Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For local norms, does anyone know if they are based on base school or school attended (for immersion or other magnet/lottery schools)? I know "in pool" doesn't actually impact chances, just another referral pathway. Just curious if anyone knows what "local" means in this case.
How do you know it doesn’t impact chances? I’ve seen somewhere that in pool acceptance rate is roughly 2/3 while out pool is 1/3. I am unable to provide any sources so who knows how much of this is true, but if it is wouldn’t that mean better chance of app when in pool?
This has been discussed quite a bit on this forum. Just having the label "in-pool" does not matter. However, what does matter is that this means the child's COGAT and NNAT scores are high. The AAP committee will look at the whole package, and having high COGAT/NNAT scores will be a point in their favor for sure.
Sure, although surely the committee is aware of the kind of prepping that goes on in some corners and for those with near perfect scores they might more critically evaluate the whole packet. But that's just arm-chair speculation.
I think that's true for packages that show big gaps between nnat/cogat and other criteria (HOPE, iready, score card). I also think it's odd that people think of prepping in a negative light. From my point of view, prepping means the parents are more involved and invested in the kids education. It's not like they cheat or anything during those tests. Plus, kids are prepped on all kinds of tests in school, starting with SOL in 3rd garde.
It's not odd at all and we probably don't need to rehash this conversation as it's well trodden territory in this forum. There are parents who essentially sign their kids up for courses to prepare for the CogAT. As in many, many hours of instruction and practice led by outside individuals on how to ace the test. This isn't the same as getting a book and helping the child get familiar with the test format. And FCPS is well aware, hence the increasingly "holistic" process intended to address the inequity this presents.
This really is not the norm. We live in McLean and most parents probably get a cogat book off amazon and take a few practice tests. This is not going to move a 100 kid to 140.
Yes, I didn't even know there were courses for CogAT prep, but I have purchased books and other tools, and I don't see any problem with that. We live in a low SES area but are not in a URM group. I guess that "helps" my kid because the in pool cutoffs could be lower. Given the poor quality of education in gen ed, who wouldn't try to get their children the best possible education the family can afford?
I also don't see a problem with that, and I'm not trying to imply that this level of prep is a widespread norm, but there is a substantial group of parents that do a lot more than go through a few practice books. Look up Sunshine Academy. They even do i-ready prep. Here are more details to show there clearly is a demand for this as they have multiple saturday sections:
"All 2nd graders in Fairfax County will take the CogAT(FxAT) test in the coming fall. To ensure our students are ready for the test, we will offer CogAT(FxAT) prep classes for 2nd graders. These classes will be held on Saturdays at Thoreau Middle School (2505 Cedar Ln, Vienna, VA 22180).
All of our materials are carefully tailored to fit your children’s needs. The Sunshine Academy curriculum is unique, enhanced with full length color practice tests, and has been proven to help students perform well on the CogAT(FxAT) test. Many students have achieved perfect scores on the test.
Throughout theCogAT(FxAT) prep classes, students will take 5 full-length color practice tests that encompass all of the tested concepts. The objective of these practice tests is to familiarize our students with sample questions they will face on test day, along with the format of the tests, including the symbols used and the number of questions in each test area.
The schedule is as follows:
Saturday
9:00am—11:00am
11:00am-1:00pm
2:00pm-4:00pm
4:00pm—6:00pm
September
7, 14, 21, 28
October
5
The first Saturday class will start on September 7th and each class will last for 2 hours."
I have 3 kids. We are Asian American. Don’t know anyone who takes a cogat class. Mathnasium, kumon, piano lessons, weekend language, yes. You would really have to prioritize this cogat class over other everyday swim, soccer, violin, etc.
Your anecdote of 1 doesn't mean very much. You have time and other resources to support your children in other ways. Others take a more direct approach. Fwiw, this academy is like 90% Asian parents. It's a summer school + these other "add on" opportunities, with the ultimate prize being admittance to the Ivy League.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Cogat score received in mail today
Which school/pyramid? Cant believe they are mailing this out before uploading them on parentvue
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For local norms, does anyone know if they are based on base school or school attended (for immersion or other magnet/lottery schools)? I know "in pool" doesn't actually impact chances, just another referral pathway. Just curious if anyone knows what "local" means in this case.
How do you know it doesn’t impact chances? I’ve seen somewhere that in pool acceptance rate is roughly 2/3 while out pool is 1/3. I am unable to provide any sources so who knows how much of this is true, but if it is wouldn’t that mean better chance of app when in pool?
This has been discussed quite a bit on this forum. Just having the label "in-pool" does not matter. However, what does matter is that this means the child's COGAT and NNAT scores are high. The AAP committee will look at the whole package, and having high COGAT/NNAT scores will be a point in their favor for sure.
Sure, although surely the committee is aware of the kind of prepping that goes on in some corners and for those with near perfect scores they might more critically evaluate the whole packet. But that's just arm-chair speculation.
I think that's true for packages that show big gaps between nnat/cogat and other criteria (HOPE, iready, score card). I also think it's odd that people think of prepping in a negative light. From my point of view, prepping means the parents are more involved and invested in the kids education. It's not like they cheat or anything during those tests. Plus, kids are prepped on all kinds of tests in school, starting with SOL in 3rd garde.
It's not odd at all and we probably don't need to rehash this conversation as it's well trodden territory in this forum. There are parents who essentially sign their kids up for courses to prepare for the CogAT. As in many, many hours of instruction and practice led by outside individuals on how to ace the test. This isn't the same as getting a book and helping the child get familiar with the test format. And FCPS is well aware, hence the increasingly "holistic" process intended to address the inequity this presents.
This really is not the norm. We live in McLean and most parents probably get a cogat book off amazon and take a few practice tests. This is not going to move a 100 kid to 140.
Yes, I didn't even know there were courses for CogAT prep, but I have purchased books and other tools, and I don't see any problem with that. We live in a low SES area but are not in a URM group. I guess that "helps" my kid because the in pool cutoffs could be lower. Given the poor quality of education in gen ed, who wouldn't try to get their children the best possible education the family can afford?
I also don't see a problem with that, and I'm not trying to imply that this level of prep is a widespread norm, but there is a substantial group of parents that do a lot more than go through a few practice books. Look up Sunshine Academy. They even do i-ready prep. Here are more details to show there clearly is a demand for this as they have multiple saturday sections:
"All 2nd graders in Fairfax County will take the CogAT(FxAT) test in the coming fall. To ensure our students are ready for the test, we will offer CogAT(FxAT) prep classes for 2nd graders. These classes will be held on Saturdays at Thoreau Middle School (2505 Cedar Ln, Vienna, VA 22180).
All of our materials are carefully tailored to fit your children’s needs. The Sunshine Academy curriculum is unique, enhanced with full length color practice tests, and has been proven to help students perform well on the CogAT(FxAT) test. Many students have achieved perfect scores on the test.
Throughout theCogAT(FxAT) prep classes, students will take 5 full-length color practice tests that encompass all of the tested concepts. The objective of these practice tests is to familiarize our students with sample questions they will face on test day, along with the format of the tests, including the symbols used and the number of questions in each test area.
The schedule is as follows:
Saturday
9:00am—11:00am
11:00am-1:00pm
2:00pm-4:00pm
4:00pm—6:00pm
September
7, 14, 21, 28
October
5
The first Saturday class will start on September 7th and each class will last for 2 hours."
I have 3 kids. We are Asian American. Don’t know anyone who takes a cogat class. Mathnasium, kumon, piano lessons, weekend language, yes. You would really have to prioritize this cogat class over other everyday swim, soccer, violin, etc.
Your anecdote of 1 doesn't mean very much. You have time and other resources to support your children in other ways. Others take a more direct approach. Fwiw, this academy is like 90% Asian parents. It's a summer school + these other "add on" opportunities, with the ultimate prize being admittance to the Ivy League.
DH and I are ivy educated and we also have a goal of getting our kids into a top university. What I’m telling you is that most Asian Americans will do other activities over this. My kids have done chess, Science Olympiad, debate, etc. They don’t need to take a class to score 99th percentile. All 3 of my kids have scored 99th percentile.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For local norms, does anyone know if they are based on base school or school attended (for immersion or other magnet/lottery schools)? I know "in pool" doesn't actually impact chances, just another referral pathway. Just curious if anyone knows what "local" means in this case.
How do you know it doesn’t impact chances? I’ve seen somewhere that in pool acceptance rate is roughly 2/3 while out pool is 1/3. I am unable to provide any sources so who knows how much of this is true, but if it is wouldn’t that mean better chance of app when in pool?
My understanding it is one data point among many and screening is the same for in-pool and parent referred. Since there are many bright students who are parent referred yet might miss this cut off by small margin, and there are also many in-pool kids who are prepped and will not necessarily look as compelling on other data points (e.g., the HOPE and report cards), being in-pool may not confer as much of an advantage as it used to. Since they are trying to catch those who would not be screened otherwise but may need services, it doesn't make sense to consider this as a leg up. It's just one of many indicators that a child may need services.
I would think with the change in local norms, being in pool would mean more in pool kids would get in. At our high SES schools, you would need 140+ to be top 10%. I would also think at lower SES schools, the top 10% there would highly be likely placed in LIV at their local or center school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For local norms, does anyone know if they are based on base school or school attended (for immersion or other magnet/lottery schools)? I know "in pool" doesn't actually impact chances, just another referral pathway. Just curious if anyone knows what "local" means in this case.
How do you know it doesn’t impact chances? I’ve seen somewhere that in pool acceptance rate is roughly 2/3 while out pool is 1/3. I am unable to provide any sources so who knows how much of this is true, but if it is wouldn’t that mean better chance of app when in pool?
This has been discussed quite a bit on this forum. Just having the label "in-pool" does not matter. However, what does matter is that this means the child's COGAT and NNAT scores are high. The AAP committee will look at the whole package, and having high COGAT/NNAT scores will be a point in their favor for sure.
Sure, although surely the committee is aware of the kind of prepping that goes on in some corners and for those with near perfect scores they might more critically evaluate the whole packet. But that's just arm-chair speculation.
I think that's true for packages that show big gaps between nnat/cogat and other criteria (HOPE, iready, score card). I also think it's odd that people think of prepping in a negative light. From my point of view, prepping means the parents are more involved and invested in the kids education. It's not like they cheat or anything during those tests. Plus, kids are prepped on all kinds of tests in school, starting with SOL in 3rd garde.
It's not odd at all and we probably don't need to rehash this conversation as it's well trodden territory in this forum. There are parents who essentially sign their kids up for courses to prepare for the CogAT. As in many, many hours of instruction and practice led by outside individuals on how to ace the test. This isn't the same as getting a book and helping the child get familiar with the test format. And FCPS is well aware, hence the increasingly "holistic" process intended to address the inequity this presents.
This really is not the norm. We live in McLean and most parents probably get a cogat book off amazon and take a few practice tests. This is not going to move a 100 kid to 140.
Yes, I didn't even know there were courses for CogAT prep, but I have purchased books and other tools, and I don't see any problem with that. We live in a low SES area but are not in a URM group. I guess that "helps" my kid because the in pool cutoffs could be lower. Given the poor quality of education in gen ed, who wouldn't try to get their children the best possible education the family can afford?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For local norms, does anyone know if they are based on base school or school attended (for immersion or other magnet/lottery schools)? I know "in pool" doesn't actually impact chances, just another referral pathway. Just curious if anyone knows what "local" means in this case.
How do you know it doesn’t impact chances? I’ve seen somewhere that in pool acceptance rate is roughly 2/3 while out pool is 1/3. I am unable to provide any sources so who knows how much of this is true, but if it is wouldn’t that mean better chance of app when in pool?
This has been discussed quite a bit on this forum. Just having the label "in-pool" does not matter. However, what does matter is that this means the child's COGAT and NNAT scores are high. The AAP committee will look at the whole package, and having high COGAT/NNAT scores will be a point in their favor for sure.
Sure, although surely the committee is aware of the kind of prepping that goes on in some corners and for those with near perfect scores they might more critically evaluate the whole packet. But that's just arm-chair speculation.
I think that's true for packages that show big gaps between nnat/cogat and other criteria (HOPE, iready, score card). I also think it's odd that people think of prepping in a negative light. From my point of view, prepping means the parents are more involved and invested in the kids education. It's not like they cheat or anything during those tests. Plus, kids are prepped on all kinds of tests in school, starting with SOL in 3rd garde.
It's not odd at all and we probably don't need to rehash this conversation as it's well trodden territory in this forum. There are parents who essentially sign their kids up for courses to prepare for the CogAT. As in many, many hours of instruction and practice led by outside individuals on how to ace the test. This isn't the same as getting a book and helping the child get familiar with the test format. And FCPS is well aware, hence the increasingly "holistic" process intended to address the inequity this presents.
This really is not the norm. We live in McLean and most parents probably get a cogat book off amazon and take a few practice tests. This is not going to move a 100 kid to 140.
Yes, I didn't even know there were courses for CogAT prep, but I have purchased books and other tools, and I don't see any problem with that. We live in a low SES area but are not in a URM group. I guess that "helps" my kid because the in pool cutoffs could be lower. Given the poor quality of education in gen ed, who wouldn't try to get their children the best possible education the family can afford?
I also don't see a problem with that, and I'm not trying to imply that this level of prep is a widespread norm, but there is a substantial group of parents that do a lot more than go through a few practice books. Look up Sunshine Academy. They even do i-ready prep. Here are more details to show there clearly is a demand for this as they have multiple saturday sections:
"All 2nd graders in Fairfax County will take the CogAT(FxAT) test in the coming fall. To ensure our students are ready for the test, we will offer CogAT(FxAT) prep classes for 2nd graders. These classes will be held on Saturdays at Thoreau Middle School (2505 Cedar Ln, Vienna, VA 22180).
All of our materials are carefully tailored to fit your children’s needs. The Sunshine Academy curriculum is unique, enhanced with full length color practice tests, and has been proven to help students perform well on the CogAT(FxAT) test. Many students have achieved perfect scores on the test.
Throughout theCogAT(FxAT) prep classes, students will take 5 full-length color practice tests that encompass all of the tested concepts. The objective of these practice tests is to familiarize our students with sample questions they will face on test day, along with the format of the tests, including the symbols used and the number of questions in each test area.
The schedule is as follows:
Saturday
9:00am—11:00am
11:00am-1:00pm
2:00pm-4:00pm
4:00pm—6:00pm
September
7, 14, 21, 28
October
5
The first Saturday class will start on September 7th and each class will last for 2 hours."
I have 3 kids. We are Asian American. Don’t know anyone who takes a cogat class. Mathnasium, kumon, piano lessons, weekend language, yes. You would really have to prioritize this cogat class over other everyday swim, soccer, violin, etc.
Your anecdote of 1 doesn't mean very much. You have time and other resources to support your children in other ways. Others take a more direct approach. Fwiw, this academy is like 90% Asian parents. It's a summer school + these other "add on" opportunities, with the ultimate prize being admittance to the Ivy League.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For local norms, does anyone know if they are based on base school or school attended (for immersion or other magnet/lottery schools)? I know "in pool" doesn't actually impact chances, just another referral pathway. Just curious if anyone knows what "local" means in this case.
How do you know it doesn’t impact chances? I’ve seen somewhere that in pool acceptance rate is roughly 2/3 while out pool is 1/3. I am unable to provide any sources so who knows how much of this is true, but if it is wouldn’t that mean better chance of app when in pool?
This has been discussed quite a bit on this forum. Just having the label "in-pool" does not matter. However, what does matter is that this means the child's COGAT and NNAT scores are high. The AAP committee will look at the whole package, and having high COGAT/NNAT scores will be a point in their favor for sure.
Sure, although surely the committee is aware of the kind of prepping that goes on in some corners and for those with near perfect scores they might more critically evaluate the whole packet. But that's just arm-chair speculation.
I think that's true for packages that show big gaps between nnat/cogat and other criteria (HOPE, iready, score card). I also think it's odd that people think of prepping in a negative light. From my point of view, prepping means the parents are more involved and invested in the kids education. It's not like they cheat or anything during those tests. Plus, kids are prepped on all kinds of tests in school, starting with SOL in 3rd garde.
It's not odd at all and we probably don't need to rehash this conversation as it's well trodden territory in this forum. There are parents who essentially sign their kids up for courses to prepare for the CogAT. As in many, many hours of instruction and practice led by outside individuals on how to ace the test. This isn't the same as getting a book and helping the child get familiar with the test format. And FCPS is well aware, hence the increasingly "holistic" process intended to address the inequity this presents.
This really is not the norm. We live in McLean and most parents probably get a cogat book off amazon and take a few practice tests. This is not going to move a 100 kid to 140.
Yes, I didn't even know there were courses for CogAT prep, but I have purchased books and other tools, and I don't see any problem with that. We live in a low SES area but are not in a URM group. I guess that "helps" my kid because the in pool cutoffs could be lower. Given the poor quality of education in gen ed, who wouldn't try to get their children the best possible education the family can afford?
I also don't see a problem with that, and I'm not trying to imply that this level of prep is a widespread norm, but there is a substantial group of parents that do a lot more than go through a few practice books. Look up Sunshine Academy. They even do i-ready prep. Here are more details to show there clearly is a demand for this as they have multiple saturday sections:
"All 2nd graders in Fairfax County will take the CogAT(FxAT) test in the coming fall. To ensure our students are ready for the test, we will offer CogAT(FxAT) prep classes for 2nd graders. These classes will be held on Saturdays at Thoreau Middle School (2505 Cedar Ln, Vienna, VA 22180).
All of our materials are carefully tailored to fit your children’s needs. The Sunshine Academy curriculum is unique, enhanced with full length color practice tests, and has been proven to help students perform well on the CogAT(FxAT) test. Many students have achieved perfect scores on the test.
Throughout theCogAT(FxAT) prep classes, students will take 5 full-length color practice tests that encompass all of the tested concepts. The objective of these practice tests is to familiarize our students with sample questions they will face on test day, along with the format of the tests, including the symbols used and the number of questions in each test area.
The schedule is as follows:
Saturday
9:00am—11:00am
11:00am-1:00pm
2:00pm-4:00pm
4:00pm—6:00pm
September
7, 14, 21, 28
October
5
The first Saturday class will start on September 7th and each class will last for 2 hours."
I have 3 kids. We are Asian American. Don’t know anyone who takes a cogat class. Mathnasium, kumon, piano lessons, weekend language, yes. You would really have to prioritize this cogat class over other everyday swim, soccer, violin, etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For local norms, does anyone know if they are based on base school or school attended (for immersion or other magnet/lottery schools)? I know "in pool" doesn't actually impact chances, just another referral pathway. Just curious if anyone knows what "local" means in this case.
How do you know it doesn’t impact chances? I’ve seen somewhere that in pool acceptance rate is roughly 2/3 while out pool is 1/3. I am unable to provide any sources so who knows how much of this is true, but if it is wouldn’t that mean better chance of app when in pool?
This has been discussed quite a bit on this forum. Just having the label "in-pool" does not matter. However, what does matter is that this means the child's COGAT and NNAT scores are high. The AAP committee will look at the whole package, and having high COGAT/NNAT scores will be a point in their favor for sure.
Sure, although surely the committee is aware of the kind of prepping that goes on in some corners and for those with near perfect scores they might more critically evaluate the whole packet. But that's just arm-chair speculation.
I think that's true for packages that show big gaps between nnat/cogat and other criteria (HOPE, iready, score card). I also think it's odd that people think of prepping in a negative light. From my point of view, prepping means the parents are more involved and invested in the kids education. It's not like they cheat or anything during those tests. Plus, kids are prepped on all kinds of tests in school, starting with SOL in 3rd garde.
It's not odd at all and we probably don't need to rehash this conversation as it's well trodden territory in this forum. There are parents who essentially sign their kids up for courses to prepare for the CogAT. As in many, many hours of instruction and practice led by outside individuals on how to ace the test. This isn't the same as getting a book and helping the child get familiar with the test format. And FCPS is well aware, hence the increasingly "holistic" process intended to address the inequity this presents.
This really is not the norm. We live in McLean and most parents probably get a cogat book off amazon and take a few practice tests. This is not going to move a 100 kid to 140.
Yes, I didn't even know there were courses for CogAT prep, but I have purchased books and other tools, and I don't see any problem with that. We live in a low SES area but are not in a URM group. I guess that "helps" my kid because the in pool cutoffs could be lower. Given the poor quality of education in gen ed, who wouldn't try to get their children the best possible education the family can afford?
I also don't see a problem with that, and I'm not trying to imply that this level of prep is a widespread norm, but there is a substantial group of parents that do a lot more than go through a few practice books. Look up Sunshine Academy. They even do i-ready prep. Here are more details to show there clearly is a demand for this as they have multiple saturday sections:
"All 2nd graders in Fairfax County will take the CogAT(FxAT) test in the coming fall. To ensure our students are ready for the test, we will offer CogAT(FxAT) prep classes for 2nd graders. These classes will be held on Saturdays at Thoreau Middle School (2505 Cedar Ln, Vienna, VA 22180).
All of our materials are carefully tailored to fit your children’s needs. The Sunshine Academy curriculum is unique, enhanced with full length color practice tests, and has been proven to help students perform well on the CogAT(FxAT) test. Many students have achieved perfect scores on the test.
Throughout theCogAT(FxAT) prep classes, students will take 5 full-length color practice tests that encompass all of the tested concepts. The objective of these practice tests is to familiarize our students with sample questions they will face on test day, along with the format of the tests, including the symbols used and the number of questions in each test area.
The schedule is as follows:
Saturday
9:00am—11:00am
11:00am-1:00pm
2:00pm-4:00pm
4:00pm—6:00pm
September
7, 14, 21, 28
October
5
The first Saturday class will start on September 7th and each class will last for 2 hours."
Anonymous wrote:Cogat score received in mail today
Anonymous wrote:Cogat score received in mail today