Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Leveled classes would help so much for all students and teachers. Why MCPS won’t allow it is beyond me.
I was friends with an admin (not this district) who was responsible for making the classes and asked exactly what goes into it. She said "certain students are harder to teach, maybe for behavioral reasons or because theyre behind academically. So we want to make sure those students are divided evenly between the classes so no one teacher gets too many in their roster. The same with the easy kids, it wouldnt be fair if one teacher got a class of little angels who are advanced. It would be bad for everyone's morale."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And fyi the "we're so underpaid" is just false, I am sorry but it is. I don't think teachers are overpaid either. I think the compensation is well in line with those for other jobs requiring similar education (but no, it's not in line with inflated tech salaries - guess what you still have a job and thousands of them don't so joke's on them)
I’m a 2nd year teacher making 63k, and I work tons of overtime.
You think that’s paid well?
Um... yes! $63k is a great salary for a little over a year of experience and summers off.
This person has more than two years of experience (and maybe quite a bit more, depending on whether they have a master’s)—time in student teaching is not nothing.
Let’s say teachers are working 50 hr weeks (which I think is a conservative estimate) and adjust to 42 weeks a year factoring in summer.
This person is being paid $30 an hour. They do also get benefits (though they are substantially degraded from even a few years ago) and the weeks off for winter and spring breaks.
If you insist on factoring in those weeks as “time off” (as though salaried professionals in other field don’t also get leave they take mostly in these periods), it’s $32.30 an hour.
The problem is you think most people are making so much more, and they really aren't, especially straight out of grad school.
Btw there are about 260 work days in the year. Most full time salaried workers get 2-3 weeks of leave per year or 10-15 days. Meaning assuming they take those days, they are working for 245-250 days of the year for their contracted salary. You do the math about who has more work days before "overtime". Many salaried workers end up working nights and weekends.
No, I do not "think most people are making so much more."
I know that people with comparable education, and who we as a society trust with comparable responsibility--RNs, for example--make more.
More salaried professionals should join unions, but that is neither here nor there. I am a salaried professional and have not had fewer than four weeks of annual leave at any point in a 25-year career.
Crabs dragging one another back into a pot is no way to produce a thriving populace.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And fyi the "we're so underpaid" is just false, I am sorry but it is. I don't think teachers are overpaid either. I think the compensation is well in line with those for other jobs requiring similar education (but no, it's not in line with inflated tech salaries - guess what you still have a job and thousands of them don't so joke's on them)
I’m a 2nd year teacher making 63k, and I work tons of overtime.
You think that’s paid well?
Um... yes! $63k is a great salary for a little over a year of experience and summers off.
This person has more than two years of experience (and maybe quite a bit more, depending on whether they have a master’s)—time in student teaching is not nothing.
Let’s say teachers are working 50 hr weeks (which I think is a conservative estimate) and adjust to 42 weeks a year factoring in summer.
This person is being paid $30 an hour. They do also get benefits (though they are substantially degraded from even a few years ago) and the weeks off for winter and spring breaks.
If you insist on factoring in those weeks as “time off” (as though salaried professionals in other field don’t also get leave they take mostly in these periods), it’s $32.30 an hour.
The problem is you think most people are making so much more, and they really aren't, especially straight out of grad school.
Btw there are about 260 work days in the year. Most full time salaried workers get 2-3 weeks of leave per year or 10-15 days. Meaning assuming they take those days, they are working for 245-250 days of the year for their contracted salary. You do the math about who has more work days before "overtime". Many salaried workers end up working nights and weekends.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Okay, guys, please take the teacher compensation discussion to a different thread if you want to keep talking about it. If we have one or more elementary school teachers here willing to give candid responses to our questions, I think we should keep this thread focused on that.
OP here....
I'm still here and ready to give candid responses to questions!! Let me know.
Anonymous wrote: Thanks for serving as a sub! I don't get how you would not be hired permanently given that there is a teacher shortage, especially given your experience in MCPS. What needs to change about the hiring system?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And fyi the "we're so underpaid" is just false, I am sorry but it is. I don't think teachers are overpaid either. I think the compensation is well in line with those for other jobs requiring similar education (but no, it's not in line with inflated tech salaries - guess what you still have a job and thousands of them don't so joke's on them)
I’m a 2nd year teacher making 63k, and I work tons of overtime.
You think that’s paid well?
Um... yes! $63k is a great salary for a little over a year of experience and summers off.
Are you ten years old? Summers aren’t “off.” We aren’t paid. We have ten month contracts. Try and keep up.
Most salaried workers do not have the option to not work during the summer. We work or we lose our jobs.
If the unpaid summer is such a benefit to you, please consider switching professions. We need more teachers.
(Apparently those unpaid summers aren’t a big enough perk to keep many of us in the profession, but maybe it’s enough for you.)
+1. The bizarre thing about these conversations about teacher pay is that they're always theoretical and divorced from the reality of the fact that we don't have enough teachers. A salary and benefits are "great" if they attract enough people who want the job, not if someone who doesn't want the job thinks they sound great.
The fact that MCPS has so many experienced teachers suggests that they are staying because of the pay. The teacher shortage in Montgomery County (currently I see 174 vacant positions) is likely due to poor working conditions. Truly low paying jobs like childcare do not have the majority of staff working there over 15 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:And fyi the "we're so underpaid" is just false, I am sorry but it is. I don't think teachers are overpaid either. I think the compensation is well in line with those for other jobs requiring similar education (but no, it's not in line with inflated tech salaries - guess what you still have a job and thousands of them don't so joke's on them)
I’m a 2nd year teacher making 63k, and I work tons of overtime.
You think that’s paid well?
Um... yes! $63k is a great salary for a little over a year of experience and summers off.
Anonymous wrote:I’m quickly chiming in as a full-time substitute, at times, and I’ve observed that a lot of behavioral issues are indeed with boys, though they seem to be somewhat diminished when I’m there. (For context I’m male.) I think it’s a combination of issues at play, though I note with interest that the times I’ve had to contact parents about their son (or daughter) that sometimes I get a brush-off. (Or in extreme cases when the school wants to send them home, the parents refuse to pick them up, citing that their children are our problem.)
I have tried to get hired for full-time work with the district for years now, as I’m often able to engage and teach students, but it seems like schools like to hire internally, often people with no experience in that given field, and the turnover is more than it should be. Having said that, I am also not fluent in Spanish, and I regret that, as that would be even moreso helpful in reaching my students. So it goes.
With regards to the Boxlight, it’s just a replacement for the chalk board, as it were, no more, no less. The times I've done read-alouds, I’ve borrowed digital copies from the public library and move the pages with a presentation clicker. This allows all my students to see the pages blown up, rather than trying to show off a physical copy. I’m also able to walk around the room, making sure everyone is paying attention and not acting up.
The funny thing is that I’m old enough to remember taking computer classes in elementary school, on IBM PCjrs, learning BASIC, and getting fast on word processors and typewriters. And I distinctly recall, at the time, people saying that all that access to video games (Atari and later N64, for me) and even home computers was going to rot our brains. It’s a miracle anyone survived the 1980s and 1990s, if so. \s (When I went to college Netscape was just being adopted and then, oh boy, we had AOL, Geocities, and so much more. And card catalogs went the way of the dodo.)
So, I don’t think technology (or the amount of it) is necessarily the issue, so much as the implementation, as with anything with MCPS. So much is rolled out without proper integration with the curriculum or the right training to make it work best for the teacher and for the students.
Teachers are doing the best they can with what they have. There are just so many other variables at play that it’s hard to say that it’s just one or two that need to be tackled, rather than a basket full of them.
Anonymous wrote:Okay, guys, please take the teacher compensation discussion to a different thread if you want to keep talking about it. If we have one or more elementary school teachers here willing to give candid responses to our questions, I think we should keep this thread focused on that.
Anonymous wrote:The conversation about experienced teachers is ignoring that there is indeed a lot of turnover and transfers within the district, and that when push comes to shove a school will hire someone who may not be right or ready for the position, but that they need a warm body. All of which feeds into the turn-over cycle, as they get chewed up or burnt-out. There simply aren’t enough well-trained teachers currently in the system, and MCPS Careers does not quite reflect that reality, unfortunately.