Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the point of driving a Mercedes when the Hyundai gets you the same place?
The actual cost of these cars is not as different as you think, and the main function is the same.
You are paying $40K more to cover luxury premium which means a lot of advertising, better grades of leather and plastic, and some showy stuff like color-changing light pipes that run all around the cabin and extra big display screens.
The quality and reliability could easily be the same.
Some would say you're paying $40K for nothing.
Anonymous wrote:What’s the point of driving a Mercedes when the Hyundai gets you the same place?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If you go to the ER you will see car crash survivors who wore a seat belt and, also, some who did not. Does it matter whether you wear a seat belt if you end up in the same place?
Not a good analogy. You can end up with the ER with permanent life-threatening injuries, or ones that are serious but fully recoverable. Wearing seat belts has a causal effect on the relatively likelihood of each.,
Going to a better school puts you in the company of people who understand analogies.
The SAT stopped testing analogies in 2005.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a troll. I’m the parent of a HS sophomore who is killing themselves excelling in school and participating in extracurriculars to be competitive for T20.
At the same time, I see parents on here posting how their kid went to Cornell and ended up in the same place as someone who went to Pitt or another similarly ranked school.
At the same time, in my job I work alongside people who have gone to ivies and schools I’ve never heard of. I went to Michigan, btw.
My sister did her undergraduate at Oxford, stayed in the UK and is now partner at a well respected consulting firm alongside other partners that went to no name schools from India.
So seeing the stress my kid goes through, I am honestly asking what is the point of a Yale or Princeton if they take you to the same place that a school like Rutgers and Radford can take you?!
No offense, you’re exposing how small-minded and dumb you are coming from 50,000-student degree mill Michigan. You don’t realize you’re “working with” a handful of Ivy alums who were probably in the bottom of their classes. You also apparently don’t realize what a truly powerful tightknit alumni network and dating pool are. To be clear, a powerful alum network is not “our degree mill alumni network is so big there are grads everywhere!” But I know that’s what your kind thinks.![]()
Anonymous wrote:OP, I’ll bet my story angers you. How very dare a C average, RU graduate end up with a fabulous, lucrative career in a happy marriage.
Anonymous wrote:Dude, if you have the means to pay for the "IVY" without debt, you are already a step away from home plate, or maybe you already own the ball field. It REALLY doesn't matter where you go to college at that point.
Anonymous wrote:If you have the means to pay for the IVY with out debt it will always be worth it.
Say you go to medical school and you are Harvard, Yale, etc trained. And you decide to make a career move or say you work for the government and opt to go back in to private practice. The Harvard trained doctor is always going to be given a leg up vs. the doctor from another school.
If you’re smart enough to be educated at an IVY you stand above the others. Even if only on paper. It opens doors.
It provides the ability to meet and marry a spouse who will be at an earning level well above others.
Membership has its benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your alumni network is different. Your potential pool of SOs/life partners is different. Your enjoyment of the learning may be different.
I never understand this comment. The median age for college educated people to get married these days is 30 (and even higher among those with advanced degrees). The odds these days that you are meeting a life partner in college are low.
Cream of the crop marry in their 20s. The leftovers scrabble in their 30s to marry what’s left.
I agree with this! It was true when I was in college 30 years ago and it's true now. I see it amongst my staff - most have PhDs, some MS in STEM field. The Ines that come in married are just.....better.... better looking, better background, smarter, etc.....the ones that go on the hunt until their 30s usually have some social-emotional issues. I know it's an unpopular idea, but it's true.
Now the ones that get married in their late teens or early 20s are different still. These are usually primed for a life of instability.
Mid to late 20s is optimal.
Anonymous wrote:If you have the means to pay for the IVY with out debt it will always be worth it.
Say you go to medical school and you are Harvard, Yale, etc trained. And you decide to make a career move or say you work for the government and opt to go back in to private practice. The Harvard trained doctor is always going to be given a leg up vs. the doctor from another school.
If you’re smart enough to be educated at an IVY you stand above the others. Even if only on paper. It opens doors.
It provides the ability to meet and marry a spouse who will be at an earning level well above others.
Membership has its benefits.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If your kid wants to be an academia, it likely does not matter either since graduate school is more dispositive.
Graduate schools see a 4.0 from non-flagship state school applicants the same as a 4.0 from HYPSM?
Anonymous wrote:If you can afford a particular college and your DC likes it, go for it. But if you're shopping for future friends or worse, a spous, at particular colleges, my condolences to your future generations for having shallow, low-quality ancestors.