Anonymous wrote:Did we talk about the Bridesmaids reunion yet? Rose Byrne looked fabulous as we’ve mentioned, Ellie Kemper also perfect, Kristen Wiig was OK. Maya looked like she always does (I love her but I’ve never liked what she wears) but Melissa McCarthy looked godawful.

I personally love Rose's look the most out of this group but think they all look like themselves and yet complimentary in a good way. No complaints.

Also I thought it was funny that Wendy McLendon-Covey posted that the only reason she didn't make the reunion is that she just had a neck lift (because she says she was tired of looking like a melting candle) and is still recovering. Funniest reason ever to miss doing a bit at the oscars.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

Another view. I think it looks boring and too basic but fine from the front, and then she turns and you're like "oh. she's naked." Having the cut up the sides isn't really sex because it's invisible from the straight on view. So unlike a high leg slit or cut outs or something, there's no inkling that the dress is even meant to be sexy at all. It just look like a white strapless sheath. And then it's SO revealing from the side that it almost feels embarrassing, like you question if it fits her correctly because why would you want a dress that looks like it's just two strips of fabric pasted to your front and back? It's not sexy, it's not interesting, it's not flattering.

Sigourney Weaver, fantastic job

Did we talk about the Bridesmaids reunion yet? Rose Byrne looked fabulous as we’ve mentioned, Ellie Kemper also perfect, Kristen Wiig was OK. Maya looked like she always does (I love her but I’ve never liked what she wears) but Melissa McCarthy looked godawful.

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

I just dozed off looking at this.

Anonymous wrote:I'm going to post this as a PSA, just because it is *so much* better when people can embed photos with their comments.

Here is how to post a photo:

1. Find a photo online
2. Right click on the photo and select "open photo in new window/tab"
3. Copy the link from the new window tab (note: it needs to be in a standard photo format like .jpg, if you are pulling from any major media source or Google photos, it usually is)
4. Paste link into DCUM post editor
5. Select link and then click the "Image" button at the top of the editor, which will surround the link with html brackets so that the photo is embedded
6. Always good to check preview before posting to just make sure the embed worked

I know it sounds like a lot but some folks are posting extensive comments with no photo and it's just not as fun to read. No one wants to click on a link and scroll to the photo you're talking about, that's too much work. Embedding photos makes for a much more fun conversation here. I post as many as I can but I'm just one person.

Or right click on your image and select copy image address, click the Img button on DCUM, paste your image address, then click Img button again to get your closing bracket.

I'm going to post this as a PSA, just because it is *so much* better when people can embed photos with their comments.

Here is how to post a photo:

1. Find a photo online
2. Right click on the photo and select "open photo in new window/tab"
3. Copy the link from the new window tab (note: it needs to be in a standard photo format like .jpg, if you are pulling from any major media source or Google photos, it usually is)
4. Paste link into DCUM post editor
5. Select link and then click the "Image" button at the top of the editor, which will surround the link with html brackets so that the photo is embedded
6. Always good to check preview before posting to just make sure the embed worked

I know it sounds like a lot but some folks are posting extensive comments with no photo and it's just not as fun to read. No one wants to click on a link and scroll to the photo you're talking about, that's too much work. Embedding photos makes for a much more fun conversation here. I post as many as I can but I'm just one person.

Anonymous wrote:The best clip of the night comes from the after party red carpet when Nicole Kidman walks behind Lauren Sanchez posing.
Prefect class vs trash.

pure gold

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ozempification of Hollywood has gotten out of hand. Some of these women look like walking skeletons. Georgina Chapman, Demi Moore...shocking. Refreshing to see some normal actresses like Rachel McAdams and Kate Hudson, who look like they simply eat healthily and work out.

+1. So many people looking positively skeletal.

I’m more weirded out by the plastic surgery faces. At some point, looking 20 years younger than your real age isn’t impressive. It’s just weird looking.

I agree with this only I don't feel like people actually look 20 years younger. Some maybe do, like Nicole Kidman seems to be constantly perfecting her face and it is kind of crazy how young she looks, but for the most part I feel like people just look like they've been injected and pulled and tucked and botoxed. They may look smoother and plumper and more defined than you expect someone in their 50s/60s/70s to look, but they don't look young. Just worked on.

I lived in LA and worked in a Hollywood adjacent industry for a time, and I have this very vivid memory of going out to dinner with my BF towards the end of my time there, and realizing that people there just get a warped idea of what looks good. He took me out to a nicer restaurant that is frequented by Hollywood types, and while I was one of the youngest women in the room (who didn't work there) everyone else was so skinny and toned and tanned and whitened and highlighted and botoxed and plumped and perfected. It didn't make me feel bad about myself, I just felt like an alien. When that's what everyone looks like, it feels like that's what you're supposed to look like, and you loose perspective. I left my job and moved back east not long after that, and was happy to leave that bubble.

But now the same thing is happening here. It's really too bad. I love people's natural faces. You really do not have to do this to yourself just because you have the funds!

Basing my comments off this article: https://variety.com/gallery/2026-oscars-red-carpet-fashion-looks/98th-annual-oscars-arrivals-64/

Jessie Buckley: I don't mind it
Ginnifer Goodwin: A disaster. Her hair and makeup are awful. She's too pale for this look.
Nina Gold: Absurdly casual for this event.
Wunmi Mosaku: Agree with a PP; love the color and sparkles, not a fan of the neckline
Kerry Condon: She looks incredibly awkward, but I HATE the top. I'm not a fan of that style at all.
Wagner Moura: Silver fox. He looks good!
Odessa A’zion: Looks messy and inappropriate for this event
Liza Powel O’Brien: Can't stand the top. It looks like something you'd wear for BDSM.
McKenna Grace: Gorgeous and elegant.
Lea Myren: trying to be the next Bjork? I don't mean that as a compliment.
Lola Kirke: It looks like she threw on 2-3 dresses to make this bizarre combination dress.
Emily V. Gordon: Interesting! I think it's pretty.
Chase Infiniti: I might have put her in a different color? The bodice fits her SO well.
Misty Copeland: Horrifyingly ugly dress
Barbie Ferreira: I hate this dress. The bodice doesn't fit her and the bottom of the bodice looks like a 5-year-old took scissors to it. The bottom is a weird buttoned skirt. Yuck.
Rose Byrne: stunning
Felicity Jones: I don't like the color, the fit, the weird mesh netting...hard pass.
Charithra Chandran: the color is beautiful but way too much dress
Bella Thorne: awful dress, but she's an awful human.
May Hong: I'll be so thrilled when this ugly sheer panel/let's pretend we're nude trend dies.
Kevin O’Leary: Proof money can't buy you class or fashion

...there are more, but my snark is running low.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The ozempification of Hollywood has gotten out of hand. Some of these women look like walking skeletons. Georgina Chapman, Demi Moore...shocking. Refreshing to see some normal actresses like Rachel McAdams and Kate Hudson, who look like they simply eat healthily and work out.

+1. So many people looking positively skeletal.

I’m more weirded out by the plastic surgery faces. At some point, looking 20 years younger than your real age isn’t impressive. It’s just weird looking.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

You can say "sex appeal," grandma.

Anonymous wrote:The ozempification of Hollywood has gotten out of hand. Some of these women look like walking skeletons. Georgina Chapman, Demi Moore...shocking. Refreshing to see some normal actresses like Rachel McAdams and Kate Hudson, who look like they simply eat healthily and work out.

+1. So many people looking positively skeletal.

Anonymous wrote:Love this from the front. Side view is slit all way up to her waist, which I kind of like on the red one, but not so much on Gwyneth.

She doesn't have the you-know-what appeal to wear this kind of dress. Very stiff and wooden.

The ozempification of Hollywood has gotten out of hand. Some of these women look like walking skeletons. Georgina Chapman, Demi Moore...shocking. Refreshing to see some normal actresses like Rachel McAdams and Kate Hudson, who look like they simply eat healthily and work out.