Anonymous wrote:https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1007838.page

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's frustrating about this thread is that the person harping on locker room exhibition is allowed to keep posting but any mentions of the two recent and nearby events where people exploited the policy to cause hard keep getting deleted. I did report them, we'll see if it gets removed.

The sex offender incident has brought about a change in the process - showing ID.

The exhibitionists are still there *constantly*. It’s an ongoing issue.

Wow, it got removed so quickly! That has nothing to do with the case in LCPS and someone who is not a registered sex offender (yet) could still say "Yeah, I'm female" and get in.

The LCPS case isn’t relevant for multiple reasons that Jeff himself has spelled out on prior threads.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's frustrating about this thread is that the person harping on locker room exhibition is allowed to keep posting but any mentions of the two recent and nearby events where people exploited the policy to cause hard keep getting deleted. I did report them, we'll see if it gets removed.

The sex offender incident has brought about a change in the process - showing ID.

The exhibitionists are still there *constantly*. It’s an ongoing issue.

Wow, it got removed so quickly! That has nothing to do with the case in LCPS and someone who is not a registered sex offender (yet) could still say "Yeah, I'm female" and get in.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What's frustrating about this thread is that the person harping on locker room exhibition is allowed to keep posting but any mentions of the two recent and nearby events where people exploited the policy to cause hard keep getting deleted. I did report them, we'll see if it gets removed.

The sex offender incident has brought about a change in the process - showing ID.

The exhibitionists are still there *constantly*. It’s an ongoing issue.

Anonymous wrote:What's frustrating about this thread is that the person harping on locker room exhibition is allowed to keep posting but any mentions of the two recent and nearby events where people exploited the policy to cause hard keep getting deleted. I did report them, we'll see if it gets removed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I doubt any of the anti trans posters have even been in a high school recently. 90% of kids don’t change where I teach anymore, they just wear comfy clothes to school and throw on sneakers. Locker rooms aren’t a huge deal. Certainly no showers or naked displays.

Bathrooms are behind a stall door so again, not sure what anyone thinks they’ll see.

If you’re truly worried about sex offenders in locker rooms and bathrooms, not trans children, let’s brainstorm ways to stop that.

EXACTLY.

That Arlington predator wasn't allowed in either bathroom.

My two APS teens have never changed in an open locker room, either for gym or varsity sports.

The only naked people I've seen in locker rooms in the last decade are older ladies at the pool who are creepy exhibitionists.

It is interesting how the sexism, misogyny, and ageism of trans activists always seeps out. They can’t keep it in, for whatever reason. It is just a core part of who they are, I guess.

I think this is part of the reason a lot of trans rights issues have become approximately 90/10 issues (including Gen Z).

It’s odd how the schools are taking such an unprincipled and unpopular stance. They could compromise (create a safe third space for trans kids, address sports on a case by case basis, etc) but they are so determined to fight for the rights of misogynists that they can’t back down.

I’m a Millennial who has noted for years (well before the current GOP trans panic) that the only people parading around locker rooms nude are old ladies, and when I say parade, I mean parade. As in, awkward changing my 3 year old in there parade. Blow drying the hair, applying the makeup, reorganizing the gym bag, and shooting the breeze completely nude. From what my husband told me, it’s the same in the men’s room.

If it’s ageist and sexist to speak the truth, I’m guilty as charged. Now put some clothes on, there are kids present.

I hope you don’t have daughters. They deserve better than to be taught by someone who actively despises women as deeply as you do. It’s so sad to watch. I’d suggest therapy, but I think your self-loathing goes too deep for that.

There is nothing misogynistic about not wanting pervy old women strutting around the locker room buck naked because they have some kind of exhibitionism fetish.

Wow. You are profoundly messed up.

I’m not the exhibitionist making everyone else uncomfortable in the locker room with my fetish.

So incredibly messed up. My God.

Yes, no one should be lingering buck naked for long periods of time in the locker room. Their exhibitionism makes everyone uncomfortable. No one should be blogging about naked kids dancing around the locker room either - so creepy.

Honey, a word of advice. Stop digging. You are only sounding weirder and more insane with each post. This is actually exemplary of a serious issue for trans rights: a lot of their loudest activists come across as raging lunatics. I don’t think anyone normal objects to a few private separate bathrooms for trans kids, but you sound so weird and deranged that you make people question everything.

And nobody normal buys your absolutely bizarre fantasies here. You are talking about something that exists solely in your absolutely creepy imagination. Just stop it. You are making things worse for your cause, not better.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wait? NCAA has tracked back but APS and FCPS haven’t?

“The school division policies allow students of the opposite sex access to sex-separated facilities. They also allow students of the opposite sex to participate in sex-separated sports.“

I guess I’ll start looking at single sex private schools for high school. I thought we realized that very few people want this, and it’s unfair to women.

Please go say this under your real name. Own it if you really think this is right. If you just stay anonymous you must know on some level how hateful your views are.

I am not the PP, but this type of response is why the MAGA types keep winning elections. There needs to be space under the Democratic tent for those of us who feel that trans men competing in women’s sports is deeply unfair to female athletes. It’s not a clear cut issue by any stretch of the imagination. Just look at what happened with Lia Thomas at UPenn three years ago and how that impacted top women swimmers who had dedicated their life to their sport.

Anonymous wrote:
If Loudoun County loses all state and federal funding due to non-compliance, the total loss could be around 32.5% of its budget, or roughly $1.5275 billion.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I doubt any of the anti trans posters have even been in a high school recently. 90% of kids don’t change where I teach anymore, they just wear comfy clothes to school and throw on sneakers. Locker rooms aren’t a huge deal. Certainly no showers or naked displays.

Bathrooms are behind a stall door so again, not sure what anyone thinks they’ll see.

If you’re truly worried about sex offenders in locker rooms and bathrooms, not trans children, let’s brainstorm ways to stop that.

EXACTLY.

That Arlington predator wasn't allowed in either bathroom.

My two APS teens have never changed in an open locker room, either for gym or varsity sports.

The only naked people I've seen in locker rooms in the last decade are older ladies at the pool who are creepy exhibitionists.

It is interesting how the sexism, misogyny, and ageism of trans activists always seeps out. They can’t keep it in, for whatever reason. It is just a core part of who they are, I guess.

I think this is part of the reason a lot of trans rights issues have become approximately 90/10 issues (including Gen Z).

It’s odd how the schools are taking such an unprincipled and unpopular stance. They could compromise (create a safe third space for trans kids, address sports on a case by case basis, etc) but they are so determined to fight for the rights of misogynists that they can’t back down.

I’m a Millennial who has noted for years (well before the current GOP trans panic) that the only people parading around locker rooms nude are old ladies, and when I say parade, I mean parade. As in, awkward changing my 3 year old in there parade. Blow drying the hair, applying the makeup, reorganizing the gym bag, and shooting the breeze completely nude. From what my husband told me, it’s the same in the men’s room.

If it’s ageist and sexist to speak the truth, I’m guilty as charged. Now put some clothes on, there are kids present.

I hope you don’t have daughters. They deserve better than to be taught by someone who actively despises women as deeply as you do. It’s so sad to watch. I’d suggest therapy, but I think your self-loathing goes too deep for that.

There is nothing misogynistic about not wanting pervy old women strutting around the locker room buck naked because they have some kind of exhibitionism fetish.

Wow. You are profoundly messed up.

I’m not the exhibitionist making everyone else uncomfortable in the locker room with my fetish.

So incredibly messed up. My God.

Yes, no one should be lingering buck naked for long periods of time in the locker room. Their exhibitionism makes everyone uncomfortable. No one should be blogging about naked kids dancing around the locker room either - so creepy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I doubt any of the anti trans posters have even been in a high school recently. 90% of kids don’t change where I teach anymore, they just wear comfy clothes to school and throw on sneakers. Locker rooms aren’t a huge deal. Certainly no showers or naked displays.

Bathrooms are behind a stall door so again, not sure what anyone thinks they’ll see.

If you’re truly worried about sex offenders in locker rooms and bathrooms, not trans children, let’s brainstorm ways to stop that.

EXACTLY.

That Arlington predator wasn't allowed in either bathroom.

My two APS teens have never changed in an open locker room, either for gym or varsity sports.

The only naked people I've seen in locker rooms in the last decade are older ladies at the pool who are creepy exhibitionists.

It is interesting how the sexism, misogyny, and ageism of trans activists always seeps out. They can’t keep it in, for whatever reason. It is just a core part of who they are, I guess.

I think this is part of the reason a lot of trans rights issues have become approximately 90/10 issues (including Gen Z).

It’s odd how the schools are taking such an unprincipled and unpopular stance. They could compromise (create a safe third space for trans kids, address sports on a case by case basis, etc) but they are so determined to fight for the rights of misogynists that they can’t back down.

I’m a Millennial who has noted for years (well before the current GOP trans panic) that the only people parading around locker rooms nude are old ladies, and when I say parade, I mean parade. As in, awkward changing my 3 year old in there parade. Blow drying the hair, applying the makeup, reorganizing the gym bag, and shooting the breeze completely nude. From what my husband told me, it’s the same in the men’s room.

If it’s ageist and sexist to speak the truth, I’m guilty as charged. Now put some clothes on, there are kids present.

I hope you don’t have daughters. They deserve better than to be taught by someone who actively despises women as deeply as you do. It’s so sad to watch. I’d suggest therapy, but I think your self-loathing goes too deep for that.

There is nothing misogynistic about not wanting pervy old women strutting around the locker room buck naked because they have some kind of exhibitionism fetish.

Wow. You are profoundly messed up.

I’m not the exhibitionist making everyone else uncomfortable in the locker room with my fetish.

So incredibly messed up. My God.

Anonymous wrote:Anyone here a lawyer that has an opinion worth hearing? Do these districts stand a chance in court?

Anonymous wrote:
If Loudoun County loses all state and federal funding due to non-compliance, the total loss could be around 32.5% of its budget, or roughly $1.5275 billion.

Anonymous wrote:Can we instead focus on the fact that our schools are going to lose some of their funding. what is the plan for replacing this funding or cutting costs? Or did the school boards do this without a plan, which would be a disservice to all students (trans or cis).