Anonymous wrote:Would love to. But.... I think Joe will last.
So funny watching white guys lose their crap over the possibility of a black female as the president.

She's not black. She's brown (Indian).

Would love to. But.... I think Joe will last.
So funny watching white guys lose their crap over the possibility of a black female as the president.

Like anything else in politics, what is/was a worthy consideration to an extent (race/sex/inclusion) gets taken up as the issue of sole importance to many until we reach peak absurdity, and then we're on to the next thing.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is much more qualified than Trump or any other potential Republican nominee, who are all do-nothings and no-nothings.

Democrats have won 3 of the past 6 Presidential elections, the 3 in which the ticket included a Black Senator/former Senator and Joe Biden. Each time many White pundits were convinced that the Black Senator was unqualified and there is no way they could win, yet the ticket won due to higher turnout among young voters and minority voters.

You cannot be serious to compare Harris to Obama? She is an absolute moron. A true case of real life imitating art (see Veep for proof). I actually wonder if she has a substance abuse problem the way she rambles (see list of some of her greatest hits above). And yes, in this case considering Joe’s physical and mental condition, I would most definitely consider who the VP is.

Obama had done nothing as a Senator. He gave great speeches but that was the extent of his qualifications. Harris has better credentials than Obama had in 2008.

The above credential/resume obsession reminds me this is a DC board, even if everyone claims to be from ‘The Midwest’.

Obama had cred with many for opposing the Iraq War. Harris was almost purely a pretty face for idpol. And I’m pretty sure BHO had nothing as disturbing as Harris’s seemingly campaign-contribution driven failure to prosecute Steve Mnuchin!

Because Obama hadn’t had any executive authority before becoming President and it showed. He caved to interest groups and deferred to the Senate old guard. He may have opposed the Iraq war when he was an Illinois state senator, but as President he escalated the war in Afghanistan. He was not a progressive reformer except in his speeches.

Whereas Harris as AG for California, actually has executive experience.

Harris is terrible. Full stop.

You keep claiming this, but why? It is just your opinion. Others have a different opinion. She is a woman. A woman of color. She has more experience than Obama or Trump. Bush was a governor. Biden a senator and Vice President.

I mean, you may not agree with her policies (if you can even articulate any) but just saying "she is terrible" really doesn't move the ball on discourse.

DP. What, exactly, do the bolded have to do with anything? Who cares if she's a WOC? I'm a WOC. That doesn't mean I automatically vote for other WOC. I couldn't care less what a candidate's race or gender is. Why do you?

DP but it's really trendy to judge people according to race, gender, etc. For people who embrace this trend, no further analysis is warranted. Just, is this person the preferred race, sex, etc? Done. Honestly, I am sometimes jealous of these people. You don't have to read or think, just look at them and instantly categorize, with total confidence.

Kamala Harris 2028!

I’m also a WOC.

Kamala has set us back decades.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is much more qualified than Trump or any other potential Republican nominee, who are all do-nothings and no-nothings.

Democrats have won 3 of the past 6 Presidential elections, the 3 in which the ticket included a Black Senator/former Senator and Joe Biden. Each time many White pundits were convinced that the Black Senator was unqualified and there is no way they could win, yet the ticket won due to higher turnout among young voters and minority voters.

You cannot be serious to compare Harris to Obama? She is an absolute moron. A true case of real life imitating art (see Veep for proof). I actually wonder if she has a substance abuse problem the way she rambles (see list of some of her greatest hits above). And yes, in this case considering Joe’s physical and mental condition, I would most definitely consider who the VP is.

Obama had done nothing as a Senator. He gave great speeches but that was the extent of his qualifications. Harris has better credentials than Obama had in 2008.

The above credential/resume obsession reminds me this is a DC board, even if everyone claims to be from ‘The Midwest’.

Obama had cred with many for opposing the Iraq War. Harris was almost purely a pretty face for idpol. And I’m pretty sure BHO had nothing as disturbing as Harris’s seemingly campaign-contribution driven failure to prosecute Steve Mnuchin!

Because Obama hadn’t had any executive authority before becoming President and it showed. He caved to interest groups and deferred to the Senate old guard. He may have opposed the Iraq war when he was an Illinois state senator, but as President he escalated the war in Afghanistan. He was not a progressive reformer except in his speeches.

Whereas Harris as AG for California, actually has executive experience.

Harris is terrible. Full stop.

You keep claiming this, but why? It is just your opinion. Others have a different opinion. She is a woman. A woman of color. She has more experience than Obama or Trump. Bush was a governor. Biden a senator and Vice President.

I mean, you may not agree with her policies (if you can even articulate any) but just saying "she is terrible" really doesn't move the ball on discourse.

DP. What, exactly, do the bolded have to do with anything? Who cares if she's a WOC? I'm a WOC. That doesn't mean I automatically vote for other WOC. I couldn't care less what a candidate's race or gender is. Why do you?

What a gal.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/onpolitics/2019/01/27/willie-brown-kamala-harris-san-francisco-chronicle-letter/2695143002/

Although Brown supported Harris in her successful 2003 run for San Francisco district attorney, she tried to distance herself from him in that race, telling SF Weekly that Brown – whose career was dogged by corruption allegations – was an "albatross hanging around my neck."

"His career is over; I will be alive and kicking for the next 40 years. I do not owe him a thing," she told SF Weekly, vowing, "If there is corruption, it will be prosecuted."

Among the issues that followed Harris from her time with Brown was the allegation of cronyism in his appointment of her to two wel-paying posts.

Wasn’t she a side chick for Willie Brown the black former mayor of San Fran while his wife was sick? She slept her way to the top.

Bad character

Yes, at least she's not crazy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is much more qualified than Trump or any other potential Republican nominee, who are all do-nothings and no-nothings.

Democrats have won 3 of the past 6 Presidential elections, the 3 in which the ticket included a Black Senator/former Senator and Joe Biden. Each time many White pundits were convinced that the Black Senator was unqualified and there is no way they could win, yet the ticket won due to higher turnout among young voters and minority voters.

You cannot be serious to compare Harris to Obama? She is an absolute moron. A true case of real life imitating art (see Veep for proof). I actually wonder if she has a substance abuse problem the way she rambles (see list of some of her greatest hits above). And yes, in this case considering Joe’s physical and mental condition, I would most definitely consider who the VP is.

Obama had done nothing as a Senator. He gave great speeches but that was the extent of his qualifications. Harris has better credentials than Obama had in 2008.

The above credential/resume obsession reminds me this is a DC board, even if everyone claims to be from ‘The Midwest’.

Obama had cred with many for opposing the Iraq War. Harris was almost purely a pretty face for idpol. And I’m pretty sure BHO had nothing as disturbing as Harris’s seemingly campaign-contribution driven failure to prosecute Steve Mnuchin!

Because Obama hadn’t had any executive authority before becoming President and it showed. He caved to interest groups and deferred to the Senate old guard. He may have opposed the Iraq war when he was an Illinois state senator, but as President he escalated the war in Afghanistan. He was not a progressive reformer except in his speeches.

Whereas Harris as AG for California, actually has executive experience.

Harris is terrible. Full stop.

All she has to do is appoint a functional cabinet and country will run fine. President isn’t doing that much besides making sure that quality people are heading all the important departments. She is better than the guy selling bible for $60 bucks a piece. I say this as someone who doesn’t “like” Kamala Harris much.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is much more qualified than Trump or any other potential Republican nominee, who are all do-nothings and no-nothings.

Democrats have won 3 of the past 6 Presidential elections, the 3 in which the ticket included a Black Senator/former Senator and Joe Biden. Each time many White pundits were convinced that the Black Senator was unqualified and there is no way they could win, yet the ticket won due to higher turnout among young voters and minority voters.

You cannot be serious to compare Harris to Obama? She is an absolute moron. A true case of real life imitating art (see Veep for proof). I actually wonder if she has a substance abuse problem the way she rambles (see list of some of her greatest hits above). And yes, in this case considering Joe’s physical and mental condition, I would most definitely consider who the VP is.

Obama had done nothing as a Senator. He gave great speeches but that was the extent of his qualifications. Harris has better credentials than Obama had in 2008.

The above credential/resume obsession reminds me this is a DC board, even if everyone claims to be from ‘The Midwest’.

Obama had cred with many for opposing the Iraq War. Harris was almost purely a pretty face for idpol. And I’m pretty sure BHO had nothing as disturbing as Harris’s seemingly campaign-contribution driven failure to prosecute Steve Mnuchin!

Because Obama hadn’t had any executive authority before becoming President and it showed. He caved to interest groups and deferred to the Senate old guard. He may have opposed the Iraq war when he was an Illinois state senator, but as President he escalated the war in Afghanistan. He was not a progressive reformer except in his speeches.

Whereas Harris as AG for California, actually has executive experience.

Harris is terrible. Full stop.

You keep claiming this, but why? It is just your opinion. Others have a different opinion. She is a woman. A woman of color. She has more experience than Obama or Trump. Bush was a governor. Biden a senator and Vice President.

I mean, you may not agree with her policies (if you can even articulate any) but just saying "she is terrible" really doesn't move the ball on discourse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is much more qualified than Trump or any other potential Republican nominee, who are all do-nothings and no-nothings.

Democrats have won 3 of the past 6 Presidential elections, the 3 in which the ticket included a Black Senator/former Senator and Joe Biden. Each time many White pundits were convinced that the Black Senator was unqualified and there is no way they could win, yet the ticket won due to higher turnout among young voters and minority voters.

You cannot be serious to compare Harris to Obama? She is an absolute moron. A true case of real life imitating art (see Veep for proof). I actually wonder if she has a substance abuse problem the way she rambles (see list of some of her greatest hits above). And yes, in this case considering Joe’s physical and mental condition, I would most definitely consider who the VP is.

Obama had done nothing as a Senator. He gave great speeches but that was the extent of his qualifications. Harris has better credentials than Obama had in 2008.

The above credential/resume obsession reminds me this is a DC board, even if everyone claims to be from ‘The Midwest’.

Obama had cred with many for opposing the Iraq War. Harris was almost purely a pretty face for idpol. And I’m pretty sure BHO had nothing as disturbing as Harris’s seemingly campaign-contribution driven failure to prosecute Steve Mnuchin!

Because Obama hadn’t had any executive authority before becoming President and it showed. He caved to interest groups and deferred to the Senate old guard. He may have opposed the Iraq war when he was an Illinois state senator, but as President he escalated the war in Afghanistan. He was not a progressive reformer except in his speeches.

Whereas Harris as AG for California, actually has executive experience.

Harris is terrible. Full stop.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Harris is much more qualified than Trump or any other potential Republican nominee, who are all do-nothings and no-nothings.

Democrats have won 3 of the past 6 Presidential elections, the 3 in which the ticket included a Black Senator/former Senator and Joe Biden. Each time many White pundits were convinced that the Black Senator was unqualified and there is no way they could win, yet the ticket won due to higher turnout among young voters and minority voters.

You cannot be serious to compare Harris to Obama? She is an absolute moron. A true case of real life imitating art (see Veep for proof). I actually wonder if she has a substance abuse problem the way she rambles (see list of some of her greatest hits above). And yes, in this case considering Joe’s physical and mental condition, I would most definitely consider who the VP is.

Obama had done nothing as a Senator. He gave great speeches but that was the extent of his qualifications. Harris has better credentials than Obama had in 2008.

The above credential/resume obsession reminds me this is a DC board, even if everyone claims to be from ‘The Midwest’.

Obama had cred with many for opposing the Iraq War. Harris was almost purely a pretty face for idpol. And I’m pretty sure BHO had nothing as disturbing as Harris’s seemingly campaign-contribution driven failure to prosecute Steve Mnuchin!

Because Obama hadn’t had any executive authority before becoming President and it showed. He caved to interest groups and deferred to the Senate old guard. He may have opposed the Iraq war when he was an Illinois state senator, but as President he escalated the war in Afghanistan. He was not a progressive reformer except in his speeches.

Whereas Harris as AG for California, actually has executive experience.

Happily