Anonymous wrote:Maybe don't use DOJ and IRS to go after political enemies.

Again, who was in charge of the IRS when this leak occurred?

Anonymous wrote:Maybe don't use DOJ and IRS to go after political enemies.

So you think criminals should get away with their crimes so long as they committed the crimes for political purposes?

Anonymous wrote:How do you apply?

Build a golden statue of Trump and worship it.

Anonymous wrote:I’d love to see blue states enact a 100% state income tax on income from this fund. Better yet, make it 200%.

If a different president gets in power all these funds will be recovered.

I’d love to see blue states enact a 100% state income tax on income from this fund. Better yet, make it 200%.

I’m so glad that Trump has created the model for the next Democratic president to enact whatever spending program he wants free of congress. Single payer healthcare. Free college. Free childcare. All he has to do is “settle” a BS lawsuit and then pay whatever sums he wants into a fund he controls. Thanks Trump!

He's the Grifter In Chief. It's surprising how far he's gotten and he just keeps on grabbing USA cash without anyone stopping him. Mr. Moneybags.

Anonymous wrote:SNAP and ACA subsidies are terrible but $1.7 billion for rich men or insurrectionists who smeared their poop on the walls of the Capitol is ok?! The GOP has very screwed up morals.

And beat up cops and some of whom continue to accrue new offences such as the creepy guy who stalks girls in DC?

How do you apply?

SNAP and ACA subsidies are terrible but $1.7 billion for rich men or insurrectionists who smeared their poop on the walls of the Capitol is ok?! The GOP has very screwed up morals.

Anonymous wrote:Democratic lawmakers introduced the Ban Presidential Plunder of Taxpayer Funds Act, which would ban the sitting president and vice president from collecting settlement payments from the U.S., among other things.

Never pass. Now if there was something about taxing EV, solar, wind, stopping people from voting, sending troops to blue states, killing people in blue states, making sure 25% of a state citizens are not able to vote, etc it will pass very quickly.

The people have no voice and there is no democracy in the US. Republicans have stopped all funds to blues. California and Colorado are not getting fire fight funds. Why should any blue state stay in this dysfunction? This country needs to be broken apart. The blue states can join Canada. The red can F off.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok why are people outraged I don't get it? Didn't tax payer bail out the Wall street gamblers? Didn't tax payers bail out the car companies (aka GM government motors)?

You guys are acting like rich and powerful people don't use to the government for their benefits. Look at the tax code, the loopholes etc

It's always been this way.

Yes, taxpayers made those bailouts but it was approved by the congress.

Congress is supposed to declare war...it hasn't with iran.
Congress is supposed to appropriate funds...that isn't the case here.

So no, it hasn't always been this way.

Trump/Vought aren’t spending money appropriated by Congress either.

And what theya re doing is unconstitutional. We get it, the GOP only cares about laws and rules when a democrat is in office.

EO to close agencies and use the funding for something else. Have groups sue the federal government for billions and settle with these groups before it gets on a court’s docket. Brilliant. No need for Congress.

Democratic lawmakers introduced the Ban Presidential Plunder of Taxpayer Funds Act, which would ban the sitting president and vice president from collecting settlement payments from the U.S., among other things.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ok why are people outraged I don't get it? Didn't tax payer bail out the Wall street gamblers? Didn't tax payers bail out the car companies (aka GM government motors)?

You guys are acting like rich and powerful people don't use to the government for their benefits. Look at the tax code, the loopholes etc

It's always been this way.

Yes, taxpayers made those bailouts but it was approved by the congress.

Congress is supposed to declare war...it hasn't with iran.
Congress is supposed to appropriate funds...that isn't the case here.

So no, it hasn't always been this way.

Trump/Vought aren’t spending money appropriated by Congress either.

And what theya re doing is unconstitutional. We get it, the GOP only cares about laws and rules when a democrat is in office.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is so bad it even woke Fetterman up.

The house, senate and judiciary have no say in this. These moneys were appropriate by the executive branch.

Hi you may be new to America but the executive branch doesn’t appropriate money here.

Hahaha that's a good one. In theory yes. But it can use money allocated to it for something else. Many people on this forum are lawyers and they went to school to learn how to make these kind of things possible.