Anonymous wrote:
Why aren’t colleges going to care if a kid took algebra 1 in 6th grade and is doing DE by the time they are in 12th grade?
So, there’s no college admissions advantage to take it in grade 6?
May be MIT, and other stem engineering T20 colleges may care?
Anonymous wrote:Taking Algebra 1 in grade 7 instead of grade 6, put the kid at a disadvantage?
No. Taking it in 8th grade rather than 7th might put the kid at a disadvantage. Taking it in 6th could be advantageous for your specific kid, if they're already completely ready for algebra, love math, and want to take more of the advanced classes. The only potential disadvantage of not taking it in 6th is that your kid might be pretty bored for an extra year. Colleges aren't going to care either way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
What kind of silly reasoning is that? Do you really think FCPS is making decisions based on parents wanting bragging rights? My student and many of their 6th grade friends are doing enjoying Algebra 1. It’s not super or advanced advanced, just a solid challenge that keeps them from getting bored in math.
That's the thing. I haven't heard a reason behind all of this. Where's the research? Where's the why? It seems like a whim.
Real leadership isn’t always about relying on "research", or waiting for a study or a past example to justify every move. Otherwise you just keep repeating the same old outcomes. What Reed is trying to do is break that pattern that only kids with well-off middle class highly involved parents can succeed in advanced math. Instead, FCPS wants to show that students from poor families without that background can do just as well, if only they are provided a similar challenging environment in a public school classroom.
Anonymous wrote:Taking Algebra 1 in grade 7 instead of grade 6, put the kid at a disadvantage?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:...They took A1H in 8th grade, which is still ahead of the curve.
...
The push for Algebra by 8th grade wasn’t really needed because something like 75% of the kids in the County took Algebra by 8th grade. The kids who were not taking it are kids who struggle with math and need the slower path.
You keep calling A1H in 8th "ahead of the curve," but in the very same post admit that 75% take Algebra by 8th and only the kids who struggle with math don't. Algebra 1 in 8th is not "ahead of the curve," it is on target for an average (not at all advanced) student. Algebra 1 in 7th is easily doable for by good students, even those not in AAP. Algebra 1 in 6th should be only for the kids who do well in advanced math and enjoy it, but that is a much larger group of kids than you think it is. The material is not difficult for smart kids. It is only the study habits and desire to earn the A that has some of them getting B's or C's.
It seems to me like you are freaking out about it because you want to hold your kid back, and you don't want to feel guilty about so many other kids having a head start on your kid because of your decision.
Most of the Country doesn't allow Algebra 1 in until 8th grade and it is not a large percentage of the kids. FCPS has a different bar but nationally, 9th grade is when people take Algebra 1 with the advanced kids taking it in 8th grade. FCPS's policy, prior to relaxing the rules on who can take A1H in 7th and adding A1H in 6th, was already far ahead of the rest of the country.
Going to need to see a source on this claim since the very rural part of Virginia where I grew up offered it to me a couple decades ago in 7th grade. I think you are just making stuff up at this point.
https://www.e-jps.org/archive/view_article?pid=jps-39-4-9
Here ya go. There are articles in the Wall Street Journal and NY Times that have summaries on google showing similar numbers, I don't have a subscription so I can't read them to verify.
"A typical secondary school mathematics course sequence would start with Algebra I and continue with Geometry, Algebra II, Pre-Calculus, and Calculus. For academically prepared students, enrolling in Algebra I before secondary school— typically 7th or 8th grade—gives an advantage in increasing students’ likelihood of later enrolling in higher level mathematics courses such as Calculus and Advanced Placement (AP) mathematics courses during secondary school. However, when eligible students do not have access to Algebra I in middle school their likelihood of experiencing this enrichment is decreased. In the United States (US), only 60% of schools that serve 8th graders offer Algebra I and 24% of all 8th graders are enrolled in the course (USDOE, 2018). Black and Latino students are less likely to have access to Algebra I in middle school, especially when they attend segregated schools. Despite being 15% and 25% of the overall 8th-grade population, Black and Latino students make up only 10% and 18% of students enrolled in 8th grade Algebra I (Patrick et al., 2020)."
Google Algebra in MS and take a look at the numbers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:...They took A1H in 8th grade, which is still ahead of the curve.
...
The push for Algebra by 8th grade wasn’t really needed because something like 75% of the kids in the County took Algebra by 8th grade. The kids who were not taking it are kids who struggle with math and need the slower path.
You keep calling A1H in 8th "ahead of the curve," but in the very same post admit that 75% take Algebra by 8th and only the kids who struggle with math don't. Algebra 1 in 8th is not "ahead of the curve," it is on target for an average (not at all advanced) student. Algebra 1 in 7th is easily doable for by good students, even those not in AAP. Algebra 1 in 6th should be only for the kids who do well in advanced math and enjoy it, but that is a much larger group of kids than you think it is. The material is not difficult for smart kids. It is only the study habits and desire to earn the A that has some of them getting B's or C's.
It seems to me like you are freaking out about it because you want to hold your kid back, and you don't want to feel guilty about so many other kids having a head start on your kid because of your decision.
Most of the Country doesn't allow Algebra 1 in until 8th grade and it is not a large percentage of the kids. FCPS has a different bar but nationally, 9th grade is when people take Algebra 1 with the advanced kids taking it in 8th grade. FCPS's policy, prior to relaxing the rules on who can take A1H in 7th and adding A1H in 6th, was already far ahead of the rest of the country.
Going to need to see a source on this claim since the very rural part of Virginia where I grew up offered it to me a couple decades ago in 7th grade. I think you are just making stuff up at this point.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s been surprisingly successful at my child’s school. They have two full classes of 6th grade algebra students (and 2 of 6th grade advanced math).
What I will say is from helping neighbor kids who stayed at the base school, the online version is very, very remedial compared to what is taught in a typical algebra 1 class. If online is the only option, I might hold back.
My daughter has half her 6th grade class doing algebra 1. Kids were crying over it, at least 3-4 kids have tutors, several kids go to outside math programs, and one kid is consistently cheating. And the majority of them are miserable. If all these kids were ready for it, none of this would be necessary. For title 1 kids, given them access without the supports or underlying math foundations is a recipe for disaster. Not everyone will be able to afford the supplements needed to make it through.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:...They took A1H in 8th grade, which is still ahead of the curve.
...
The push for Algebra by 8th grade wasn’t really needed because something like 75% of the kids in the County took Algebra by 8th grade. The kids who were not taking it are kids who struggle with math and need the slower path.
You keep calling A1H in 8th "ahead of the curve," but in the very same post admit that 75% take Algebra by 8th and only the kids who struggle with math don't. Algebra 1 in 8th is not "ahead of the curve," it is on target for an average (not at all advanced) student. Algebra 1 in 7th is easily doable for by good students, even those not in AAP. Algebra 1 in 6th should be only for the kids who do well in advanced math and enjoy it, but that is a much larger group of kids than you think it is. The material is not difficult for smart kids. It is only the study habits and desire to earn the A that has some of them getting B's or C's.
It seems to me like you are freaking out about it because you want to hold your kid back, and you don't want to feel guilty about so many other kids having a head start on your kid because of your decision.
Most of the Country doesn't allow Algebra 1 in until 8th grade and it is not a large percentage of the kids. FCPS has a different bar but nationally, 9th grade is when people take Algebra 1 with the advanced kids taking it in 8th grade. FCPS's policy, prior to relaxing the rules on who can take A1H in 7th and adding A1H in 6th, was already far ahead of the rest of the country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:...They took A1H in 8th grade, which is still ahead of the curve.
...
The push for Algebra by 8th grade wasn’t really needed because something like 75% of the kids in the County took Algebra by 8th grade. The kids who were not taking it are kids who struggle with math and need the slower path.
You keep calling A1H in 8th "ahead of the curve," but in the very same post admit that 75% take Algebra by 8th and only the kids who struggle with math don't. Algebra 1 in 8th is not "ahead of the curve," it is on target for an average (not at all advanced) student. Algebra 1 in 7th is easily doable for by good students, even those not in AAP. Algebra 1 in 6th should be only for the kids who do well in advanced math and enjoy it, but that is a much larger group of kids than you think it is. The material is not difficult for smart kids. It is only the study habits and desire to earn the A that has some of them getting B's or C's.
It seems to me like you are freaking out about it because you want to hold your kid back, and you don't want to feel guilty about so many other kids having a head start on your kid because of your decision.
Anonymous wrote:...They took A1H in 8th grade, which is still ahead of the curve.
...
The push for Algebra by 8th grade wasn’t really needed because something like 75% of the kids in the County took Algebra by 8th grade. The kids who were not taking it are kids who struggle with math and need the slower path.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
What kind of silly reasoning is that? Do you really think FCPS is making decisions based on parents wanting bragging rights? My student and many of their 6th grade friends are doing enjoying Algebra 1. It’s not super or advanced advanced, just a solid challenge that keeps them from getting bored in math.
That's the thing. I haven't heard a reason behind all of this. Where's the research? Where's the why? It seems like a whim.
Anonymous wrote:It’s been surprisingly successful at my child’s school. They have two full classes of 6th grade algebra students (and 2 of 6th grade advanced math).
What I will say is from helping neighbor kids who stayed at the base school, the online version is very, very remedial compared to what is taught in a typical algebra 1 class. If online is the only option, I might hold back.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
What kind of silly reasoning is that? Do you really think FCPS is making decisions based on parents wanting bragging rights? My student and many of their 6th grade friends are doing enjoying Algebra 1. It’s not super or advanced advanced, just a solid challenge that keeps them from getting bored in math.
That's the thing. I haven't heard a reason behind all of this. Where's the research? Where's the why? It seems like a whim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think they introduced Algebra 1 in 6th grade, to give those kids/ parents who want to be super advanced in math an option to do so.
Since they have changed TJ admissions criteria, this may or may not affect TJ admissions. And may not affect college admissions depending on the major selected.
A student who has competed algebra 1 and geometry with A grade may have an edge over a student who accelerated due to patents pushing just to brag that their 6th grader is in algebra 1 and is a math prodigy, but struggled and got B, B- or C.
What kind of silly reasoning is that? Do you really think FCPS is making decisions based on parents wanting bragging rights? My student and many of their 6th grade friends are doing enjoying Algebra 1. It’s not super or advanced advanced, just a solid challenge that keeps them from getting bored in math.
That's the thing. I haven't heard a reason behind all of this. Where's the research? Where's the why? It seems like a whim.
Real leadership isn’t always about relying on "research", or waiting for a study or a past example to justify every move. Otherwise you just keep repeating the same old outcomes. What Reed is trying to do is break that pattern that only kids with well-off middle class highly involved parents can succeed in advanced math. Instead, FCPS wants to show that students from poor families without that background can do just as well, if only they are provided a similar challenging environment in a public school classroom.
Anonymous wrote:If they aren't, they can repeat or take ab then bc or stats the bc or stats then ab etcAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s been surprisingly successful at my child’s school. They have two full classes of 6th grade algebra students (and 2 of 6th grade advanced math).
What I will say is from helping neighbor kids who stayed at the base school, the online version is very, very remedial compared to what is taught in a typical algebra 1 class. If online is the only option, I might hold back.
I think the measure of success will come later. Will these kids be able to handle calculus when they are high school sophomores? What options for math will be available to them as juniors and seniors? How will this impact their college choices?