Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emerson poll has Trump +10 in Iowa. But feel free to cling to whatever poll makes you happier.
Yes but Selzer is THE Iowa pollster. Emerson polls nationally and is parachuting in.
I'm really struggling with this because the gulf is so wide, but I trust Selzer on Iowa over anyone else.
Her result is still within a standard margin of error, making them effectively tied. But if true, that is a huge swing. Iowa should not be in play if Trump is winning.
Also I'm still reviewing details of the poll but the most interesting result: it has women 65+ voting Harris 2-1. That's a huge deal because that's a very reliable voting bloc-- older people vote at high rates and older women vote more reliably than men.
Yes. Older women are super super pissed. They don’t want people messing around with reproductive rights and they remember pre-roe and many have a lot of sad stories. Not so much back alley abortions, but misguided marriages and lost career opportunities.
Plus they don’t want the gop cratering social security and Medicare. The media has not given this much attention, but it has been a consistent plot line from the gop to get rid of those entitlements and older women are sensitive about the issue.
Some other analysis I've seen mentions that while young voters may have no memory of Trump's "grab 'em by the pussy," older women do remember. They are also more likely to accurately remember that Trump's economy was inherited from Obama and how badly Trump screwed up Covid response, stuff that many voters appear to have randomly forgotten or never knew. But it all undercuts Trump's argument to voters that they were "better off" when he was president.
That’s interesting because my oldest kid and their classmates have hated Trump since 2016. They are all 18-20 now.
They remember so I assumed all young voters were up on this.
I think Harris is going to win, but you'd be surprised how many 18-22 year olds are voting for Trump. Progressives have lost the plot with that generation. Someone not Trump would totally win that generation
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think she’s going to win Iowa but the people automatically discounting this don’t know anything about polls. Selzer is worshipped by the people who do. Keep in mind - go back a few pages - this makes sense when Trump is only up in Kansas by 5, Harris is up by 12 in the 2nd congressional district and down by only 4 in the 1st, and a Miami University poll of Ohio has him up there by only 3.
+1. Sitting here in Kansas absolutely surrounded by Harris signs (and, no, not in Lawrence). People are tired of his schtick and women here are appalled, including many of the 40-something traditional R voters I know. She probably will not win the state and may not win Iowa either, but these trends suggest potential blowouts elsewhere. I do not want to get my hopes up but at the same time, can’t deny the momentum. Fingers crossed!
I wish the Harris campaign had invested in Kansas. I know why they didn't, such a close election and they were already stretching with North Carolina. But have been saying since the Kanasas referendum (coupled with a Dem gov) that Kansas could be a surprise. I know it's on DLCC's list of states to grow in 2026.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emerson poll has Trump +10 in Iowa. But feel free to cling to whatever poll makes you happier.
Yes but Selzer is THE Iowa pollster. Emerson polls nationally and is parachuting in.
I'm really struggling with this because the gulf is so wide, but I trust Selzer on Iowa over anyone else.
Her result is still within a standard margin of error, making them effectively tied. But if true, that is a huge swing. Iowa should not be in play if Trump is winning.
Also I'm still reviewing details of the poll but the most interesting result: it has women 65+ voting Harris 2-1. That's a huge deal because that's a very reliable voting bloc-- older people vote at high rates and older women vote more reliably than men.
Yes. Older women are super super pissed. They don’t want people messing around with reproductive rights and they remember pre-roe and many have a lot of sad stories. Not so much back alley abortions, but misguided marriages and lost career opportunities.
Plus they don’t want the gop cratering social security and Medicare. The media has not given this much attention, but it has been a consistent plot line from the gop to get rid of those entitlements and older women are sensitive about the issue.
+1 Surprise, surprise-- older women are ignored.
Anonymous wrote:Stop already.
![]()
Anonymous wrote:Fwiw i am in a rural part of Florida this weekend and I am shocked how few Trump signs I am seeing - and how many Harris signs I am seeing here.
I don’t think Harris is winning FLorida - if only - but I do think that people are much much less enthusiastic about Trump than they used to be, and many (like me) are desperate to move on from this wretched era.
I know it seems shocking given his slick dance moves, his unconventional method of opening truck doors, and his top notch air fellatio skills. But somehow here we are.
I imagine that people in Iowa are probably feeling about the same.
Anyway, last night when I saw the Selzer poll it took everything I had not to stop people on the street to show it to them.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Keep dreaming about Iowa you liberal fools.
Make sure you have you “safe spaces” set up on Wednesday so you can go there and cry together.
Trump has two problems in Iowa abortion and farmers.
Farmers went bankrupt at a high rate because of his policies.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Fabrizio talking about 2020 as if:
(a) we didn't all watch on live TV as Trump's yahoos tried to take the capitol using force after that election, and
(b) Trump's hand-picked judges didn't overturn a fundamental right for women that had been secured in 1973 specifically to keep women from dying (as has started happening again).
We'll see what happens on Tuesday, but it's a different election than it was 4 years ago.
You act as if a) Biden and Harris didn’t go on a massive spending spree and cause prices to rise by 20%, b) Biden and Harris didn’t open up the border, inviting over 10 million illegal immigrants to come into the country.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Emerson poll has Trump +10 in Iowa. But feel free to cling to whatever poll makes you happier.
Yes but Selzer is THE Iowa pollster. Emerson polls nationally and is parachuting in.
I'm really struggling with this because the gulf is so wide, but I trust Selzer on Iowa over anyone else.
Her result is still within a standard margin of error, making them effectively tied. But if true, that is a huge swing. Iowa should not be in play if Trump is winning.
Also I'm still reviewing details of the poll but the most interesting result: it has women 65+ voting Harris 2-1. That's a huge deal because that's a very reliable voting bloc-- older people vote at high rates and older women vote more reliably than men.
Yes. Older women are super super pissed. They don’t want people messing around with reproductive rights and they remember pre-roe and many have a lot of sad stories. Not so much back alley abortions, but misguided marriages and lost career opportunities.
Plus they don’t want the gop cratering social security and Medicare. The media has not given this much attention, but it has been a consistent plot line from the gop to get rid of those entitlements and older women are sensitive about the issue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think she’s going to win Iowa but the people automatically discounting this don’t know anything about polls. Selzer is worshipped by the people who do. Keep in mind - go back a few pages - this makes sense when Trump is only up in Kansas by 5, Harris is up by 12 in the 2nd congressional district and down by only 4 in the 1st, and a Miami University poll of Ohio has him up there by only 3.
+1. Sitting here in Kansas absolutely surrounded by Harris signs (and, no, not in Lawrence). People are tired of his schtick and women here are appalled, including many of the 40-something traditional R voters I know. She probably will not win the state and may not win Iowa either, but these trends suggest potential blowouts elsewhere. I do not want to get my hopes up but at the same time, can’t deny the momentum. Fingers crossed!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a more reputable poll that shows Trump ahead by 10. Wishful thinking
https://emersoncollegepolling.com/november-2024-iowa-poll-trump-53-harris-43/
LOL Emerson is not more reputable than Selzer.
Silver himself says Emerson is guilty of herding so they are basically making up their results.
Yes she's retiring and throwing in a last hail Mary to hype up women lefties
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is a more reputable poll that shows Trump ahead by 10. Wishful thinking
https://emersoncollegepolling.com/november-2024-iowa-poll-trump-53-harris-43/
LOL Emerson is not more reputable than Selzer.
Silver himself says Emerson is guilty of herding so they are basically making up their results.
Anonymous wrote:Lol if you believe this. Have you been to Iowa? I grew up there. The Democrats are dead to those people. I have family members that were Democrats for years, but are now loyal Trump supporters. No chance those people are backing Kamala Harris.