yes, this is a serious question)