Anonymous wrote:Early 50s is usually too young to retire with a pension plus health care.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:i would retire after the kids are through college. whatever your NW may be, I'd get them through that phase.
I don't understand this sentiment, nor do I understand the need to pay off mortgage before retirement. If you have a 529 for the kids plus $10M net worth (or even $5M), plus a pension, plus a government health care plan, how could you possibly be worried about not being able to pay for college or be able to pay your mortgage. You probably wouldn't even need to eat into any principle of your $10M to pay for those things.
I feel like people, especially in this area, are focused on amassing as much wealth as possible without thinking about what you will really need to have a comfortable and relaxing retirement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Do you have mortgage?
Do you have fully funded 529s?
OP here.
800k left on the mortgage, but I think I will be paying it down. Obviously, this does not affect NW.
Kids should have enough for instate (NW does not include their 529s)
None of this makes sense. Pay off your mortgage and save for college and grad school.
Anonymous wrote:We wouldn’t, at 50. I don’t trust our home values, which is a million of it or more—too many family members burned by RE crashes. They could expand a highway near us and we’d lose all that equity — even a school reasons could impact it. We have no pension and I’m not optimistic that SS will be there for us. I just feel like y 50 there are too many uncertainties — what if one of us gets cancer and we need to pay out of pocket for more aggressive treatment (happening to a friend). Why if one of the kids is struck with a chronic illness and can’t support themselves (happening to another friend). What if health insurance hosts increase more than anticipated (already happening and about to happen more due to all the regulation and litigation happening around prescription drug prices). The longer the timeline the wider the range of possible outcomes. And we are in fields where it would be hard to re enter once retired — if I were in a high demand field I would feel differently I think.
Anonymous wrote:No, not with kids that young as I believe it sets a bad example. I could have retired at 52 but I had two kids in HS and I had no desire to hand around the house or hang out with old people. So I worked until I was 60 and tripled my net worth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Can people just tell me how federal employees can amass 10mm by mid 50s??
Repeating the question: how can federal employees amass such brokerage accounts ? Did you all invest in crypto at the right time, or we’re living below means since age 20? Even two earners at the highest grade won’t get you there by mid 50s
Agree, no big woop, if OP is counting two accounts. On this board, I usually assume they are talking about combined accounts. $5m for 30 years is not much to brag about. It can be done without inheritance.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is PP who is retiring at 56 from federal government. My spouse and I both started our fed jobs straight out of college. We both invested the maximum in Thrift Savings Plan. We made full catch up contributions after turning 50. We both invested fully in the stock fund (C fund) and just let it ride. We never tried to time the market or play investment strategy games. Now at 56 and 55, we each have $2.5 million in each of our TSP accounts.
Oh I see - it’s a combined NW of 2 individuals. I’m at $2.8 NW at 46 as an individual. Somewhat concerned about “all stocks” investment
Your situation sounds reasonable and where you should be. But the OP seems to have $10mm so the numbers are just not adding up unless one of the spouses was much higher earner, or they invested in riskier assets or RE
Yes, makes a lot more sense and less impressive when you are counting two accounts lol. There is also quite a bit of luck involved if you were 100% C fund. And if you were able to start investing around the time Clinton was in office, you had the benefit of a great head start.
Anonymous wrote:This is a dumb question. If you can’t retire with that much money PLUS a pension (how much?) PLUS healthcare then no one can ever retire.