Anonymous wrote:Why 1.5 years? What’s so special or unique about this position that is so hard to fill
Maybe your standards are too high or maybe you are a biach.
Anonymous wrote:The new employee was in the job search for 1.5 years….
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So did you call her and tell her she can work remotely for as long as she needs and you will fly her up for team meetings every X weeks since is the person you need but family comes first?
We don’t do remote work
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She’s probably lying, but that’s ok. It’s life.
Why do you think that. She could be telling the truth? She did tell op beforehand what was going on.
I think she got a better offer, or maybe she realized OP has anger issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are you furious about? I doubt she took this decision lightly and it has absolutely NOTHING to do with you. Give the lady some grace.
I am furious because 1) I don’t believe she’s being honest 2) didn’t give a notice
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What type of specialty in HR? I agree with another poster that said that HR specialists are everywhere! From, recruiting, benefits, compensation, HRIS, etc. just do a quick search on LinkedIn. It should not take a year and a half to fill an HR specialist role for any of the HR disciplines unless there's something wrong with either the job description, or your company. I think you need to take a step back and reevaluate before you repost the job.
We’re in the architecture and engineering space. I needed someone who had that background and who specializes in recruiting. Then I had to find the right personality fit.
That is very specific. If it is that difficult to find a qualified candidate, your salary must be too low. So whoever's recruiting for the recruiter job is missing the boat.
That said, if it is such a difficult specialty, it might boo-hoo view to look at a lower level person to groom into the bigger role. You say that your company has great tenure. What about within your own discipline?
It’s not that hard to find recruiters in the AEC space. It’s probably hard when you have the work 100% onsite and for low pay though.
Agreed why does a recruiter have to be onsite?
Because OP is an insane control freak that would rather paralyze hiring for 1.5 years instead make a reasoned compromise.
It’s not me, it’s our company policy. There’s plenty of other companies that still work onsite.
Anonymous wrote:I would never move for an in-law with fronto-temporal dementia. But that's just me and my cold heart.
Carry on, OP. These things happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She is lying. I had a new hire do this to me.
Same scenario I calmed explained I went through this mom and you can order hospital bed and stuff from Medicaid ot Medicaid shop it to your house. Move the person your house. Insurance covers 20 hours a week for help and pay out of pocket rest.
It became apparent the parent was an excuse to quit.
Not everyone has a spare room in their house to move a parent and/or the ability to care for them all the other hours of the week beyond the 20 covered hours. You were so out of line to tell this employee how to manage their family’s health situation.
x1000000
You mean my divorced staff with a four bedroom house and no kids at home. She also had zero FMLA as new job and my job in person too. Her cobra was running low she jumped on my job to get on insurance then quit.
But my best staff member who wanted promotion she got started job hunting due to hiring her then also quit.
In end I hired better people. Not con artists.
In the end I found out person died and in her few weeks she pretended not dead. I caught her and claimed estate stuff. Luckily she quit.