Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Amber also had her own kid and Scott accepted that. So, according to the guilters, Scott wanted to leave Laci and not become a father and leave her for Amber, a single mom? He wanted to be a stepfather instead?

I don’t think Scott actually wanted to be with Amber. I think he just realized as the baby’s due date approached that he was going to lose his freedom to have affairs and do as he pleases.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Nothing about the state’s motive or timeline made any sense.

I think if the case was tried today, Scott would’ve been acquitted.

Unfortunately, people couldn’t get over the fact that Scott didn’t properly grieve Laci and was an a hole lying to his mistress and speaking to her during the candlelight vigil.

Lack of emotion and cheating doesn’t make him a sociopath. You’d be surprised how many males are detached just like Scott and wouldn’t necessarily break into a million pieces if their wife or child went missing. Some guys are just stoic

Luckily the state of California doesn’t agree with you. Scott could have taken a polygraph but declined.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Scott didn’t want to be a father, he could’ve easily waited for the kid to be born and accidentally smother it or something.

Why would he have to kill Laci and double his load?

The fishing boat he used was shallow enough to view his shins/ knees from another boat. It would’ve capsized if he had a 150+ lb Laci on it. You think he handled a dead body in public view of everybody and trucked along a dead body from the parking lot all the way to the marina and nobody saw it was obviously a fully human body in a body bag?

He was at the marina at 12pm-2pm and witnesses saw him. He wasn’t at a park after midnight

He also never told anyone he bought a boat, was making homemade concrete anchors with no rope, told Amber on the day he bought the boat that he lost his wife (before she was missing), and couldn’t decide if he was golfing or at the marina Christmas Eve because he told different people different stories.

And yet precisely all of that is circumstantial. It’s circumstance that Scott had an AP, told her he’s no longer with his wife/she’s gone, and circumstance that Scott also lied to his wife and didn’t tell her about a boat (which we really won’t know for sure-Laci knew about Scott’s past cheating and still made him out to be some amazing guy to her family so it is possible she did know about the boat), and it’s also circumstance that he originally planned to golf but decided to go fishing that day.

It is absurd to think he can lug around Lacis heavily pregnant dead body from the parking lot to the marina, and hook it up to anchors and dump and sink it without anyone looking.

Anonymous wrote:Amber also had her own kid and Scott accepted that. So, according to the guilters, Scott wanted to leave Laci and not become a father and leave her for Amber, a single mom? He wanted to be a stepfather instead?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Scott didn’t want to be a father, he could’ve easily waited for the kid to be born and accidentally smother it or something.

Why would he have to kill Laci and double his load?

The fishing boat he used was shallow enough to view his shins/ knees from another boat. It would’ve capsized if he had a 150+ lb Laci on it. You think he handled a dead body in public view of everybody and trucked along a dead body from the parking lot all the way to the marina and nobody saw it was obviously a fully human body in a body bag?

He was at the marina at 12pm-2pm and witnesses saw him. He wasn’t at a park after midnight

He also never told anyone he bought a boat, was making homemade concrete anchors with no rope, told Amber on the day he bought the boat that he lost his wife (before she was missing), and couldn’t decide if he was golfing or at the marina Christmas Eve because he told different people different stories.

Anonymous wrote:Nothing about the state’s motive or timeline made any sense.

I think if the case was tried today, Scott would’ve been acquitted.

Unfortunately, people couldn’t get over the fact that Scott didn’t properly grieve Laci and was an a hole lying to his mistress and speaking to her during the candlelight vigil.

Lack of emotion and cheating doesn’t make him a sociopath. You’d be surprised how many males are detached just like Scott and wouldn’t necessarily break into a million pieces if their wife or child went missing. Some guys are just stoic

Anonymous wrote:If Scott didn’t want to be a father, he could’ve easily waited for the kid to be born and accidentally smother it or something.

Why would he have to kill Laci and double his load?

The fishing boat he used was shallow enough to view his shins/ knees from another boat. It would’ve capsized if he had a 150+ lb Laci on it. You think he handled a dead body in public view of everybody and trucked along a dead body from the parking lot all the way to the marina and nobody saw it was obviously a fully human body in a body bag?

He was at the marina at 12pm-2pm and witnesses saw him. He wasn’t at a park after midnight

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public opinion and even the police opinion is driven by the media unfortunately. People wanted to take the words of Amber very seriously as if she’s some moral paragon of virtue. She saw no problem with being a mistress to a married man with a pregnant wife at home

I see no reason to drag Amber through the mud. She didn't know she was a mistress. She thought he was her boyfriend. He told her that he lost his wife and this would be the first Christmas without her, and that was before she was dead.

And when she did know who he was because of all the media coverage, she went to the police and the audio recordings she helped to facilitate are likely a large part of why he is in prison today.

Ahh so you trust a police patsy? Amber was a poor massage therapist and surely made a killing (no pun intended) from this charade. I don’t trust her farther than I can spit.

I’m not saying Scott is Husband of the Year. He isn’t but the entire trial weighed on the testimony of Amber Frey. I never liked or trusted Amber or thought she was being honest.

I also always believed Scott was innocent. It makes no sense why he wouldn’t confess after all these years since he was sentenced to life anyway. I don’t think he was a sociopath who would dismember and behead his wife and wrap twine around his sons neck without leaving a trace.

I think Laci was being nosy and walked in to the confront the house robbers across the street and they kidnapped her.

You think an 8 month pregnant woman is going to investigate a possible crime alone? She could walk back home and call the police?

Yes. Laci’s personality was very forward and talkative according to family. Originally, Lacis family believed Scott was innocent and the robbers did it. The first couple of weeks they were upset at Nancy Grace and others for pointing the finger at Scott.

After Amber Frey came forward, Lacis family were convinced Scott killed Laci.

This. If he turns out to be innocent, there’s a special place in hell for Sharon Rocha.

An innocent man would not tell his mostess that his wife is dead or bleach his hair and flee to Mexico. I know, I know, maybe he just wanted to fish in Mexico, and he always wanted to try blond hair.

Scott is where he belongs.

Running away and dying his hair was to avoid paparazzi, the mobs swarming his house, and jail. It has nothing to do with guilt.

This country is insane when it comes to media brainwashing

Uh huh. It was just a coincidence that he had to drive toward Mexico to avoid paparazzi. He could not avoid them in Oregon or Nevada, which were similar distances, but only in Mexico.

He killed her. But he wasn’t heading towards Mexico. One of his siblings lived in San Diego. He was staying with them. You don’t have to exaggerate to show he’s guilty. There is enough otherwise.

So he had $15000 in cash, his brother’s ID, multiple weapons, dyed his hair, multiple cell phones, etc just to hang out? Are you always this gullible?

The SP Stans take gullibility to new heights. Why even engage?

It’s bizarre. I have been watching the documentary expecting to see something that might make me think there’s more to it. But, nope. I come away thinking he’s definitely guilty without a shred of doubt. Why is this even a thing right now? Let that trash rot in jail.

The American Justice system was built on guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

There are reasonable doubts about Scott’s guilt namely the baby with twine around the neck seemingly born alive and handled outside the water.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public opinion and even the police opinion is driven by the media unfortunately. People wanted to take the words of Amber very seriously as if she’s some moral paragon of virtue. She saw no problem with being a mistress to a married man with a pregnant wife at home

I see no reason to drag Amber through the mud. She didn't know she was a mistress. She thought he was her boyfriend. He told her that he lost his wife and this would be the first Christmas without her, and that was before she was dead.

And when she did know who he was because of all the media coverage, she went to the police and the audio recordings she helped to facilitate are likely a large part of why he is in prison today.

Ahh so you trust a police patsy? Amber was a poor massage therapist and surely made a killing (no pun intended) from this charade. I don’t trust her farther than I can spit.

I’m not saying Scott is Husband of the Year. He isn’t but the entire trial weighed on the testimony of Amber Frey. I never liked or trusted Amber or thought she was being honest.

I also always believed Scott was innocent. It makes no sense why he wouldn’t confess after all these years since he was sentenced to life anyway. I don’t think he was a sociopath who would dismember and behead his wife and wrap twine around his sons neck without leaving a trace.

I think Laci was being nosy and walked in to the confront the house robbers across the street and they kidnapped her.

You think an 8 month pregnant woman is going to investigate a possible crime alone? She could walk back home and call the police?

Yes. Laci’s personality was very forward and talkative according to family. Originally, Lacis family believed Scott was innocent and the robbers did it. The first couple of weeks they were upset at Nancy Grace and others for pointing the finger at Scott.

After Amber Frey came forward, Lacis family were convinced Scott killed Laci.

This. If he turns out to be innocent, there’s a special place in hell for Sharon Rocha.

An innocent man would not tell his mostess that his wife is dead or bleach his hair and flee to Mexico. I know, I know, maybe he just wanted to fish in Mexico, and he always wanted to try blond hair.

Scott is where he belongs.

Running away and dying his hair was to avoid paparazzi, the mobs swarming his house, and jail. It has nothing to do with guilt.

This country is insane when it comes to media brainwashing

Uh huh. It was just a coincidence that he had to drive toward Mexico to avoid paparazzi. He could not avoid them in Oregon or Nevada, which were similar distances, but only in Mexico.

He killed her. But he wasn’t heading towards Mexico. One of his siblings lived in San Diego. He was staying with them. You don’t have to exaggerate to show he’s guilty. There is enough otherwise.

So he had $15000 in cash, his brother’s ID, multiple weapons, dyed his hair, multiple cell phones, etc just to hang out? Are you always this gullible?

The SP Stans take gullibility to new heights. Why even engage?

It’s bizarre. I have been watching the documentary expecting to see something that might make me think there’s more to it. But, nope. I come away thinking he’s definitely guilty without a shred of doubt. Why is this even a thing right now? Let that trash rot in jail.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public opinion and even the police opinion is driven by the media unfortunately. People wanted to take the words of Amber very seriously as if she’s some moral paragon of virtue. She saw no problem with being a mistress to a married man with a pregnant wife at home

I see no reason to drag Amber through the mud. She didn't know she was a mistress. She thought he was her boyfriend. He told her that he lost his wife and this would be the first Christmas without her, and that was before she was dead.

And when she did know who he was because of all the media coverage, she went to the police and the audio recordings she helped to facilitate are likely a large part of why he is in prison today.

Ahh so you trust a police patsy? Amber was a poor massage therapist and surely made a killing (no pun intended) from this charade. I don’t trust her farther than I can spit.

I’m not saying Scott is Husband of the Year. He isn’t but the entire trial weighed on the testimony of Amber Frey. I never liked or trusted Amber or thought she was being honest.

I also always believed Scott was innocent. It makes no sense why he wouldn’t confess after all these years since he was sentenced to life anyway. I don’t think he was a sociopath who would dismember and behead his wife and wrap twine around his sons neck without leaving a trace.

I think Laci was being nosy and walked in to the confront the house robbers across the street and they kidnapped her.

You think an 8 month pregnant woman is going to investigate a possible crime alone? She could walk back home and call the police?

Yes. Laci’s personality was very forward and talkative according to family. Originally, Lacis family believed Scott was innocent and the robbers did it. The first couple of weeks they were upset at Nancy Grace and others for pointing the finger at Scott.

After Amber Frey came forward, Lacis family were convinced Scott killed Laci.

This. If he turns out to be innocent, there’s a special place in hell for Sharon Rocha.

An innocent man would not tell his mostess that his wife is dead or bleach his hair and flee to Mexico. I know, I know, maybe he just wanted to fish in Mexico, and he always wanted to try blond hair.

Scott is where he belongs.

Running away and dying his hair was to avoid paparazzi, the mobs swarming his house, and jail. It has nothing to do with guilt.

This country is insane when it comes to media brainwashing

Uh huh. It was just a coincidence that he had to drive toward Mexico to avoid paparazzi. He could not avoid them in Oregon or Nevada, which were similar distances, but only in Mexico.

He killed her. But he wasn’t heading towards Mexico. One of his siblings lived in San Diego. He was staying with them. You don’t have to exaggerate to show he’s guilty. There is enough otherwise.

So he had $15000 in cash, his brother’s ID, multiple weapons, dyed his hair, multiple cell phones, etc just to hang out? Are you always this gullible?

The SP Stans take gullibility to new heights. Why even engage?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The public opinion and even the police opinion is driven by the media unfortunately. People wanted to take the words of Amber very seriously as if she’s some moral paragon of virtue. She saw no problem with being a mistress to a married man with a pregnant wife at home

I see no reason to drag Amber through the mud. She didn't know she was a mistress. She thought he was her boyfriend. He told her that he lost his wife and this would be the first Christmas without her, and that was before she was dead.

And when she did know who he was because of all the media coverage, she went to the police and the audio recordings she helped to facilitate are likely a large part of why he is in prison today.

Ahh so you trust a police patsy? Amber was a poor massage therapist and surely made a killing (no pun intended) from this charade. I don’t trust her farther than I can spit.

I’m not saying Scott is Husband of the Year. He isn’t but the entire trial weighed on the testimony of Amber Frey. I never liked or trusted Amber or thought she was being honest.

I also always believed Scott was innocent. It makes no sense why he wouldn’t confess after all these years since he was sentenced to life anyway. I don’t think he was a sociopath who would dismember and behead his wife and wrap twine around his sons neck without leaving a trace.

I think Laci was being nosy and walked in to the confront the house robbers across the street and they kidnapped her.

You think an 8 month pregnant woman is going to investigate a possible crime alone? She could walk back home and call the police?

Yes. Laci’s personality was very forward and talkative according to family. Originally, Lacis family believed Scott was innocent and the robbers did it. The first couple of weeks they were upset at Nancy Grace and others for pointing the finger at Scott.

After Amber Frey came forward, Lacis family were convinced Scott killed Laci.

This. If he turns out to be innocent, there’s a special place in hell for Sharon Rocha.

An innocent man would not tell his mostess that his wife is dead or bleach his hair and flee to Mexico. I know, I know, maybe he just wanted to fish in Mexico, and he always wanted to try blond hair.

Scott is where he belongs.

Running away and dying his hair was to avoid paparazzi, the mobs swarming his house, and jail. It has nothing to do with guilt.

This country is insane when it comes to media brainwashing

Uh huh. It was just a coincidence that he had to drive toward Mexico to avoid paparazzi. He could not avoid them in Oregon or Nevada, which were similar distances, but only in Mexico.

He killed her. But he wasn’t heading towards Mexico. One of his siblings lived in San Diego. He was staying with them. You don’t have to exaggerate to show he’s guilty. There is enough otherwise.

So he had $15000 in cash, his brother’s ID, multiple weapons, dyed his hair, multiple cell phones, etc just to hang out? Are you always this gullible?