Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the point of MLSN2 now?

I see MLSN2 meaningless, a real scam, because many P2P clubs were lured to MLSN2 under the incentive of having a promotion/relegation system towards MLSN1, and also a pathwary for players to potentially move for 2nd teams MLSN2 up to 1st teams MLSN1.

Now those pathways are completed closed.

With this decision the winners are MLS academies and ECNL, the obvious losers are P2P clubs (both MLSN1 and MLSN2).

MLSN2 is just a 2nd team (I guess 1st for some) like they were before at clubs

Parents thinking it was an automatic route to a MLS Next team are delusional
Your kid doing what they always did that placed them on the 2nd team isn't moving up anywhere.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the point of MLSN2 now?

I see MLSN2 meaningless, a real scam, because many P2P clubs were lured to MLSN2 under the incentive of having a promotion/relegation system towards MLSN1, and also a pathwary for players to potentially move for 2nd teams MLSN2 up to 1st teams MLSN1.

Now those pathways are completed closed.

With this decision the winners are MLS academies and ECNL, the obvious losers are P2P clubs (both MLSN1 and MLSN2).

Pathways are never closed for the truly talented

It was never open to the rest

Ignoramus.

Approximately 31% of top-league soccer players are born in the first three months of the year (Q1), which is significantly more than those born in the later quarters, due to a relative age effect.

This overrepresentation is often due to the physical advantages older children have in youth leagues, leading to earlier identification and development into higher-level play.

First Quarter (Q1): Around 31% of top-league players are born in the first quarter of the year, which is significantly higher than any other quarter.
Fourth Quarter (Q4): The number of players born in the fourth quarter is substantially lower, with one study showing only about 19%.

Reasons: This difference is often attributed to the "relative age effect," where players born earlier in the calendar year are physically more developed and receive more attention in youth leagues, which are often organized by birth year.

Impact: This initial advantage can lead to a higher dropout rate for younger players, and the trend persists into professional leagues.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So how would it work when the MLS next team is playing in a tournament? For example, mls next team is birth year U14 playing in the Columbia cup. They play against the u14s that are an MLS next to team at a different club that have to play school year. So it’s feasible there would be a full year of difference between the kids if you had one team have mainly older kids and the other team have mainly younger kids in their school year. What would you do in that case? That’s not fair.

Mlsn1 teams won’t play outside tournaments or if they did a u15 BY team would be playing up against a u15 SY team.

Since both leagues are always trying to top each other MLSN1 will have to move to school year at some point, otherwise SY teams will have the advantage at every tournament.

THEY. DON'T. CARE. ABOUT. TOURNAMENT. RESULTS.

They care about developing 1-2 sellable players. At a certain point, you parents will understand development.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the point of MLSN2 now?

I see MLSN2 meaningless, a real scam, because many P2P clubs were lured to MLSN2 under the incentive of having a promotion/relegation system towards MLSN1, and also a pathwary for players to potentially move for 2nd teams MLSN2 up to 1st teams MLSN1.

Now those pathways are completed closed.

With this decision the winners are MLS academies and ECNL, the obvious losers are P2P clubs (both MLSN1 and MLSN2).

Pathways are never closed for the truly talented

It was never open to the rest

At equal talent, age and RAE rules.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the point of MLSN2 now?

I see MLSN2 meaningless, a real scam, because many P2P clubs were lured to MLSN2 under the incentive of having a promotion/relegation system towards MLSN1, and also a pathwary for players to potentially move for 2nd teams MLSN2 up to 1st teams MLSN1.

Now those pathways are completed closed.

With this decision the winners are MLS academies and ECNL, the obvious losers are P2P clubs (both MLSN1 and MLSN2).

Pathways are never closed for the truly talented

It was never open to the rest

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And just think, only a few months ago, clubs (probably via MLSN's rec) were selling MLS2 by saying each age group of tier 1 and tier 2 were "a pool of players" where tier 2 standouts could be moved up and tier 1 bench players could be moved down to get more minutes.

What a steaming crock of sh*t that was, lmao.

It actually worked like that at our club. Changing the ages seems like a disaster.

Goes to show only MLSNext is serious about player development by keeping it aligned with FIFA schedule.

Anonymous wrote:What's the point of MLSN2 now?

I see MLSN2 meaningless, a real scam, because many P2P clubs were lured to MLSN2 under the incentive of having a promotion/relegation system towards MLSN1, and also a pathwary for players to potentially move for 2nd teams MLSN2 up to 1st teams MLSN1.

Now those pathways are completed closed.

With this decision the winners are MLS academies and ECNL, the obvious losers are P2P clubs (both MLSN1 and MLSN2).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:And just think, only a few months ago, clubs (probably via MLSN's rec) were selling MLS2 by saying each age group of tier 1 and tier 2 were "a pool of players" where tier 2 standouts could be moved up and tier 1 bench players could be moved down to get more minutes.

What a steaming crock of sh*t that was, lmao.

It actually worked like that at our club. Changing the ages seems like a disaster.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's the point of MLSN2 now?

I see MLSN2 meaningless, a real scam, because many P2P clubs were lured to MLSN2 under the incentive of having a promotion/relegation system towards MLSN1, and also a pathwary for players to potentially move for 2nd teams MLSN2 up to 1st teams MLSN1.

Now those pathways are completed closed.

With this decision the winners are MLS academies and ECNL, the obvious losers are P2P clubs (both MLSN1 and MLSN2).

Pathways are never closed for the truly talented

It was never open to the rest

Anonymous wrote:What's the point of MLSN2 now?

I see MLSN2 meaningless, a real scam, because many P2P clubs were lured to MLSN2 under the incentive of having a promotion/relegation system towards MLSN1, and also a pathwary for players to potentially move for 2nd teams MLSN2 up to 1st teams MLSN1.

Now those pathways are completed closed.

With this decision the winners are MLS academies and ECNL, the obvious losers are P2P clubs (both MLSN1 and MLSN2).

Anonymous wrote:What's the point of MLSN2 now?

I see MLSN2 meaningless, a real scam, because many P2P clubs were lured to MLSN2 under the incentive of having a promotion/relegation system towards MLSN1, and also a pathwary for players to potentially move for 2nd teams MLSN2 up to 1st teams MLSN1.

Now those pathways are completed closed.

With this decision the winners are MLS academies and ECNL, the obvious losers are P2P clubs (both MLSN1 and MLSN2).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The plan is to change MLSNext to August in 2 years.

The kids on the MLSNext’s clubs’ u12 teams have been clubs’ “A” team players for the past 2-4 years. They have been with the clubs” “A” team coaches for the past 2-4 years. You can’t snap your fingers and make the kids born in August - December automatically better than the kids who have been on the “A” team
for 2-4 years.

Now, this year’s u10 kids? Yep. By switching the younger age groups to the August date the Q4 kids will get sorted out. They will be the best “A” team kids in a couple of years and MLSNext will change to the August date.

Yes - they should say that is what they are doing. But, if you did so you would be confirming the obvious that birthdate matters a huge amount.

Can you post a link to that MLS Next internal document showing the change in 2 years?

MLSN changing to SY in 27/28 was mentioned a few times in earlier threads going back to late summer. I have a hard time believing MLSN has thought that far ahead.

You having a hard time is the proof that a change is happening in 2 years?

You have a hard time with reading comprehension? How does “I have a hard time believing MLSN has thought that far ahead” mean that I think MLSN is changing in two years?

Let me phrase it differently for you. Changing in two years would imply a plan. I don’t think MLSN has a plan.

I thought it was silly to change. However, when 97% of the organizations decided to change, I assumed logistically, they would change.

There is going to be so much sorting on the field and “when were you born?” going on. If they would have just went full school year like everybody else, you can build in BY breaks like international breaks where you compile BY teams for play and potential U.S. national team preparing, etc.

It will just be interesting to see how this looks on the ground level. I don’t think they thought this through logistically.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The plan is to change MLSNext to August in 2 years.

The kids on the MLSNext’s clubs’ u12 teams have been clubs’ “A” team players for the past 2-4 years. They have been with the clubs” “A” team coaches for the past 2-4 years. You can’t snap your fingers and make the kids born in August - December automatically better than the kids who have been on the “A” team
for 2-4 years.

Now, this year’s u10 kids? Yep. By switching the younger age groups to the August date the Q4 kids will get sorted out. They will be the best “A” team kids in a couple of years and MLSNext will change to the August date.

Yes - they should say that is what they are doing. But, if you did so you would be confirming the obvious that birthdate matters a huge amount.

Can you post a link to that MLS Next internal document showing the change in 2 years?

MLSN changing to SY in 27/28 was mentioned a few times in earlier threads going back to late summer. I have a hard time believing MLSN has thought that far ahead.

You having a hard time is the proof that a change is happening in 2 years?

You have a hard time with reading comprehension? How does “I have a hard time believing MLSN has thought that far ahead” mean that I think MLSN is changing in two years?

Let me phrase it differently for you. Changing in two years would imply a plan. I don’t think MLSN has a plan.

I thought it was silly to change. However, when 97% of the organizations decided to change, I assumed logistically, they would change.

There is going to be so much sorting on the field and “when were you born?” going on. If they would have just went full school year like everybody else, you can build in BY breaks like international breaks where you compile BY teams for play and potential U.S. national team preparing, etc.

It will just be interesting to see how this looks on the ground level. I don’t think they thought this through logistically.