Anonymous wrote:Imagine if Mexico decided they want to help poor people in Herndon Virginia
And they sent smart people from their “Ivy League” schools to build schools and build relationships and to provide support to people in Herndon .
How much of that money would reach the people that actually need it?
None , because the educated people from Mexico would interact with the educated people from Herndon , and most of the resources wills be siphoned off by the educated people of Herndon
State is a relic from a past gone era . It should be cut in half this year and do another 50% cuts next year.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
Morale is normally a 2 at State without a RIF.
This and that is the point of everything they are doing. Keep the good ones and bring in fresh in a bit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
Morale is normally a 2 at State without a RIF.
This and that is the point of everything they are doing. Keep the good ones and bring in fresh in a bit.
Nope nope nope. It was all a political stunt. They RIFd.good people. They RIFd people working on mission critical work. They RIFd good people working on mission critical work. Whoever made the decisions should be the one fired because there was clearly little actual strategy behind it. My office did not have any RIFs but morale still has gone from an 8 to maybe a 1.
Anonymous wrote:60 days for civil service. Foreign service get 120.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
What consequences do you think Marco Rubio faces if Department morale is low? Do you think that gets him in trouble with his boss?
I see you’ve never managed anyone. You are asking what consequences someone faces when their entire workforce has rock bottom morale? Ok, I’ll answer. Low morale leads to lower performance. I’ve never seen an administration (other than Trump 1 and 2) walk into the WH disparaging their employees, openly hostile to their staff (who has been working since Election Day to find ways their agencies’ mission promotes their new boss’ priorities). Feds are professionals and look past that to do their jobs. It is so strange to meet with political appointees for the first time and see the open hostility and complete distrust of people they’ve never met, of people whose entire careers are have been constant adjusting to changing policy priorities of either party. I was a fed but left during Trump 1, not because of politics.
Lower performance is what they want. They want an excuse to fire more people. What aren’t you understanding here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
Morale is normally a 2 at State without a RIF.
This and that is the point of everything they are doing. Keep the good ones and bring in fresh in a bit.
Nope nope nope. It was all a political stunt. They RIFd.good people. They RIFd people working on mission critical work. They RIFd good people working on mission critical work. Whoever made the decisions should be the one fired because there was clearly little actual strategy behind it. My office did not have any RIFs but morale still has gone from an 8 to maybe a 1.
Well, pretentiousness has dropped from a 10 to a 2.
Sorry you never could pass that darn FSOT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
What consequences do you think Marco Rubio faces if Department morale is low? Do you think that gets him in trouble with his boss?
I see you’ve never managed anyone. You are asking what consequences someone faces when their entire workforce has rock bottom morale? Ok, I’ll answer. Low morale leads to lower performance. I’ve never seen an administration (other than Trump 1 and 2) walk into the WH disparaging their employees, openly hostile to their staff (who has been working since Election Day to find ways their agencies’ mission promotes their new boss’ priorities). Feds are professionals and look past that to do their jobs. It is so strange to meet with political appointees for the first time and see the open hostility and complete distrust of people they’ve never met, of people whose entire careers are have been constant adjusting to changing policy priorities of either party. I was a fed but left during Trump 1, not because of politics.
Lower performance is what they want. They want an excuse to fire more people. What aren’t you understanding here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
What consequences do you think Marco Rubio faces if Department morale is low? Do you think that gets him in trouble with his boss?
I see you’ve never managed anyone. You are asking what consequences someone faces when their entire workforce has rock bottom morale? Ok, I’ll answer. Low morale leads to lower performance. I’ve never seen an administration (other than Trump 1 and 2) walk into the WH disparaging their employees, openly hostile to their staff (who has been working since Election Day to find ways their agencies’ mission promotes their new boss’ priorities). Feds are professionals and look past that to do their jobs. It is so strange to meet with political appointees for the first time and see the open hostility and complete distrust of people they’ve never met, of people whose entire careers are have been constant adjusting to changing policy priorities of either party. I was a fed but left during Trump 1, not because of politics.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
Morale is normally a 2 at State without a RIF.
This and that is the point of everything they are doing. Keep the good ones and bring in fresh in a bit.
Nope nope nope. It was all a political stunt. They RIFd.good people. They RIFd people working on mission critical work. They RIFd good people working on mission critical work. Whoever made the decisions should be the one fired because there was clearly little actual strategy behind it. My office did not have any RIFs but morale still has gone from an 8 to maybe a 1.
Well, pretentiousness has dropped from a 10 to a 2.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
Morale is normally a 2 at State without a RIF.
This and that is the point of everything they are doing. Keep the good ones and bring in fresh in a bit.
Nope nope nope. It was all a political stunt. They RIFd.good people. They RIFd people working on mission critical work. They RIFd good people working on mission critical work. Whoever made the decisions should be the one fired because there was clearly little actual strategy behind it. My office did not have any RIFs but morale still has gone from an 8 to maybe a 1.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
What consequences do you think Marco Rubio faces if Department morale is low? Do you think that gets him in trouble with his boss?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.
What consequences do you think Marco Rubio faces if Department morale is low? Do you think that gets him in trouble with his boss?
Anonymous wrote:Agency-wide morale is at maybe a 2 out of 10. Marco better get it together or it will drop further. Clearly, the A Team isn’t running things for sure.