Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Surgeon.

AI-driven robots will soon take over all surgeries and perform better than humans.

This isn’t true for a variety of reasons.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eye surgeon here - robotic surgery is on the horizon. In studies, robot is more precise than human (margin of error is 1 micron) and 100% success rate. Technology not quite there yet but it’s coming faster than we think.

AI can takeover a lot of human facing jobs… but many people will still want a human… for a while anyway. Eventually, more people will get used to interacting with AI.

Teacher? Yes all knowledge is available online but to learn from that on your own requires a very self-motivated kid.

Pathologist here.
As long as there are lawyers, I am not worried about being replaced by AI.

Do A.I. lawyers count? Because law and the legal realm is one of the main areas that A.I. will take over, as it's a perfect field for the tech.

Who ends up carrying the malpractice insurance?

A.I. corporate owners?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eye surgeon here - robotic surgery is on the horizon. In studies, robot is more precise than human (margin of error is 1 micron) and 100% success rate. Technology not quite there yet but it’s coming faster than we think.

AI can takeover a lot of human facing jobs… but many people will still want a human… for a while anyway. Eventually, more people will get used to interacting with AI.

Teacher? Yes all knowledge is available online but to learn from that on your own requires a very self-motivated kid.

Pathologist here.
As long as there are lawyers, I am not worried about being replaced by AI.

Do A.I. lawyers count? Because law and the legal realm is one of the main areas that A.I. will take over, as it's a perfect field for the tech.

Who ends up carrying the malpractice insurance?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eye surgeon here - robotic surgery is on the horizon. In studies, robot is more precise than human (margin of error is 1 micron) and 100% success rate. Technology not quite there yet but it’s coming faster than we think.

AI can takeover a lot of human facing jobs… but many people will still want a human… for a while anyway. Eventually, more people will get used to interacting with AI.

Teacher? Yes all knowledge is available online but to learn from that on your own requires a very self-motivated kid.

Pathologist here.
As long as there are lawyers, I am not worried about being replaced by AI.

There is already AI assist in pathology. It is in routine use in Europe where there is a critical shortage of pathologists for limited but high volume indications (ie prostate biopsies), but is not routinely used in the US. However, the companies will not accept legal responsibility for mistakes.

Also, my colleagues in Germany tell me that AI makes serious mistakes. Our lab uses AI as an assist for reading bone aspirates, and the system routinely just misses plasma cell myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia with differentiation, misclassifying or refusing to classify the abnormal cells.

So AI has a long way to go, and I think that there will always be human oversight of medical decision making/ procedures done by AI because otherwise there will be no one to sue for bad outcomes.

In the United States people are entities in excel spreadsheets with monetary value attached to them. Trust me investors dgaf of AI makes these critical mistakes they are trying hard to push these imperfect system because they are greedy. Heck they will take the misdiagnosis if it personality affected them in exchange for a few millions. The greed of Americans is truly incredible

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Eye surgeon here - robotic surgery is on the horizon. In studies, robot is more precise than human (margin of error is 1 micron) and 100% success rate. Technology not quite there yet but it’s coming faster than we think.

AI can takeover a lot of human facing jobs… but many people will still want a human… for a while anyway. Eventually, more people will get used to interacting with AI.

Teacher? Yes all knowledge is available online but to learn from that on your own requires a very self-motivated kid.

Pathologist here.
As long as there are lawyers, I am not worried about being replaced by AI.

Do A.I. lawyers count? Because law and the legal realm is one of the main areas that A.I. will take over, as it's a perfect field for the tech.

Anonymous wrote:Eye surgeon here - robotic surgery is on the horizon. In studies, robot is more precise than human (margin of error is 1 micron) and 100% success rate. Technology not quite there yet but it’s coming faster than we think.

AI can takeover a lot of human facing jobs… but many people will still want a human… for a while anyway. Eventually, more people will get used to interacting with AI.

Teacher? Yes all knowledge is available online but to learn from that on your own requires a very self-motivated kid.

Pathologist here.
As long as there are lawyers, I am not worried about being replaced by AI.

There is already AI assist in pathology. It is in routine use in Europe where there is a critical shortage of pathologists for limited but high volume indications (ie prostate biopsies), but is not routinely used in the US. However, the companies will not accept legal responsibility for mistakes.

Also, my colleagues in Germany tell me that AI makes serious mistakes. Our lab uses AI as an assist for reading bone aspirates, and the system routinely just misses plasma cell myeloma and acute myeloid leukemia with differentiation, misclassifying or refusing to classify the abnormal cells.

So AI has a long way to go, and I think that there will always be human oversight of medical decision making/ procedures done by AI because otherwise there will be no one to sue for bad outcomes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:There will actually be a fall of AI. The data will be misrepresented, full of mistakes, built on synthetic data, data quality will wane, and jobs will be needed to eliminate this bias and faulty information.

Sounds like a job made for an AI.

A.I. policing itself. What could go wrong.

Anonymous wrote:There will actually be a fall of AI. The data will be misrepresented, full of mistakes, built on synthetic data, data quality will wane, and jobs will be needed to eliminate this bias and faulty information.

That makes no sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DD is 16 and is thinking about possible future careers. She is super stressed out about AI taking over her job and we are having a hard time thinking of some safer jobs.

She wants to work with her mind rather than her body (so no blue collar) and is not interested in medicine.

Psychologist

AI computer could review millions of cases of data in a microsecond and monitor vital signs during a session, similar to an advanced lie detector, to give better therapy than any human, even a team of thousands of psychiatrists/psychologists, could give.

I would not trust AI for mental health, which requires empathy, reading one's body language. AI cannot think like a human.

I wouldn't pay someone hundreds an hour for "feelings". You want facts and scientific analysis, not a shoulder to cry on.
AI will do much better in that field than any human ever could.

Tell me you've never been to therapy LOLOLOLOLOL

Most people don't need "therapy", unless you are talking about massage therapy then it's good!

Anonymous wrote:There will actually be a fall of AI. The data will be misrepresented, full of mistakes, built on synthetic data, data quality will wane, and jobs will be needed to eliminate this bias and faulty information.

Sounds like a job made for an AI.

Anonymous wrote:There will actually be a fall of AI. The data will be misrepresented, full of mistakes, built on synthetic data, data quality will wane, and jobs will be needed to eliminate this bias and faulty information.

This. AI sucks and is often wrong.

There will actually be a fall of AI. The data will be misrepresented, full of mistakes, built on synthetic data, data quality will wane, and jobs will be needed to eliminate this bias and faulty information.

Anonymous wrote:I hate the kiosk. When able, I bypass the kiosk and go up to the counter to order.

LOL when I pull up to McDonald's drive-thru (happens rarely) and they ask if I can order through the app. LOL no.

The app is great if you go more often. Quick to reorder things and the rewards are actually good. Not like Starbucks which has a terrible app and rewards program.

Gen Xers may not want AI therapy but the truth younger generations interface with technology more seamlessly.

The speed at which AI is advancing now is exponential. We are at the inflection point, now moving past the slow build up.

It’s not just AI - it’s also robotics. Not even doctors/surgeons will be spared. Some maybe. All- no.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:DD is 16 and is thinking about possible future careers. She is super stressed out about AI taking over her job and we are having a hard time thinking of some safer jobs.

She wants to work with her mind rather than her body (so no blue collar) and is not interested in medicine.

Psychologist

AI computer could review millions of cases of data in a microsecond and monitor vital signs during a session, similar to an advanced lie detector, to give better therapy than any human, even a team of thousands of psychiatrists/psychologists, could give.

I would not trust AI for mental health, which requires empathy, reading one's body language. AI cannot think like a human.

I wouldn't pay someone hundreds an hour for "feelings". You want facts and scientific analysis, not a shoulder to cry on.
AI will do much better in that field than any human ever could.

Tell me you've never been to therapy LOLOLOLOLOL