Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:US scouts at ECNL playoff matches as well.
ECNL league matches
Anonymous wrote:US scouts at ECNL playoff matches as well.
Anonymous wrote:US scouts at ECNL playoff matches as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is it not true that only 2012 age group is by coaches recommendation but 2011 is based on actual scouting done at games and or tournaments? If FVU didn't send any names in for 2011 would it have mattered? If scouts were looking at the team at any point last year and thought girls were good enough would their names be on the list?
No one is actually going to tournaments to "scout" lol
What an embarrassing take. They are certainly there. Maybe not for your DDs team, but they are there at important tourneys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is it not true that only 2012 age group is by coaches recommendation but 2011 is based on actual scouting done at games and or tournaments? If FVU didn't send any names in for 2011 would it have mattered? If scouts were looking at the team at any point last year and thought girls were good enough would their names be on the list?
No one is actually going to tournaments to "scout" lol
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So is it not true that only 2012 age group is by coaches recommendation but 2011 is based on actual scouting done at games and or tournaments? If FVU didn't send any names in for 2011 would it have mattered? If scouts were looking at the team at any point last year and thought girls were good enough would their names be on the list?
No one is actually going to tournaments to "scout" lol
Anonymous wrote:So is it not true that only 2012 age group is by coaches recommendation but 2011 is based on actual scouting done at games and or tournaments? If FVU didn't send any names in for 2011 would it have mattered? If scouts were looking at the team at any point last year and thought girls were good enough would their names be on the list?
supposedly working some follow on angles. But now has to appease a tough crowd looking through a microscope. Before that crowd was pretty chillax. Also no one wants to be invited to the ball late. Impossible to fix and appease imo.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the other thread about FVU - CW will get the girls added to the session so that works out for them.
FVU parents. So gullible.
Hopefully CW did fix it for them. But like the other PP said - if they were to add FVU, then Richmond and Beach could be added too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the other thread about FVU - CW will get the girls added to the session so that works out for them.
FVU parents. So gullible.
Anonymous wrote:On the other thread about FVU - CW will get the girls added to the session so that works out for them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:On the other thread about FVU - CW will get the girls added to the session so that works out for them.
This. FVU ADMITTED it screwed up to families. This is not a question.
And no basis for the assertion that “CW will get it fixed.”