Anonymous wrote: New YY parent-- I have never met the "nut job" but I like his suggestions. Honestly, the whole idea of making people pay to vote is fraught with problems, it makes me question the judgment of those who suggested it. "Nut job" might not be a bad alternative.
Anonymous wrote:If he gets elected it will undo the PA, and that is not intended to be hyperbole. The school admin can't work with him. Unlike what the PP said, it isn't that he isn't a "yes man". His rigid thinking would put the whole organization at a stand still. I hope people realize that his 11th hour ploys are just a way to rail road his own personal agenda. It might all look fabulous to present these changes, but you need to question why would someone suddenly go against the bylaws that have been in the works for 12 MONTHS?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because for many "pay to vote" with a high $ amount, poll tax, is unacceptable and personally, I'll not support an organization, especially a public school PA, that has such a policy.
Did you pay the school supplies fee before it became a poll tax?
Yes and happily.
It doesn't bother you that someone else is paying for your child's supplies while you take this moral stand? Why not pay AND complain/argue for a change?
I paid the fee. Paid the fee. Paid. Sigh. All paid up but will not be paying anything in the future to the PA if the "pay to vote" poll tax stays.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because for many "pay to vote" with a high $ amount, poll tax, is unacceptable and personally, I'll not support an organization, especially a public school PA, that has such a policy.
Did you pay the school supplies fee before it became a poll tax?
Yes and happily.
It doesn't bother you that someone else is paying for your child's supplies while you take this moral stand? Why not pay AND complain/argue for a change?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because for many "pay to vote" with a high $ amount, poll tax, is unacceptable and personally, I'll not support an organization, especially a public school PA, that has such a policy.
Did you pay the school supplies fee before it became a poll tax?
Yes and happily.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is this thread being fueled by the same lunatic who is trying to write his own version of the bylaws or create a second PA or something? That guy appears to be a complete nut-job.
Whoa, I've actually read both versions of the by-laws (and authored neither), and the "nut-job" version is clearly superior as to both style and substance.
Please stop calling this man a nut job. In the three years since my child has attended this school, this man has been very active in the betterment of the school. He does not drop and roll like many of the parents. He gives of his time, whether you like him not, he is far from a nut job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because for many "pay to vote" with a high $ amount, poll tax, is unacceptable and personally, I'll not support an organization, especially a public school PA, that has such a policy.
Did you pay the school supplies fee before it became a poll tax?
Anonymous wrote:Is linking the $100 supply fee to voting their attempt to collect more fees from parents who can afford it? Why were parents who could afford to pay not paying when the fee had nothing to do with voting?
Anonymous wrote:Because for many "pay to vote" with a high $ amount, poll tax, is unacceptable and personally, I'll not support an organization, especially a public school PA, that has such a policy.