Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t sense the money for either side is the issue.
It’s the secrets and back channeling that obviously happened and continue to happen.
That also can lead to more cuts in the will, so “Early ButtKisser Gets the Worm.”
From OP’s original post:
“In one case she and my brother are now set to inherit 100% of everything. In the other case, she will get a hefty 6 figure “admin fee” and the rest will be donated.“
If it’s not about the money, then what are you implying about “buttkissing” and “worms”?
If it’s not about the money, how or why did SIL & Aunt change one will to exclude the only other niece?
If the brother and SIL are so caring and altruistic then they could have done everything above board: hey family update, we’re the executors and whatever’s left gets split 50/50 to heirs per the usual probate law.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t sense the money for either side is the issue.
It’s the secrets and back channeling that obviously happened and continue to happen.
That also can lead to more cuts in the will, so “Early ButtKisser Gets the Worm.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t sense the money for either side is the issue.
It’s the secrets and back channeling that obviously happened and continue to happen.
That also can lead to more cuts in the will, so “Early ButtKisser Gets the Worm.”
From OP’s original post:
“In one case she and my brother are now set to inherit 100% of everything. In the other case, she will get a hefty 6 figure “admin fee” and the rest will be donated.“
If it’s not about the money, then what are you implying about “buttkissing” and “worms”?
Anonymous wrote:I don’t sense the money for either side is the issue.
It’s the secrets and back channeling that obviously happened and continue to happen.
That also can lead to more cuts in the will, so “Early ButtKisser Gets the Worm.”
Anonymous wrote:Your brother is just as much to blame as his wife. He could have stopped her, but he didn't.
I'm sorry, OP. At least you can refuse to help this family with equanimity now that you know they will inherit a significant sum. Focus on your own life. The best revenge is living well!
PS: You could also inform your parents and explain that it's only fair that they compensate for this unfairness by weighing each of your inheritances accordingly. Depends what kind of parents they are.![]()
Anonymous wrote:These are aunts, not parents, and this is obviously not a close family. After receiving medical care for years, there might not be much left anyway. If you’re more concerned about how much money your childless elderly relatives are leaving you than how they are faring, don’t be surprised if they don’t follow your rules for inheritance. They can and should do what they like.Anonymous wrote:Wills that aren’t equitable amongst heirs will always cause issues.
Wills that aren’t equitable amongst heirs and kept a secret most definitely will.
Do you all know how many siblings or nieces no longer talk because of an inequitable will reveal!? Pretty many.
Some recipients go back and redistribute to keep the relationship, the ones who don’t keep the rift going.
Anonymous wrote:Serious eye roll to you, op. This is a “my brother” issue not a “my sil” issue.
Anonymous wrote:My brother and I are each married with kids, to our respective spouses, and live in various states away from our hometown. My spouse and I work, my brother’s wife does not.
I just found out that several years ago my brother’s wife secretly positioned herself as each of my 2 married childless aunt’s estate administrators. In one case she and my brother are now set to inherit 100% of everything. In the other case, she will get a hefty 6 figure “admin fee” and the rest will be donated.
The first set was having health issues and divorced; she swept in with emails, letters and feigned concerned and got an ill aunt to change things. The second set she pitched something and who knows what the will says now.
I guess my brother went along with it and never told anyone, even our parents or me.
The divorced uncle informed me recently as they moved. The other aunt told a family member who told me. Ironically I work in investing and with deal lawyers, estate attorneys and tax attorneys all the time.
I’m really disgusted by this all. The lack of communication, transparency and omissions.
Anonymous wrote:Always keep tabs on your sickly old relatives, always.
Also don’t let anyone from your family manage your property.
Two life lessons for me
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Recency bias is real OP. Forget the last 50 years, all that matters is the last few.
Unfortunately this ended up as a First Come, First Served situation and the relatives didn’t care that it was a spouse of a relative nor to ask around.
Bear in mind, the executioner of a will can, in reality, do whatever s/he wants with the house, money, art, vehicles, or even body. That’s the prize. That’s why an aunt would want the most truthworthy non-family member following the orders— surely an out of state schmoozing spouse of a nephew…
Sorry Op, you’ve all been had. That’s why it’s a secret.
Yeah, no! I’ve been the executor of two estates. I had to follow the wishes of the deceased as stated in the wills. I got 0% more than anyone else.
These are aunts, not parents, and this is obviously not a close family. After receiving medical care for years, there might not be much left anyway. If you’re more concerned about how much money your childless elderly relatives are leaving you than how they are faring, don’t be surprised if they don’t follow your rules for inheritance. They can and should do what they like.Anonymous wrote:Wills that aren’t equitable amongst heirs will always cause issues.
Wills that aren’t equitable amongst heirs and kept a secret most definitely will.
Do you all know how many siblings or nieces no longer talk because of an inequitable will reveal!? Pretty many.
Some recipients go back and redistribute to keep the relationship, the ones who don’t keep the rift going.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you call "schmoozing", unmarried aunts might call "company." Being elderly is lonely. Yes, it's nice that you've visited for all these years 1-2x a year, but if SIL calls once or twice a week every week and chats away with them....well, I'd leave her money, too. That's legitimately kind and thoughtful.
Is there a chance that they legitimately feel closer to her than to you or your brother?
I would hope that if I decided to do something stupid by arbitrarily disinheriting some family members, a close friend or family member would discuss the matter with me and make sure I'm aware of the consequences. If I have good reasons, that's fine and can be elucidated in such a conversation. Sometimes we all need a gentle reminder to reconsider our actions.
This doesn’t seem like it was arbitrary.
Aunt sick and dying in the hospital changing her will to a wife of a nephew!?! lol.
Then hospital divorce was probably mainly to not bankrupt the healthy spouse and get on Medicaid and free hospice asap.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What you call "schmoozing", unmarried aunts might call "company." Being elderly is lonely. Yes, it's nice that you've visited for all these years 1-2x a year, but if SIL calls once or twice a week every week and chats away with them....well, I'd leave her money, too. That's legitimately kind and thoughtful.
Is there a chance that they legitimately feel closer to her than to you or your brother?
I would hope that if I decided to do something stupid by arbitrarily disinheriting some family members, a close friend or family member would discuss the matter with me and make sure I'm aware of the consequences. If I have good reasons, that's fine and can be elucidated in such a conversation. Sometimes we all need a gentle reminder to reconsider our actions.