Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is correct and is stating the obvious.

It’s making almost half the voting public so mad. They can’t believe women care about themselves. I mean… they(MAGA) don’t care about women, so it’s hard for them to wrap their brains around it.

Not even close to half. Support for going back to the Roe standard is around 70%. This is tyranny by the minority.

What kind of idiot overturns roe, that is supported by a huge major of the people, and then thinks he can run again and win? Trumo has poor quality analytical abilities and a lot of other poor qualities. What a loser.

Roe was unconstitutional. Judges aren’t supposed to go by public whim. They decided this issue properly, moving it to the states.

Haha. Give it up MAGA. Destroying roe was stupid.

Roe isn’t coming back. Enjoy the endless quest for a constitutional amendment.

Enjoy losing the election. And again in 2028 when you fools probably nominate that loser again.

Here’s what you need to get: whether Kamala wins or not, Roe isn’t coming back.

Here's what you need to get: you are not going to be able to force women to give birth against their will.

Vote in your state where this will be decided. It’s not going back to the federal level no matter how much you stomp your feet.

Feet stomping has nothing to do with it. Women will not be forced to give birth.

Then be smart about contraception and choice of sex partners. Women are not rabbits.

You are an ignorant a$$hole. You have never heard of ectopic pregnancy, rape, or trisomies?

Well what is it? A poster right before you wrote that we need Roe back bc women aren’t ready to be mothers. So do we need Roe for true medical issues or just because some women don’t want to be bothered??? I suspect most here think the latter and not the former.

Not your business. Give birth as much as you decide and it is no one else's business. Do not let anyone convince you otherwise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reality check about whether it's even possible to reinstate Roe. Just because Kamala Harris says she's going to wave her wand and reinstate Roe does not mean that's how things will work. This is just one more "promise" Harris has pulled out of her ass which will not come true.

She can't unilaterally bring back Roe. She needs Congress to pass something and that will never happen with a divided Congress. Just more absurd promises with no basis in reality.

Reality check that Trump WILL reinstate a 200 year old law called Comstock and immediately put a stop to all abortions across the country. No need to even deal with congress. Reality check that Trump will seat 2 justices ( Thomas and Alito will retire) that will be in their 30’s or 40’s that will be on the court for decades, making overturning Dobbs certainly impossible.
Harris won’t fix everything but Trump will make everything worse and lock it in for decades.

This is just true fear mongering. He has said - repeatedly - that he would never do that. You just sound insane.

No one takes you seriously when you say “he’s has said…”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reality check about whether it's even possible to reinstate Roe. Just because Kamala Harris says she's going to wave her wand and reinstate Roe does not mean that's how things will work. This is just one more "promise" Harris has pulled out of her ass which will not come true.

She can't unilaterally bring back Roe. She needs Congress to pass something and that will never happen with a divided Congress. Just more absurd promises with no basis in reality.

Reality check that Trump WILL reinstate a 200 year old law called Comstock and immediately put a stop to all abortions across the country. No need to even deal with congress. Reality check that Trump will seat 2 justices ( Thomas and Alito will retire) that will be in their 30’s or 40’s that will be on the court for decades, making overturning Dobbs certainly impossible.
Harris won’t fix everything but Trump will make everything worse and lock it in for decades.

This is just true fear mongering. He has said - repeatedly - that he would never do that. You just sound insane.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reality check about whether it's even possible to reinstate Roe. Just because Kamala Harris says she's going to wave her wand and reinstate Roe does not mean that's how things will work. This is just one more "promise" Harris has pulled out of her ass which will not come true.

She can't unilaterally bring back Roe. She needs Congress to pass something and that will never happen with a divided Congress. Just more absurd promises with no basis in reality.

Reality check that Trump WILL reinstate a 200 year old law called Comstock and immediately put a stop to all abortions across the country. No need to even deal with congress. Reality check that Trump will seat 2 justices ( Thomas and Alito will retire) that will be in their 30’s or 40’s that will be on the court for decades, making overturning Dobbs certainly impossible.
Harris won’t fix everything but Trump will make everything worse and lock it in for decades.

This is just true fear mongering. He has said - repeatedly - that he would never do that. You just sound insane.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Reality check about whether it's even possible to reinstate Roe. Just because Kamala Harris says she's going to wave her wand and reinstate Roe does not mean that's how things will work. This is just one more "promise" Harris has pulled out of her ass which will not come true.

She can't unilaterally bring back Roe. She needs Congress to pass something and that will never happen with a divided Congress. Just more absurd promises with no basis in reality.

Reality check that Trump WILL reinstate a 200 year old law called Comstock and immediately put a stop to all abortions across the country. No need to even deal with congress. Reality check that Trump will seat 2 justices ( Thomas and Alito will retire) that will be in their 30’s or 40’s that will be on the court for decades, making overturning Dobbs certainly impossible.
Harris won’t fix everything but Trump will make everything worse and lock it in for decades.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting next week and abortion is not important criteria to me.

Economy, immigration and strong defense are my priorities. Also I cannot stand the woke agenda.

Totally agree.

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting next week and abortion is not important criteria to me.

Economy, immigration and strong defense are my priorities. Also I cannot stand the woke agenda.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I already voted, and a lot of women I know have already voted, but we surely were not motivated to turn out by abortion. We were motivated to turn out by the last four years of this terrible economy and border crisis. The contention of liberals that women are all single issue abortion voters is so tiring.

“ I’m not worthy of full rights and bodily autonomy. Let stronger and smarter men be the steward of what is best for me and my daughters.”

+1

If you’re just going to vote to end your own rights, maybe don’t vote instead of trying to take every other woman down with you. If Trump wins, in a few years I guarantee you’ll be able to see the connection between abortion and the rest of what your Christofascist party wants to do to rights.

Wow, another sane and tolerant liberal! And please don't mock my devotion to Christ and his teachings.Good luck to you on judgment day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is correct and is stating the obvious.

It’s making almost half the voting public so mad. They can’t believe women care about themselves. I mean… they(MAGA) don’t care about women, so it’s hard for them to wrap their brains around it.

Not even close to half. Support for going back to the Roe standard is around 70%. This is tyranny by the minority.

What kind of idiot overturns roe, that is supported by a huge major of the people, and then thinks he can run again and win? Trumo has poor quality analytical abilities and a lot of other poor qualities. What a loser.

Roe was unconstitutional. Judges aren’t supposed to go by public whim. They decided this issue properly, moving it to the states.

Haha. Give it up MAGA. Destroying roe was stupid.

Roe isn’t coming back. Enjoy the endless quest for a constitutional amendment.

Enjoy losing the election. And again in 2028 when you fools probably nominate that loser again.

Here’s what you need to get: whether Kamala wins or not, Roe isn’t coming back.

Here's what you need to get: you are not going to be able to force women to give birth against their will.

Vote in your state where this will be decided. It’s not going back to the federal level no matter how much you stomp your feet.

Feet stomping has nothing to do with it. Women will not be forced to give birth.

Then be smart about contraception and choice of sex partners. Women are not rabbits.

You are an ignorant a$$hole. You have never heard of ectopic pregnancy, rape, or trisomies?

Well what is it? A poster right before you wrote that we need Roe back bc women aren’t ready to be mothers. So do we need Roe for true medical issues or just because some women don’t want to be bothered??? I suspect most here think the latter and not the former.

Not your business. Give birth as much as you decide and it is no one else's business. Do not let anyone convince you otherwise.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is correct and is stating the obvious.

It’s making almost half the voting public so mad. They can’t believe women care about themselves. I mean… they(MAGA) don’t care about women, so it’s hard for them to wrap their brains around it.

Not even close to half. Support for going back to the Roe standard is around 70%. This is tyranny by the minority.

What kind of idiot overturns roe, that is supported by a huge major of the people, and then thinks he can run again and win? Trumo has poor quality analytical abilities and a lot of other poor qualities. What a loser.

Roe was unconstitutional. Judges aren’t supposed to go by public whim. They decided this issue properly, moving it to the states.

Haha. Give it up MAGA. Destroying roe was stupid.

Roe isn’t coming back. Enjoy the endless quest for a constitutional amendment.

Enjoy losing the election. And again in 2028 when you fools probably nominate that loser again.

Here’s what you need to get: whether Kamala wins or not, Roe isn’t coming back.

Here's what you need to get: you are not going to be able to force women to give birth against their will.

Vote in your state where this will be decided. It’s not going back to the federal level no matter how much you stomp your feet.

Feet stomping has nothing to do with it. Women will not be forced to give birth.

Then be smart about contraception and choice of sex partners. Women are not rabbits.

You are an ignorant a$$hole. You have never heard of ectopic pregnancy, rape, or trisomies?

Well what is it? A poster right before you wrote that we need Roe back bc women aren’t ready to be mothers. So do we need Roe for true medical issues or just because some women don’t want to be bothered??? I suspect most here think the latter and not the former.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m voting next week and abortion is not important criteria to me.

Economy, immigration and strong defense are my priorities. Also I cannot stand the woke agenda.

You sound a little snowflaky and probably a little controlling.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is correct and is stating the obvious.

It’s making almost half the voting public so mad. They can’t believe women care about themselves. I mean… they(MAGA) don’t care about women, so it’s hard for them to wrap their brains around it.

Not even close to half. Support for going back to the Roe standard is around 70%. This is tyranny by the minority.

What kind of idiot overturns roe, that is supported by a huge major of the people, and then thinks he can run again and win? Trumo has poor quality analytical abilities and a lot of other poor qualities. What a loser.

Roe was unconstitutional. Judges aren’t supposed to go by public whim. They decided this issue properly, moving it to the states.

Haha. Give it up MAGA. Destroying roe was stupid.

Roe isn’t coming back. Enjoy the endless quest for a constitutional amendment.

Enjoy losing the election. And again in 2028 when you fools probably nominate that loser again.

Here’s what you need to get: whether Kamala wins or not, Roe isn’t coming back.

Here's what you need to get: you are not going to be able to force women to give birth against their will.

Vote in your state where this will be decided. It’s not going back to the federal level no matter how much you stomp your feet.

Feet stomping has nothing to do with it. Women will not be forced to give birth.

Then be smart about contraception and choice of sex partners. Women are not rabbits.

You are an ignorant a$$hole. You have never heard of ectopic pregnancy, rape, or trisomies?

Well what is it? A poster right before you wrote that we need Roe back bc women aren’t ready to be mothers. So do we need Roe for true medical issues or just because some women don’t want to be bothered??? I suspect most here think the latter and not the former.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is correct and is stating the obvious.

It’s making almost half the voting public so mad. They can’t believe women care about themselves. I mean… they(MAGA) don’t care about women, so it’s hard for them to wrap their brains around it.

Not even close to half. Support for going back to the Roe standard is around 70%. This is tyranny by the minority.

What kind of idiot overturns roe, that is supported by a huge major of the people, and then thinks he can run again and win? Trumo has poor quality analytical abilities and a lot of other poor qualities. What a loser.

Roe was unconstitutional. Judges aren’t supposed to go by public whim. They decided this issue properly, moving it to the states.

Haha. Give it up MAGA. Destroying roe was stupid.

Roe isn’t coming back. Enjoy the endless quest for a constitutional amendment.

Enjoy losing the election. And again in 2028 when you fools probably nominate that loser again.

Here’s what you need to get: whether Kamala wins or not, Roe isn’t coming back.

Here's what you need to get: you are not going to be able to force women to give birth against their will.

Vote in your state where this will be decided. It’s not going back to the federal level no matter how much you stomp your feet.

Feet stomping has nothing to do with it. Women will not be forced to give birth.

Then be smart about contraception and choice of sex partners. Women are not rabbits.

You are an ignorant a$$hole. You have never heard of ectopic pregnancy, rape, or trisomies?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He is correct and is stating the obvious.

It’s making almost half the voting public so mad. They can’t believe women care about themselves. I mean… they(MAGA) don’t care about women, so it’s hard for them to wrap their brains around it.

Not even close to half. Support for going back to the Roe standard is around 70%. This is tyranny by the minority.

What kind of idiot overturns roe, that is supported by a huge major of the people, and then thinks he can run again and win? Trumo has poor quality analytical abilities and a lot of other poor qualities. What a loser.

Roe was unconstitutional. Judges aren’t supposed to go by public whim. They decided this issue properly, moving it to the states.

Haha. Give it up MAGA. Destroying roe was stupid.

Roe isn’t coming back. Enjoy the endless quest for a constitutional amendment.

Enjoy losing the election. And again in 2028 when you fools probably nominate that loser again.

Here’s what you need to get: whether Kamala wins or not, Roe isn’t coming back.

Here's what you need to get: you are not going to be able to force women to give birth against their will.

Vote in your state where this will be decided. It’s not going back to the federal level no matter how much you stomp your feet.

Feet stomping has nothing to do with it. Women will not be forced to give birth.

Then be smart about contraception and choice of sex partners. Women are not rabbits.

You are an ignorant a$$hole. You have never heard of ectopic pregnancy, rape, or trisomies?

Anonymous wrote:Reality check about whether it's even possible to reinstate Roe. Just because Kamala Harris says she's going to wave her wand and reinstate Roe does not mean that's how things will work. This is just one more "promise" Harris has pulled out of her ass which will not come true.

She can't unilaterally bring back Roe. She needs Congress to pass something and that will never happen with a divided Congress. Just more absurd promises with no basis in reality.