Anonymous wrote:If what you want is a university without all the holistic admissions nonsense to cover up admissions corruption, Hopkins is the place. Grades, Standardized tests, Teacher recommendations. Daddy does not need to set up an NGO.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:20% Native American doesn’t seem right.

I grew up in the midwest.

Many, many white people from that part of the country have native american ancestry in that part of the country. (For example, Oklahoma)

It's not. There were recent articles and studies done. Only 2% of the entire US population has Native American blood. When people like about race, it is most often Native American (like Elizabeth Warren). They also almost always say Cherokee---which is the least amount in the US.

So 20% in now way shape or form, NOT.

Anonymous wrote:My DD attends one of the University of California schools, and the enrollment at her particular university is 20 percent white. The plurality is Asian, followed by Hispanic.

Anonymous wrote:Forty percent of white kids were claiming URM status last year.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m confused! I thought race was no longer taken into consideration?

We will see by this years numbers at JHU if that’s true. There’s no way it can match past demographic breakouts if they are truly not considering race.

+100

If race is not a factor which Supreme Court ruled it cannot be. There is no way JHU can have whites at the sane percentage as blacks and Hispanics even higher.

Statistically that is impossible. Their admission stats should like wildly different for the next incoming class, if not they will be sued.

+1. Class of 2028 will be 90% Asian if they are actually following the law

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:20% Native American doesn’t seem right.

I grew up in the midwest.

Many, many white people from that part of the country have native american ancestry in that part of the country. (For example, Oklahoma)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:For the people in the back, not all Hispanic/Latino people have indigenous features. We come in many “shades”. Walking around campus and not seeing many “stereotypical” Latino students, does not mean there really aren’t a lot of them there.

But the only thing you share is a language.



Your family has benefited from colonization, slavery, feudal plantations, and a racist class system in your home country for however long they were there, be it 20 years or 400.

Why should you get priority admission over your landscaper from El Salvador's kids? They're indigenous to the Americas. Their family has suffered centuries of oppression and displacement--up to the present day.

You're not the same.

I'm all for overturning the simplistic definitions of race and culture we use, definitions that are gamed by the UMC just as everything else is. I would like to see emphasis be placed on first generation, and not on divisive arguments about race that create monolithic definitions based on skin tone that have no relation to history or heredity.

I agree with many of your points, yet still, as a Hispanic woman, less-indigenous looking and college educated, I have still been a victim of racism by white men and women. Men approached me assuming I was “easy”. My college roommate assumed I was “used to cleaning”.

My mother did not want to teach me Spanish, because she feared I would suffer the discrimination she did when she moved to this country.

People in the DMV might be less racist, but in other parts of the country, we are all known as lazy, beaner wetbacks!

Anonymous wrote:20% Native American doesn’t seem right.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A white “Pablo Garcia” looks just as Hispanic as an indigenous “Pablo Garcia” on a job application. Are all hiring managers free of biases? Have we moved on from that? Will people still discriminate against both Pablos? Will they think they are both lazy, criminals, rapists? Do many Hispanics feel they have to be 200% better than the rest to taken seriously? Do they have to always be aware of stereotypes, and do the complete opposite, just to feel accepted in certain circles? Were they placed in regular track k-12 classes, because it was assumed they couldn’t handle the work load of honors/AP classes?

All this still happens, but from the outside, it is hard to see. You know, how some white people say they haven’t noticed any racism.

Lazy criminals? That's not a stereotype I'm familiar with. I'ts the opposite, they are known as hard workers who have come here to do the hard back breaking work everyone else won't do.

Anonymous wrote:Not attending JHU because other kids got in, is not paying the price. UMC white kids will do just fine if the have enough of a work ethic. Parents connections, knowing how to navigate the system will help them succeed as well.

It should not be top 10 or bust.

Anonymous wrote:Class of 2028 will be 90% Asian if they are actually following the law

Anonymous wrote:A white “Pablo Garcia” looks just as Hispanic as an indigenous “Pablo Garcia” on a job application. Are all hiring managers free of biases? Have we moved on from that? Will people still discriminate against both Pablos? Will they think they are both lazy, criminals, rapists? Do many Hispanics feel they have to be 200% better than the rest to taken seriously? Do they have to always be aware of stereotypes, and do the complete opposite, just to feel accepted in certain circles? Were they placed in regular track k-12 classes, because it was assumed they couldn’t handle the work load of honors/AP classes?

All this still happens, but from the outside, it is hard to see. You know, how some white people say they haven’t noticed any racism.