Anonymous wrote:Arlington second team is like that weird aunt or uncle who is always at Thanksgiving dinner but you never quite know why or who invited them. Or like a dead whale carcass that bobs and floats along as other sea animal take bites out of it little by little. Or a duraflame log that burns low and slow but produces little heat and leaves you cold. Or like a man with ED that tries and tries but can never quite be ready to satisfy.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington second team is like that weird aunt or uncle who is always at Thanksgiving dinner but you never quite know why or who invited them. Or like a dead whale carcass that bobs and floats along as other sea animal take bites out of it little by little. Or a duraflame log that burns low and slow but produces little heat and leaves you cold. Or like a man with ED that tries and tries but can never quite be ready to satisfy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:2013 picked up about 8-9 and 2014 picked up about 5-6.
This is completely false. They did not have 13-15 outside girls at tryouts and they had combined the 2013-14 tryouts.
Arlington recruits--not all outside players have to tryout
That's dumb
You would judge a person's play on one day as opposed to perhaps four years of practice and games? No purpose at all to have existing players there. They know those players. If they were an 8 and played a 10 or a 6 on that day it would not matter. And having them there detracts from the ability to focus on the new people.
Sorry it is dumb. They take outside girls based on two practices but overlook the records of girls from other Arlington teams that have been playing on the red team.
Dumb unless you are trying to expand your customer base and drive profit.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington second team is like that weird aunt or uncle who is always at Thanksgiving dinner but you never quite know why or who invited them. Or like a dead whale carcass that bobs and floats along as other sea animal take bites out of it little by little. Or a duraflame log that burns low and slow but produces little heat and leaves you cold. Or like a man with ED that tries and tries but can never quite be ready to satisfy.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington second team is like that weird aunt or uncle who is always at Thanksgiving dinner but you never quite know why or who invited them. Or like a dead whale carcass that bobs and floats along as other sea animal take bites out of it little by little. Or a duraflame log that burns low and slow but produces little heat and leaves you cold. Or like a man with ED that tries and tries but can never quite be ready to satisfy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get it. Your RL kid is great. But the NL kids practice more, practice against harder competition, play against harder competition day in and day out, year after year. It is a difficult thing for RL kids to overcome, the lack of training and playing competition after the first ECNL year, unless your kid is doing way more outside training, which the NL kids are also doing. So, is your kid practicing more, playing against better competition, and training more outside of club practices? If you can’t say absolutely yes, then you really shouldn’t think your DC is in the same boat, neither should the coaches.
100 percent correct. As good as my kid is, by age 14 there is no way to make up the gap. Parents are deluded. But I do also fault the clubs, who give the illusion of development and advancement. It won’t happen by HS so don’t expect it. And that is the right thing, actually, but definitely disingenuous of the clubs to suggest that it can happen.
I agree with this, but why not give the equally good kid on the red team who has been loyal to the club the chance? It's so frustrating. My kid with the 4x a week practice would be crushing it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get it. Your RL kid is great. But the NL kids practice more, practice against harder competition, play against harder competition day in and day out, year after year. It is a difficult thing for RL kids to overcome, the lack of training and playing competition after the first ECNL year, unless your kid is doing way more outside training, which the NL kids are also doing. So, is your kid practicing more, playing against better competition, and training more outside of club practices? If you can’t say absolutely yes, then you really shouldn’t think your DC is in the same boat, neither should the coaches.
100 percent correct. As good as my kid is, by age 14 there is no way to make up the gap. Parents are deluded. But I do also fault the clubs, who give the illusion of development and advancement. It won’t happen by HS so don’t expect it. And that is the right thing, actually, but definitely disingenuous of the clubs to suggest that it can happen.
I agree with this, but why not give the equally good kid on the red team who has been loyal to the club the chance? It's so frustrating. My kid with the 4x a week practice would be crushing it.
Because they know you won’t leave
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We get it. Your RL kid is great. But the NL kids practice more, practice against harder competition, play against harder competition day in and day out, year after year. It is a difficult thing for RL kids to overcome, the lack of training and playing competition after the first ECNL year, unless your kid is doing way more outside training, which the NL kids are also doing. So, is your kid practicing more, playing against better competition, and training more outside of club practices? If you can’t say absolutely yes, then you really shouldn’t think your DC is in the same boat, neither should the coaches.
100 percent correct. As good as my kid is, by age 14 there is no way to make up the gap. Parents are deluded. But I do also fault the clubs, who give the illusion of development and advancement. It won’t happen by HS so don’t expect it. And that is the right thing, actually, but definitely disingenuous of the clubs to suggest that it can happen.
I agree with this, but why not give the equally good kid on the red team who has been loyal to the club the chance? It's so frustrating. My kid with the 4x a week practice would be crushing it.