Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the poly critics, how many Brooklyn schools are clearly better academically? 1 or 2? What are you measuring this by other than “my son’s soccer teammates’ parents are bozos and went decades ago”?
Packer for sure. I’d argue Saint Ann’s and Basis as well. The SHSATs including Brooklyn Latin as a noob seem way more academic and better as far as a balanced culture.
All of those other than Packer are freak shows in different ways. No thanks. I’m not president of Poly’s fan club but it is ok.
More Brooklyn kids are going to Friends and Grace as they aren’t that far, or even venturing further uptown.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the poly critics, how many Brooklyn schools are clearly better academically? 1 or 2? What are you measuring this by other than “my son’s soccer teammates’ parents are bozos and went decades ago”?
Packer for sure. I’d argue Saint Ann’s and Basis as well. The SHSATs including Brooklyn Latin as a noob seem way more academic and better as far as a balanced culture.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:To the poly critics, how many Brooklyn schools are clearly better academically? 1 or 2? What are you measuring this by other than “my son’s soccer teammates’ parents are bozos and went decades ago”?
Packer for sure. I’d argue Saint Ann’s and Basis as well. The SHSATs including Brooklyn Latin as a noob seem way more academic and better as far as a balanced culture.
Anonymous wrote:To the poly critics, how many Brooklyn schools are clearly better academically? 1 or 2? What are you measuring this by other than “my son’s soccer teammates’ parents are bozos and went decades ago”?
Anonymous wrote:I’m in Brooklyn and had no idea Poly was impressive. I have a very negative view of the school and the academics there. There’s more to life than exmissions and the lifers who are now adult and the children I know there are not academic, not particularly bright, not community minded at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m in Brooklyn and had no idea Poly was impressive. I have a very negative view of the school and the academics there. There’s more to life than exmissions and the lifers who are now adult and the children I know there are not academic, not particularly bright, not community minded at all.
A lot of reputation and cache starts as unfounded folklore on social media and website like this and just kind of catches on because people “read about it”. So a lot of hidden gems get missed and conversely other schools have overinflated and hyped up expectations
Anonymous wrote:I’m in Brooklyn and had no idea Poly was impressive. I have a very negative view of the school and the academics there. There’s more to life than exmissions and the lifers who are now adult and the children I know there are not academic, not particularly bright, not community minded at all.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking at CGPS IG - I just don't see how it's considered 4T. If it's 4T then the college placement staff needs raises.
from the looks of IG page roughly 55% go to elite/T30 school and probaby another 25% go to T50 school.
I think it was omitted then added as 3T. Which is more accurate.
its very good placement for a school that widely is viewed negatively here.
Part of the reason it is viewed negatively is the types of families there. I know some wonderful people there - don't get my wrong. But I also know a disproportionate number of people who are not my types. And I am not alone. And I am particularly not putting up with that for a non-TT school that has good/very good but not great exmissions.
You can hate the families but that doesn't mean the school sucks. Feel like many can't separate the two.
I would guess Fieldston would be the other end of the political spectrum. someone might hate it politically but acknowledge the good teaching/college matriculation
No one said the school sucks. It is a very solid 3T - closer to 2T than 4T but 3T. Think you're just getting a little defensive as a MAGA in NYC. No one said this is political. Some of the people I know there who I can't stand are hard core Democrats. Though the school likely does skew more R than most.
To your bigger point which I agree with but you could have made more eloquently, and as many of us have been trying to say, you need to know the culture of the school. Different schools draw different crowds. Different grades within the same school might have different crowds, and it is hard to get that granular.
I agree with the commentary on the type of parents - so not being defensive in that regard. Sorry if it came across that way. The question is do people view it as 4T because of the political views of the parents/school or the actual education/college outcomes.
and for the record I am not a MAGA!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking at CGPS IG - I just don't see how it's considered 4T. If it's 4T then the college placement staff needs raises.
from the looks of IG page roughly 55% go to elite/T30 school and probaby another 25% go to T50 school.
I think it was omitted then added as 3T. Which is more accurate.
its very good placement for a school that widely is viewed negatively here.
Part of the reason it is viewed negatively is the types of families there. I know some wonderful people there - don't get my wrong. But I also know a disproportionate number of people who are not my types. And I am not alone. And I am particularly not putting up with that for a non-TT school that has good/very good but not great exmissions.
This. It’s a flashy crowd. You have to be ok with that.
Does it really matter past elementary school?
Like in high school - they take i think 30 or 40 new kids. I wouldn't expect those parents to be heavily involved in the school. i could be wrong.
That's up to you how much it matters. The school has a culture, it's influenced by these families, and the administration is perfectly fine with it. That kind of in-your-face wealth makes some people uncomfortable.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking at CGPS IG - I just don't see how it's considered 4T. If it's 4T then the college placement staff needs raises.
from the looks of IG page roughly 55% go to elite/T30 school and probaby another 25% go to T50 school.
I think it was omitted then added as 3T. Which is more accurate.
its very good placement for a school that widely is viewed negatively here.
Part of the reason it is viewed negatively is the types of families there. I know some wonderful people there - don't get my wrong. But I also know a disproportionate number of people who are not my types. And I am not alone. And I am particularly not putting up with that for a non-TT school that has good/very good but not great exmissions.
You can hate the families but that doesn't mean the school sucks. Feel like many can't separate the two.
I would guess Fieldston would be the other end of the political spectrum. someone might hate it politically but acknowledge the good teaching/college matriculation
No one said the school sucks. It is a very solid 3T - closer to 2T than 4T but 3T. Think you're just getting a little defensive as a MAGA in NYC. No one said this is political. Some of the people I know there who I can't stand are hard core Democrats. Though the school likely does skew more R than most.
To your bigger point which I agree with but you could have made more eloquently, and as many of us have been trying to say, you need to know the culture of the school. Different schools draw different crowds. Different grades within the same school might have different crowds, and it is hard to get that granular.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Looking at CGPS IG - I just don't see how it's considered 4T. If it's 4T then the college placement staff needs raises.
from the looks of IG page roughly 55% go to elite/T30 school and probaby another 25% go to T50 school.
I think it was omitted then added as 3T. Which is more accurate.
its very good placement for a school that widely is viewed negatively here.
Part of the reason it is viewed negatively is the types of families there. I know some wonderful people there - don't get my wrong. But I also know a disproportionate number of people who are not my types. And I am not alone. And I am particularly not putting up with that for a non-TT school that has good/very good but not great exmissions.
You can hate the families but that doesn't mean the school sucks. Feel like many can't separate the two.
I would guess Fieldston would be the other end of the political spectrum. someone might hate it politically but acknowledge the good teaching/college matriculation