Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In theory, if they sign, they need to eliminate tuition for anyone studying the “hard” sciences such as Math, Biology et al.
I think this means anything they deem as a difficult science though last I checked, Math isn’t a science at all.
Guess everyone will double major in Math even if you are just getting Cs.
That's only for Yale, Princeton, MIT, Stanford, and Harvard.
Huh?
Anonymous wrote:MAGA should get free tuition at **Liberty**
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:In theory, if they sign, they need to eliminate tuition for anyone studying the “hard” sciences such as Math, Biology et al.
I think this means anything they deem as a difficult science though last I checked, Math isn’t a science at all.
Guess everyone will double major in Math even if you are just getting Cs.
That's only for Yale, Princeton, MIT, Stanford, and Harvard.
Anonymous wrote:In theory, if they sign, they need to eliminate tuition for anyone studying the “hard” sciences such as Math, Biology et al.
I think this means anything they deem as a difficult science though last I checked, Math isn’t a science at all.
Guess everyone will double major in Math even if you are just getting Cs.
Anonymous wrote:The protection of "conservative" speech is concerning that it isn't traditional conservative viewpoints where it comes to policy that is at issue. It is the free expression of over racism and other -ism without reprucussion that is the problem. If there is a professor who is openly hostile to, say, asians, or blacks, and expression that opinion, why should students of those ethnicities feel safe or like they will get a fair shot in that class?
Anonymous wrote:This is the kind of micromanaging that makes people incessantly complain about their bosses. Why can't he focus on the big picture?
The president of the United States probably couldn't get over a 30% percentile SAT or ACT score, so HTH is he to tell colleges to rescind test-option.
Also, UO has no tuition increases for 5 years -- Go Ducks!
Anonymous wrote:Someone has stock in college board
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yeah, this is the part that everyone should be focusing on:
The compact asks universities to ensure a “vibrant marketplace of ideas on campus” and to bar employees from expressing political views on behalf of their employer, unless the matter affects the school. It seeks to create a more-welcoming environment for conservatives, asking colleges to make governance changes and abolish departments that “purposefully punish, belittle, and even spark violence against conservative ideas.”
Free and academic speech implications are awful.
I don’t see how you aren’t able to express your political views currently. It’s like the canonical tenure thing that you get grumpy and start critiquing your area study for being too progressive.
Also why can’t conservatives accept that they’re overwhelmingly career oriented minds aren’t compatible with a job that requires you to spend your first 6-7 years out of undergrad slaving 60-90 hours of work a week with $30-50k. I’m not convinced there are that many conservatives who would become professors, even if many of them could.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Shocked this page isn't lighting up with regard to UVA included. Following the "firing" of Jim Ryan this is a really slippery slope.
This page has been lighting up. This post is only a few hours old and it's a working day yet already hundreds of comments. This is big bad news for all parents and Americans IMO!