Anonymous wrote:I just wanna see a debate between the two.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction

JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.

JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...

DP. I'm not going to comment on his stint in the marines but I will say, every Yale law grad I've known has been crazy, and not in a good way. Harvard law, that's (still) respectable. Yalies, not so much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Do not teach your kids to stay in an abusive marriage. WTF. Teach them to get out and live a better life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Didn't Vance write the book that became a movie starring Amy Adams as his mom and Glenn Close as grandmaw or mee maw? Hillbilly Elegy?

Yes, that book showed his true disdain for middle America. And yet, those very same people are going to vote for him.

So what? He lived it. He understands it. He’s allowed to feel any way he wants about it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction

JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.

JD was fat and out of shape when he entered the military. He saw no combat - he worked in the communications office instead of going to battle. To suggest he's a big war expert is a big stretch...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:JD Vance isn’t for funding the war in Ukraine and leading us to nuclear war or WW3 so that’s refreshing . He chose a non war hawk and someone who actually is a vet. Genius choice from Trump after the failed “suckers and losers” lie. I figure vets are less likely to be so war hawkish . Tulsi Gabbard is another vet who I hope he selects in his administration. She read Kamala so accurately the first time she provided a biting criticism as a retort . She said Kamalas laugh reveals low confidence, uncertainty . and discomfort and is used to soften her word salad and lack of ability to honestly communicate feelings and direction

JD is marine and a lawyer. He went to Yale law. He understands war.

Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4778323-trump-campaign-vice-presidential-debate/amp/


Hilarious. Vance won’t commit to debating Harris quite yet. He would destroy her in a debate as he can really talk and debate well. Harris is only ok.


But what is funny, and kinda true is that he is not sure she will even be the VP candidate in a few weeks!!! If they replace Biden with anyone else, then they may not keep Harris on the ticket. Also Harris may be elevated to the presidential nominee, so I see his point not committing until the nominations is resolved

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The way Trump supporters talk about him is the same way you'd talk about a creepy uncle. "Sure, he touches my daughter when he visits. But he always brings me a crisp twenty." You know he's trash but you're along for the ride because you think he will help you attain the relevance and power that your talent and personality cannot. Vance really exemplifies this kind of person. He's nothing but unadulterated ambition and he hitched his wagon to the person he thinks can take him to the summit, even though we all saw what Trump tried to pull on his last VP. He's a third husband who thinks that it'll be different this time because he's not like the others.

I'm honestly in awe of how effectively Trump has managed to convince a huge segment of society to overlook his rank incompetence and pitiful track record in both business and life. I'm still not sure whether his supporters honestly believe that he cares about them and will do things that benefit them or if they're just hateful little toads who are happy to see someone as degenerate as themselves in a position of power. I'm aware that his supporters aren't all trash, but they all definitely possess the spirit of someone who knows how much copper wire you need to trade for Sudafed.

Good grief. Your post is both tone deaf and clueless.

The millions of Americans who plan to vote for Trump know that we were far better off when Trump was in office.... economically, socially, and foreign-policy wise. And, there are many more who may have been on the fence, but have seem what a disaster Biden has been and know that should he win, the nation would have to deal with a Kamala presidency in short order. That is a bridge too far.

Anonymous wrote:https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4778323-trump-campaign-vice-presidential-debate/amp/


Hilarious. Vance won’t commit to debating Harris quite yet. He would destroy her in a debate as he can really talk and debate well. Harris is only ok.


But what is funny, and kinda true is that he is not sure she will even be the VP candidate in a few weeks!!! If they replace Biden with anyone else, then they may not keep Harris on the ticket. Also Harris may be elevated to the presidential nominee, so I see his point not committing until the nominations is resolved

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Do not teach your kids to stay in an abusive marriage. WTF. Teach them to get out and live a better life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump picked a great guy. Young, inspiring life story , not a neocon, in an interracial marriage, vet, dealt with addiction and abusive environment .

. He didn’t pick a tool like Haley or Little Marco. I’m glad he made a great VP choice that is anti WW3. Trump has my vote

Anti abortion, anti IVF, anti election integrity… who hurt him? Oh, his mommy. His mommy issues are the reason why he wants to control women.

He also wants to control the word women as belonging to women also. He’s mentioned the money spent in Ukraine should go as tax credits for working moms.

He understands poverty and struggle . Most moms in America are concerned about money not abortion

They will need the money but how will they work since he doesn’t support universal child care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Trump picked a great guy. Young, inspiring life story , not a neocon, in an interracial marriage, vet, dealt with addiction and abusive environment .

. He didn’t pick a tool like Haley or Little Marco. I’m glad he made a great VP choice that is anti WW3. Trump has my vote

Anti abortion, anti IVF, anti election integrity… who hurt him? Oh, his mommy. His mommy issues are the reason why he wants to control women.

He also wants to control the word women as belonging to women also. He’s mentioned the money spent in Ukraine should go as tax credits for working moms.

He understands poverty and struggle . Most moms in America are concerned about money not abortion