Anonymous wrote:I am halfway through it and its actually interesting and engaging, and I think it will be viewed as a savvy move with good reach. Kamala should have done it as well.

Anonymous wrote:I with Kamal did the Rogan podcast. Then people will see the contrast between the two. Unfortunately, a missed opportunity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I have seen many clips of Kamala not reading from a teleprompter and she is well able to communicate and discuss issues.

HARRIS: "The governor and I, we were all doing a tour of the library here and talking about the significance of the passage of time, right, the significance of the passage of time. So, when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time in terms of what we need to do to lay these wires. what we need to do to create these jobs. And there is such great significance to the passage of time when we think about a day in the life of our children."

She's an idiot!

Truly, Harris is more articulate and well spoken than the entire MAGA electorate. The reason Trump is so popular is that he appeals to morons.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wish Harris were going on as well (separately of course)

A long form conversation in which she can be seated, relaxed and have time to really communicate her ideas and experiences would do so much good.

You mean like the approx 4,000 of these interviews she's done over the last few weeks?

She's been good in the sit down interviews. She's better at it than in town halls. She decent with a prepared speech but I think she struggles working with crowds. But she's pretty good 1:1. She was even good in the Fox interview and held her ground against very combative questioning.

I bet the reason she didn't do Rogan is that he wouldn't agree to certain ground rules for fairness that even Fox would agree to. Like he'd probably take portions of her interview and remix them just to make fun of the way her voice sounds or make it seem like she was farting or something. It wouldn't be worth the risk.

Have you ever listened to his podcast? He doesn’t do things like that.

You have no clue. Yikes.

We don’t all have time to listen to the gutter. He might not do that exactly, but something like that. DP.

I'm not a big Joe Rogan fan, but PP is right - you have no understanding of the format of his show.

Yeah, pretty sure I indicated that when I said I said I don’t have time to listen to that kind of gutter show. The clips I’ve seen over the years are dumb enough and Rogan comes across as about as bright as your average Trumper.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wish Harris were going on as well (separately of course)

A long form conversation in which she can be seated, relaxed and have time to really communicate her ideas and experiences would do so much good.

You mean like the approx 4,000 of these interviews she's done over the last few weeks?

She's been good in the sit down interviews. She's better at it than in town halls. She decent with a prepared speech but I think she struggles working with crowds. But she's pretty good 1:1. She was even good in the Fox interview and held her ground against very combative questioning.

I bet the reason she didn't do Rogan is that he wouldn't agree to certain ground rules for fairness that even Fox would agree to. Like he'd probably take portions of her interview and remix them just to make fun of the way her voice sounds or make it seem like she was farting or something. It wouldn't be worth the risk.

Have you ever listened to his podcast? He doesn’t do things like that.

You have no clue. Yikes.

We don’t all have time to listen to the gutter. He might not do that exactly, but something like that. DP.

I'm not a big Joe Rogan fan, but PP is right - you have no understanding of the format of his show.

I listen to Rogan whenever he has an interesting person in. The format is a several hour, long-ranging conversation. Joe lets people speak, is respectful, but doesn't hesitate to disagree. There is no editing that I can tell, apart from pee breaks since they're talking for 3 hours.

3 hours is a lot of time to reveal your actual thoughts, policies and plans. It's revealing.

It revealed once again that Trump is incoherent and unfit to serve.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Donald Trump has spoken repeatedly about believing in exceptions like rape and life of the mother but yet liberals still shape the abortion debate by using emergency abortions instead of elective ones so either they can’t defend or think elective ones are wrong or they have difficulty justifying it

And yet as we have seen in cases in places where abortion was banned recently, women are left to die when in urgent need of an abortion because doctors are afraid of being arrested for saving her life.

10 year old rape victims have to travel out of state for abortions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Yes I have seen many clips of Kamala not reading from a teleprompter and she is well able to communicate and discuss issues.

HARRIS: "The governor and I, we were all doing a tour of the library here and talking about the significance of the passage of time, right, the significance of the passage of time. So, when you think about it, there is great significance to the passage of time in terms of what we need to do to lay these wires. what we need to do to create these jobs. And there is such great significance to the passage of time when we think about a day in the life of our children."

She's an idiot!

Anonymous wrote:Trump was babbling complete gobbledygook and word salad on Rogan's show.

Anonymous wrote:One would think someone who served as President for four years could correctly answer how many nations have nuclear weapons. But not Trump.

Not even close. Try 9:

United States
Russia
United Kingdom
France
China
India
Pakistan
North Korea
Israel

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wish Harris were going on as well (separately of course)

A long form conversation in which she can be seated, relaxed and have time to really communicate her ideas and experiences would do so much good.

You mean like the approx 4,000 of these interviews she's done over the last few weeks?

She's been good in the sit down interviews. She's better at it than in town halls. She decent with a prepared speech but I think she struggles working with crowds. But she's pretty good 1:1. She was even good in the Fox interview and held her ground against very combative questioning.

I bet the reason she didn't do Rogan is that he wouldn't agree to certain ground rules for fairness that even Fox would agree to. Like he'd probably take portions of her interview and remix them just to make fun of the way her voice sounds or make it seem like she was farting or something. It wouldn't be worth the risk.

Have you ever listened to his podcast? He doesn’t do things like that.

You have no clue. Yikes.

We don’t all have time to listen to the gutter. He might not do that exactly, but something like that. DP.

I'm not a big Joe Rogan fan, but PP is right - you have no understanding of the format of his show.

I listen to Rogan whenever he has an interesting person in. The format is a several hour, long-ranging conversation. Joe lets people speak, is respectful, but doesn't hesitate to disagree. There is no editing that I can tell, apart from pee breaks since they're talking for 3 hours.

3 hours is a lot of time to reveal your actual thoughts, policies and plans. It's revealing.