Anonymous wrote:OP, I apologize for aiming my comment at you. I thought you were the mom in question.
One last comment for 18:30 - "tit for tat" for invites is otherwise known as etiquette. If someone invites you somewhere, good etiquette says you reciprocate. Weddings are another story all together. We're talking about birthday invitations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those aren't standards. It's called being immature - which she should be at 7yo. It's up to parents to teach kids what's right and wrong so as they mature they can tell the difference. OP taught her daughter that it's ok to arbitrarily leave a classmate out for a silly reason. Not good parenting.
Arbitrary? Really? She didn't not include her because she dresses funny or has bad breath. She doesn't like the girl because she has bad taste and makes immature jokes. I for one would not one a child like at my son's birthday. Why teach your child tit for tat on invites? This reminds me of all the BS about bridesmaids. She asked me to be in her wedding, so I have to ask her to be in mine. NO! That doesn't have to happen! Break the cycle people and grow a backbone!
If she didn't like the little girl so much, why did she attend her birthday party after not inviting her to her own? Why didn't her mother explain that it's not right to go to the excluded girl's party because her daughter doesn't like her?
Anonymous wrote:OP, I cannot believe that you'd rather lay the blame for being mean at the feet of your 7yo daughter rather than admit that you should have handled it differently.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I cannot believe that you'd rather lay the blame for being mean at the feet of your 7yo daughter rather than admit that you should have handled it differently.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those aren't standards. It's called being immature - which she should be at 7yo. It's up to parents to teach kids what's right and wrong so as they mature they can tell the difference. OP taught her daughter that it's ok to arbitrarily leave a classmate out for a silly reason. Not good parenting.
Arbitrary? Really? She didn't not include her because she dresses funny or has bad breath. She doesn't like the girl because she has bad taste and makes immature jokes. I for one would not one a child like at my son's birthday. Why teach your child tit for tat on invites? This reminds me of all the BS about bridesmaids. She asked me to be in her wedding, so I have to ask her to be in mine. NO! That doesn't have to happen! Break the cycle people and grow a backbone!
Anonymous wrote:Those aren't standards. It's called being immature - which she should be at 7yo. It's up to parents to teach kids what's right and wrong so as they mature they can tell the difference. OP taught her daughter that it's ok to arbitrarily leave a classmate out for a silly reason. Not good parenting.
Anonymous wrote:OP, I cannot believe that you'd rather lay the blame for being mean at the feet of your 7yo daughter rather than admit that you should have handled it differently.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:When you don't invite everybody from one group to a party do you explain to the "not invited" ones why they're left out?
I was reading the other thread and lots of people are saying it was rude to exclude the girl and not say why so I'm wondering here if it's normal or expected to address the crowd left out.
Thanks for any insight.
well, my dd recently made a guest list for her birthday party that excluded a girl who subsequently invited dd to her own birthday party the same weekend. we urged dd to reconsider, but she was adamant saying the other girl had a potty mouth and talked about poop and farts and she didn't want that kind of talk at her party. Keep in mind these kids are 7.
So, awkward, yes, especially since several girls attended both parties. Sure enough, come Monday, the other girl discovers her invitation wasn't reciprocated and marches up to dd to demand why. DD repeated, frankly, what she told us: That the girl had a potty mouth and thus wasn't welcome at her party.
Kids are so refreshingly honest, aren't they? On the one hand we were horrified. I'm sure the girl's parents despise us now. On the other hand, it was probably useful for the kid to hear that there are consequences for having a potty mouth.
Did your DD attend her party?
She did. Would you have had her compound the situation by declining the invitation?
She elected a party theme that was expensive. $50 per kid. As a result, we limited her to five kids. So, it wasn't a case of excluding a single girl from a classroom. Given the subsequent invitation we told her we'd allow her to invite one more child (the other birthday girl) but she had her own reasons for not wanting to do that. Good ones, too, if you ask me.
It was just an unfortunate sequence of events. We allowed her to make her own decisions in this case. She ignored our council. Now she's having to navigate the social consequences. And the other girl is learning that others don't take kindly to talk about poop and farts, I guess.
My daughter doesn't have a potty mouth. But you know, I'd rather she did, than that she acted like a mean little bitch.
Excuse me? Would you like to retract that comment you just made about my child? That finger you just pointed at my child? Take a look at your hand. Three fingers point back at you.
Deciding you don't wish to have a running commentary about feces and gastrointestinal noises at your birthday party is actually a pretty sound reason in my book. Had dd offered up some lesser articulated reason or no reason at all I probably would have pushed harder. But at 7, they're old enough to make guest list selections without the interference of a helicopter mother.