Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I disagree. I think the lower school is excellent, and the middle school is flailing. If I could magically take my child out of Burgundy MS I would, but he loves his friends. They have had a lot of turnover at the MS - new teachers, new head-- and somehow things just never gelled.
+1. The lower school is wonderful. The middle school is disappointing. The kids don't learn how to write papers or essays. The grammar instruction is non-existent. The kids are compassionate and well versed on all kinds of social issues when they graduate, but they lack the essential writing skills kids in other private schools are receiving. The grades issued are ridiculously harsh, almost in an effort to make the school seem more rigorous. My child stayed because of close friendships, not because of the academics. Yes, I regret it.
Anonymous wrote:I disagree. I think the lower school is excellent, and the middle school is flailing. If I could magically take my child out of Burgundy MS I would, but he loves his friends. They have had a lot of turnover at the MS - new teachers, new head-- and somehow things just never gelled.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Things settled down. They brought in several new teachers and staff, as well as a new MS head and a new learning support specialist. I was very nervous at the beginning of the year, and I do think the first month of school was a little bumpy, but now that everyone has settled in things seem to be fine. I don't know the new MS head well but the new teachers all seem great, and I have been impressed by the new learning specialist, too.
I think MS has gotten more "academic" in the last 5 years or so: more emphasis on grades, more challenging assignments, more tests, more homework and so on. I am not entirely crazy about this, but many families like it.
Overall, Burgundy is still Burgundy: pleasantly idiosyncratic on a good day; annoying disorganized on a bad day, but basically very friendly and nurturing.
Anonymous wrote:Yes. Things settled down. They brought in several new teachers and staff, as well as a new MS head and a new learning support specialist. I was very nervous at the beginning of the year, and I do think the first month of school was a little bumpy, but now that everyone has settled in things seem to be fine. I don't know the new MS head well but the new teachers all seem great, and I have been impressed by the new learning specialist, too.
I think MS has gotten more "academic" in the last 5 years or so: more emphasis on grades, more challenging assignments, more tests, more homework and so on. I am not entirely crazy about this, but many families like it.
Overall, Burgundy is still Burgundy: pleasantly idiosyncratic on a good day; annoying disorganized on a bad day, but basically very friendly and nurturing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, the reason people pick public schools coming out of Burgundy is because they are hard core Dems. Private Highschool for the most part is the home of the conservative Right, at least in the DMV... No Quaker schools... So those that are Dems will opt to send their Burgundy kids to public, where they tend to dominate academically and exceed socially...
True spoken words of one who has never been anywhere near a private school.
Anonymous wrote:Hey, the reason people pick public schools coming out of Burgundy is because they are hard core Dems. Private Highschool for the most part is the home of the conservative Right, at least in the DMV... No Quaker schools... So those that are Dems will opt to send their Burgundy kids to public, where they tend to dominate academically and exceed socially...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hey, the reason people pick public schools coming out of Burgundy is because they are hard core Dems. Private Highschool for the most part is the home of the conservative Right, at least in the DMV... No Quaker schools... So those that are Dems will opt to send their Burgundy kids to public, where they tend to dominate academically and exceed socially...
Not from what I saw, and I'm no Burgundy fan. Some private HS in the area really aren't terribly leftie. Beyond that, a number of the Burgundy kids did extremely well in public high schools. But looked to me like many simply flopped, wound up in alternative programs, weren't college-bound (or at least traditional college-bound), etc. I think it can be difficult to categorize Burgundy purely by politics; the entire program seemed to be such an alternative program, so completely alien to anything educational, that the results always seemed to me to be disuniform and very much hit-or-miss. I remember one year when a good 1/5 of the graduating class was revealed to have not enrolled in college, or enrolled only at two-year programs, or taken gap years with no pre-granted admission reported anywhere.