Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the latest in RIF for us?
I’ve heard that they are cutting entire departments.
Please give more details
Who is getting rif’d Fannie or Freddie? And yes more details who did you hear this from.
False rumors
No!
https://themortgagepoint.com/2025/04/01/democratic-sens-push-back-against-fhfa-director/
I didn’t see anything about rifs
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the latest in RIF for us?
I’ve heard that they are cutting entire departments.
Please give more details
Who is getting rif’d Fannie or Freddie? And yes more details who did you hear this from.
False rumors
No!
https://themortgagepoint.com/2025/04/01/democratic-sens-push-back-against-fhfa-director/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the latest in RIF for us?
I’ve heard that they are cutting entire departments.
Please give more details
Who is getting rif’d Fannie or Freddie? And yes more details who did you hear this from.
False rumors
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the latest in RIF for us?
I’ve heard that they are cutting entire departments.
Please give more details
Who is getting rif’d Fannie or Freddie? And yes more details who did you hear this from.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the latest in RIF for us?
I’ve heard that they are cutting entire departments.
Please give more details
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What’s the latest in RIF for us?
I’ve heard that they are cutting entire departments.
Anonymous wrote:What’s the latest in RIF for us?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are the lawyers at the GSE’s at risk?
In a merger situation, so obviously! The streamlining effort that is going on in government will hit Fannie+Freddie. I think many departments that do similar/same work is at risk. It's unique roles and who is more liked that works in favor of an employee during reorgs like this.
There are no plans to merge Freddie and Fannie. This is fake news.
However, privatization is on the table.
Trump intends to use Fannie/Freddie as collateral for his SWF. (Been covered extensively if you read something other than NBC or CNN.) You explain to me how that will work if it's private. This Administration isn't about to turn away money-making machines by making them "private" when there are other ways to use them for the benefits of their idiotic ideas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are the lawyers at the GSE’s at risk?
In a merger situation, so obviously! The streamlining effort that is going on in government will hit Fannie+Freddie. I think many departments that do similar/same work is at risk. It's unique roles and who is more liked that works in favor of an employee during reorgs like this.
There are no plans to merge Freddie and Fannie. This is fake news.
However, privatization is on the table.
Still can centralize functions
They’re two separate companies who are competitors. Why would they do that?
Why do we need competing companies (with many 7 figure earners each) to support the mortgage market? Cant we have one that is more streamlined? Both of these companies are extremely inefficient but without them the mortgage market fails. Its a waste of $$$.
Tell Congress? they were both chartered by Congress.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Are the lawyers at the GSE’s at risk?
In a merger situation, so obviously! The streamlining effort that is going on in government will hit Fannie+Freddie. I think many departments that do similar/same work is at risk. It's unique roles and who is more liked that works in favor of an employee during reorgs like this.
There are no plans to merge Freddie and Fannie. This is fake news.
However, privatization is on the table.
Anonymous wrote:I’m just trying to figure out if she was let go just because of who she was or because she tried to stand up to something?